ABCD
1
Talk page comments from Wikipedia. Part of the Study of Harassment and its Impact, and the WikiDetox Project.
2
timestamprevision_idtoxicityrevision_text
3
2017-09-04 00:43:24.000000 UTC
7988187820.9941493SHE WAS A FUCKING BADASS BITCH WHO CONFIDED THE FUCK IN ALEXANDERAND PEGGY
4
2017-09-04 16:27:43.000000 UTC
7989253660.99107105Fuc.k you Y'all need to die and burn in hell
5
2017-09-04 10:29:14.000000 UTC
7988814150.9892056Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck. 212.94.223.32 (talk)
6
2017-09-04 10:27:04.000000 UTC
7988811630.9892056Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck. 212.94.223.32 (talk)
7
2017-09-04 16:55:51.000000 UTC
7989290850.9871131NIGG* B*TCH
8
2017-09-04 01:46:19.000000 UTC
7988270780.98671687No, fuck you. 108.49.83.212 (talk)
9
2017-09-04 23:01:37.000000 UTC
7989787800.9863887Fuck all you ppl :D
10
2017-09-04 13:18:27.000000 UTC
7988999590.9758721Then fucking block me, you wiki-nazi. You are a hypocrite and a destabilizing force on Wikipedia.
11
2017-09-04 16:38:30.000000 UTC
7989268480.975632Fuc.k you Fuc.k you Fuc.k you you're a b:tchFuc.k you Fuc.k you Fuc.k you And a big Fuc.k you to
12
2017-09-04 21:16:32.000000 UTC
7989660580.9746447saale MC BC dog bitch
13
2017-09-04 16:24:41.000000 UTC
7989249460.97121316Fuc.k you Fuc.k you Fuc.k you you're a b:tchFuc.k you Fuc.k you
14
2017-09-04 13:17:29.000000 UTC
7988998720.95689076Diane: "Its a fucking talk page!!!"Wikipedia is not your blog either, yet you talk there. Grow up.
15
2017-09-04 01:09:19.000000 UTC
7988217840.95309645It is you who is a moron.
16
2017-09-04 12:42:52.000000 UTC
7988958900.9027101Useless idiot why are you removing links bastrd whya re you removing links bastrd. are you still playing vicvim card being holocaust or 9/11 survivor and fake news? dont take interest in India. Enough of British and Brahmins ruining it.
17
2017-09-04 14:24:23.000000 UTC
7989077760.9027101dick DickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDic
18
2017-09-04 14:22:50.000000 UTC
7989075710.9027101dick DickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDickDic
19
2017-09-04 13:23:14.000000 UTC
7989004990.8761376Twin Peaks PageIn the words of the infamous Diane:Drovethrughosts: "You can't talk in here."Diane: "Its a fucking talk page."Seriously, stop playing God, you devalue Wikipedia for all.:Talk pages are not for general discussion of the topic, please read . Use Reddit or something. Have a good day. Drovethrughosts (talk) Diane: "Its a fucking talk page!!!"Wikipedia is not your blog either, yet you talk there. Grow up.Why is it people like you always throw out the troll label when you disagree with someone, rather than having a constructive conversation? You are demoralizing and stigmatizing other wiki users with this poor behavior. This is why my ancestors left Europe, to escape people like you.
20
2017-09-04 14:43:20.000000 UTC
7989103040.8761376I Want A Assisted Suicide And When Punk Rock Is Sober To Get Resurrected, I Live In North Hollywood California, Call Me When Your Sober, As In Contact, You Heartless Bastards.
21
2017-09-04 13:19:05.000000 UTC
7989000320.8531023Twin Peaks PageIn the words of the infamous Diane:Drovethrughosts: "You can't talk in here."Diane: "Its a fucking talk page."Seriously, stop playing God, you devalue Wikipedia for all.:Talk pages are not for general discussion of the topic, please read . Use Reddit or something. Have a good day. Drovethrughosts (talk) Diane: "Its a fucking talk page!!!"Wikipedia is not your blog either, yet you talk there. Grow up.
22
2017-09-04 16:38:09.000000 UTC
7989268070.8521407I'm a pathetic loser with no life and no friends = I'm a pathetic loser with no life and no friends! =
23
2017-09-04 16:37:41.000000 UTC
7989267460.8521407I'm a pathetic loser with no life and no friends = I'm a pathetic loser with no life and no friends! =
24
2017-09-04 01:00:48.000000 UTC
7988207720.8490028WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, YOU VANDALIZED THE ARTICLE ON RICK SANCHEZ YOU JERK GloriousKim
25
2017-09-04 00:44:26.000000 UTC
7988189130.8490028WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, YOU VANDALIZED THE ARTICLE ON RICK SANCHEZ YOU JERK GloriousKim
26
2017-09-04 00:50:03.000000 UTC
7988195770.84789014WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, YOU VANDALIZED THE ARTICLE ON RICK SANCHEZ YOU JERK
27
2017-09-04 01:03:04.000000 UTC
7988210590.8321231Welcome! WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, YOU VANDALIZED THE ARTICLE ON RICK SANCHEZ YOU JERK GloriousKim
28
2017-09-04 08:19:22.000000 UTC
7988690180.82595015Hey idiot, the original BCHS was made by British men B4 about 85 years , and my school was made by American men from Boston , and if my school is not important and can't compete with UK or US school , how it produced an Iraqi Prime Minister, a Deputy Prime Minister, a Vice President, two dollar billionaires and a member of the British House of Lords, amongst many other notable alumni. And u didn't answer my question, R U she or he ?? Little KID !Note : Thanx 4 calling me Uncle, I'm not old enough to be uncle anyway , uncle is better than Little KID , isn't it ?
29
2017-09-04 15:21:38.000000 UTC
7989158850.82595015As soon as I said I wasn't going to respond, that was literally used against me, and the block was proposed. It's not just about calling someone a fuck off or fuckwit, but why we apparently have community consensus that don't seem to have import any more. And then this bizarre accusation of outing that someone was once sanctioned as a sock puppet. Nfitz (talk)
30
2017-09-04 13:14:09.000000 UTC
7988994820.82311994Twin Peaks PageIn the words of the infamous Diane:Drovethrughosts: "You can't talk in here."Diane: "Its a fucking talk page."Seriously, stop playing God, you devalue Wikipedia for all.
31
2017-09-04 20:17:13.000000 UTC
7989581170.8160599Sarkic Your link is pointless and out of date, and your own title for is clearly states he's gone on loan to Wigan ... My link was OFFICIAL ASTON VILLA so proved he was a keeper... But screw it, have it your way, I'll wait until something happens then get rid of all your rubbish
32
2017-09-04 22:20:32.000000 UTC
7989742100.79905546Putting a curse on WP is coals to Newcastle. Plenty cursed already. EEng
33
2017-09-04 15:19:17.000000 UTC
7989154730.78130203Nobody with half a brain would think this article is neutral. And just by uttering that it proves you as a traitor.
34
2017-09-04 14:42:37.000000 UTC
7989102160.779583Queer Ass Life I Want A Assisted Suicide And When Punk Rock Is Sober To Get Resurrected, I Live In North Hollywood California, Call Me When Your Sober.
35
2017-09-04 15:12:52.000000 UTC
7989144910.7764898Nah don't think so...unless you think we will be adding this about some stupid kids trying to scare players by saying some numbers like their hacking or something then no... XXDeathStarXx (talk)
36
2017-09-04 15:31:29.000000 UTC
7989175200.7753286Coco Coco is my doggy she go roof roof.
37
2017-09-04 08:55:59.000000 UTC
7988721060.76823187[User:Rentier|Rentier] you're just a fake and coward. now I will check all your editing. you do not know what to answer, do not go to the merit, you do not know how to bring evidence to your offices ... and like all crazy and incompetent nurses you only know how to report to others. Congratulations now everyone knows who you are and how you operate. wikipedia (and the web) would be a better place without "hoods" like you. Cavecanem101 (talk)
38
2017-09-04 14:23:52.000000 UTC
7989077100.76823187As soon as I said I wasn't going to respond, that was literally used against me, and the block was proposed. It's not just about calling someone a fuck off or fuckwit, but why we apparently have community consensus that don't seem to have import any more. And then this bizarre accusation of outing that someone was once sanctioned as a sock puppet which ... hang on, it just crossed my mind it must be in their block log ... yes, it's right there at the bottom, it clearly says abusing multiple accounts. Nfitz (talk)
39
2017-09-04 01:24:03.000000 UTC
7988239100.7354299Boy, I am sooooo dumb I put too many stuff things in
40
2017-09-04 03:48:59.000000 UTC
7988403250.7344514OWNership of Los Angeles bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics Hello,I am concerned that you are too invested into getting your way at that article, especially since you have a) move-warred against two different editors, and b) treated everybody who disagrees with you on the talk page as idiots. pbp
41
2017-09-04 13:28:01.000000 UTC
7989010010.7262867Hello, I'm Logosncompanies. It annoys everyone when people revert because of stupid sources, so please stop. Logosncompanies (talk)
42
2017-09-04 22:39:55.000000 UTC
7989762340.713877Bts vandalism Armys you better stop vandalizing everything gosh this is why everyone hates us I love BTS but i hate all of you Army44454 (talk)
43
2017-09-04 23:40:15.000000 UTC
7989828070.7045883You should stop doing that stupid edits. I mean why do we have redirects??? and stop doing that, cause one day i will just go and revert all your changes. Also Turkish Basketball Super League name is from 2016, so only from that year you should add that league name. Bozalegenda (talk)
44
2017-09-04 13:22:30.000000 UTC
7989004070.7009271This is ridiculous! Not common? Look at Greater Poland, Mazovia, Lesser Poland, and Kaszubia. Basically every part except Sielesia and East Pomorenia. E-960 (talk)
45
2017-09-04 08:33:05.000000 UTC
7988701570.7009271You telling me idiot, I'm not the one who doesn't know proper grammar and punctuation marks. You call me a little kid, heck even more younger kids than me know how to use punctuation marks. Your telling me that your school is made by an American guy from Boston? (Do you even know the founder's name?) Maybe he/she did a very good job 85 years ago, but maybe students like you, are making it a low-class school with your so called "grammar from other world", one more thing there is a very massive difference between past (85 years) and present day's education. If you can afford to go US or UK, go check their English. But be careful don't reply to them cuz then they will laugh at you, UNCLE! 😉 Pure conSouls (talk)
46
2017-09-04 09:41:53.000000 UTC
7988762360.7009271Sockpuppet This is sockpuppet Gabucho181. 212.94.223.32 (talk)
47
2017-09-04 18:52:43.000000 UTC
7989460390.6845967It must have been a heck of an imposter! Toddst1 (talk)
48
2017-09-04 14:01:53.000000 UTC
7989050670.6771105Disgusting how this user biruitorul is constantly deleting Hungarian language entries.
49
2017-09-04 14:27:30.000000 UTC
7989081640.6771105I've warned him. But that damned Google Books stymies me. Sitush, can you help? Even with your head woozy, I'm sure it's better than mine for this stuff. Bishonen talk .
50
2017-09-04 00:09:20.000000 UTC
7988150760.6771105Lack of ambiton I honestly don't see the problem with this. He played junior football when he could have easily played pro. And he is a hypocrite.Don't Էսպերանտո my user page Hi and j (talk)
51
2017-09-04 02:30:43.000000 UTC
7988319050.6771105still needs a cleanup...this article looks like it was written by a retard...which isn't surprising, considering only an MXC fan would care enough to barf up this amount of info about MXC onto a website.
52
2017-09-04 07:39:11.000000 UTC
7988645970.650503Go ahead and start it. What an ugly statue! Legacypac (talk)
53
2017-09-04 13:44:41.000000 UTC
7989029560.64452356That's just a pathetic conspiracy theory. Three words: Facundo Jones Huala. How does he fit in that scenario? Cambalachero (talk)
54
2017-09-04 04:27:06.000000 UTC
7988440220.64452356Jimmy Dore doesn't know what the hell he's talking about, he's a conspiracy theorist nutjob. Jaydogg1994 (talk)
55
2017-09-04 15:43:44.000000 UTC
7989193040.64452356The people who edited this wikipedia page should burn in hell. You describe him as penniless and bitter? Show me the "reliable source". Looks like you are editorializing. And also chemo kills people and there are millions of documented cases. Yet, I bet you can hardly cite more than a handful of alleged Rife deaths. The reality is, Rife cured not only cancer but 100s of diseases. There are videos of his labs and of pathogens being destroyed. The people who edited this page are traitors, enemies of truth, enemies of discovery and innovation, parties to an idiocracy. The deaths of millions is on the shoulders of each conspirator either those who are witting or unwitting. The "Cancer cure that worked" had 100s of sources, news articles and other things you can cite. Why didn't you cite those articles? Let me guess anyone who adds those will get reverted eventually by CIA, Vatican, AMA, or some useful idiot or doctor with their head up the governments ass and other places that are notorious for editing wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.156.246.158 (talk • contribs) Nobody with half a brain would think this article is neutral. And just by uttering that it proves you as a traitor.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.156.246.158 (talk • contribs)
56
2017-09-04 14:47:57.000000 UTC
7989109670.64452356SamHolt6 your life is here. Maybe cause you have not a real life.I'm not interest in this stupid discussion.At the end... the fact is... that you are not doing any valid edit... just comments, just tags.So... discuss on what with some like you?Thake your virtual word. Is that the only thing you have.the boomerangs were invented to hit the monkeys.you are not, you are just an "inseistive nick-fake virtual without a real life"comments on wikipedia the life of others because you do not fundamentally exist and you do not have one.peace & love ... and goodbyeCavecanem101 (talk)
57
2017-09-04 15:18:50.000000 UTC
7989154110.64452356The people who edited this wikipedia page should burn in hell. You describe him as penniless and bitter? Show me the "reliable source". Looks like you are editorializing. And also chemo kills people and there are millions of documented cases. Yet, I bet you can hardly cite more than a handful of alleged Rife deaths. The reality is, Rife cured not only cancer but 100s of diseases. There are videos of his labs and of pathogens being destroyed. The people who edited this page are traitors, enemies of truth, enemies of discovery and innovation, parties to an idiocracy. The deaths of millions is on the shoulders of each conspirator either those who are witting or unwitting. The "Cancer cure that worked" had 100s of sources, news articles and other things you can cite. Why didn't you cite those articles? Let me guess anyone who adds those will get reverted eventually by CIA, Vatican, AMA, or some useful idiot or doctor with their head up the governments ass and other places that are notorious for editing wikipedia.
58
2017-09-04 03:29:05.000000 UTC
7988380380.64452356What? Not at all, you're insane or lying. 70.80.167.254 (talk)
59
2017-09-04 21:37:34.000000 UTC
7989688950.62921435Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Poorly references sports biographies Okay, I've had some time to think about this mess now and have done quite a lot of work trying to clean it up. Frankly, the whole thing is an absolute shambles and it should never have happened. What you should have done, if you are so concerned about the quality of those articles, was place tags on them to request improvement (e.g., Template:Refimprove).May I ask by what "right" you have perpetrated your "draftification" (what a stupid word) upon ? I understand the size of the WP community runs into the millions so I would expect a consensus ruling that directly impacts one project (and thus, by implication, all of them) to be based on a substantial consensus. Instead, I find that the great discussion at ANI involved a mere THIRTEEN editors of whom only SIX supported the motion to "draftify" those articles. Six. Of those six, two can rightly be described as inexperienced and, therefore, unqualified. So, four experienced editors are, by virtue of mass disinterest in ANI, effectively dictating to a project what they shall and shall not do. That is absolutely appalling. Are you a Tory, by any chance?Then, when you came to do your "draftification", you made a complete and utter balls of it, as User:Dweller and others have already pointed out to you. Your initial argument was, in effect, to accuse User:02blythed of . Of course, it will not occur to you that you are guilty, and even more so, of the same charge. I don't suppose you feel inclined to help us clean up the fine mess you have created? No, I didn't think so. Jack talk page
60
2017-09-04 21:21:27.000000 UTC
7989667010.6218807Heated Petanque ball explodes, killing firefighter Heated Petanque ball explodes, killing firefighter. September 3, 2017. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30325633 223.24.101.237 (talk)
61
2017-09-04 04:26:49.000000 UTC
7988439890.6117018Jimmy Dore doesn't know what the hell he's talking about, he's a conspiracy theorist nutjobJaydogg1994 (talk)
62
2017-09-04 23:10:12.000000 UTC
7989796480.60783094erb= Mesozoi
63
2017-09-04 02:00:44.000000 UTC
7988285080.60783094Of potential interest... Random Nerds. Nikkimaria (talk)
64
2017-09-04 14:06:04.000000 UTC
7989055640.60680336Nfitz, I haven't read too much into the extended conversations, but if it's (merely) about why editors can get away with "fuck off", my opinion is that it highly depends on the context. I have some thoughts about this too, and if you'd like I can explain my understanding of the rationale. In the meanwhile, may I request that if possible, to not comment in that thread anymore even if you are being pinged? Please. Alex ShihTalk
65
2017-09-04 15:14:42.000000 UTC
7989147940.5997845The Statement I hope this is still "in process". I'm reminded of Abe Lincoln who, after he was shot and killed (much like some RfAs go – full of criminal INjustice), letters to various people were found in his desk, unsent. Many, for example, were to General Grant, chastising him for this and that in manners that might chill one's spine. But as I said, they were all unsent. This was evidently Abe's way of getting shit off his chest. Then he could write a much more effective letter to Grant. So write your statement, and make it as powerful and nasty as you can. Then put it in a drawer, take some long, deep breaths, and write the "real letter to Grant". Everytime we have a chance to do this, it is a chance to make the system better and more effective. Always remember that just like Wikipedia, you rock! Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  
66
2017-09-04 14:51:10.000000 UTC
7989113660.5989618You have zero academic sources, if you have them then list them. Otherwise it is nothing more than bigoted nationalism.StampyElephant (talk)
67
2017-09-04 15:06:53.000000 UTC
7989135440.5977265You have zero academic sources, if you have them then list them, otherwise it is nothing more than bigoted nationalism.StampyElephant (talk)
68
2017-09-04 09:17:45.000000 UTC
7988738990.580685nihlus kryikIt is not true.If you see the story of the interventions on this page I have nothing to do with it.I just opened a question with a user on this tag. What you have restored.There is no evidence in this regard.And I've also added a real editing to eliminate problems.But besides putting tags it was not able to do high.I'm not lying with anyone.In fact, do you know that there is?I'm afraid, you fucking want to.Use wikipedia as your personal niche to be paid for what you do.Anyway ... your names will end up in some online article as examples of what this platform is doing ... so much ... are you just anonymous? ;-)What a beautiful thing is becoming the "free net".A place where anonymous can write rumble without evidence.Cavecanem101 (talk)
69
2017-09-04 13:26:55.000000 UTC
7989008750.57823396Twin Peaks Talk PageWhy is it people like you always throw out the troll label when you disagree with someone, rather than having a constructive conversation? You are demoralizing and stigmatizing other wiki users with this poor behavior. This is why my ancestors left Europe, to escape people like you.Dealing with you and your cohort is like being Rodney King on the ground dealing with LA Cops.
70
2017-09-04 11:24:55.000000 UTC
7988877870.57823396Block I'm really tired of all this. There's nothing left to debate. Everything I said to Bish was wholly civil, reasonable, and pleasant. I simply don't understand how you can call someone a fuckwit, with no provocation, and not violate . I simply asked a couple of question, didn't get much of a response, and apologized when they said it they didn't want to answer. And then the peanut gallery comes after me? And how is extremely subtly referring to someone's sock puppet history that they mention themselves, on their own user page, outing someone? And even if they didn't mention it, since when was past sock puppetting a secret? Nfitz (talk)
71
2017-09-04 18:15:12.000000 UTC
7989406400.5781505Hitler did nothing wrong
72
2017-09-04 17:17:29.000000 UTC
7989321440.5658495Edit summaries You may want to be careful. Your use of all capital letters and the word "fucking" in edit summaries such as this and this are and can become a blockable offense if they continue to pile up. Please remember to remain calm when editing. Thank you. DarkKnight2149
73
2017-09-04 07:45:22.000000 UTC
7988651730.562779ACDC was a bad band hee hee.
74
2017-09-04 22:41:17.000000 UTC
7989763800.562779Thank you for your encouragement, but you see now how correct I was above. My changes of recent weeks were *both* discussed at this page (in this thread and the following one), and then some fool comes along and reverts them and says "please discuss at talk before making changes". God, Wikipedia could have been great, but not enough people in the world give enough of a shit to make it so; just a few clowns like the reverter just mentioned. Karmanatory (talk)
75
2017-09-04 19:45:45.000000 UTC
7989536770.562779Illogic is a poor argument. It remains a puffed-up dictionary entry, and any who'd claim it has potential utility are unable to turn it into something encyclopedic. I am not here to salvage all the abandoned ugly puppies littering Wikipedia. Weeb Dingle (talk)
76
2017-09-04 12:55:42.000000 UTC
7988973700.5625387On it. Christ, these people are persistently annoying. C-GAUN (talk)
77
2017-09-04 08:47:32.000000 UTC
7988713800.55579096The only people who helped Yarri when he was old and very unwell, was my dad's first cousin's, (no times removed), family, the Deightons of the Royal Oak Hotel at South Gundagai which hotel was near Yarri's camp. That record is in the old Gundagai newspapers of the time, on 'Trove'. The Deightons took Yarri food and shelter after he had crawled back to his South of the Murrumbidgee River country, after leaving Gundagai hospital and crawling 'home' to die. The Deightons cared for that very unwell Aboriginal human being as he was so unwell and no one else Aboriginal or non Aboriginal in the area would assist him out of any sense of humanity. Today I am again being stalked by someone who seems to have some issue about me not being a fan of the paedophile and murderer, Yarri. I am never a fan of anyone who kills and abuses Aboriginal and non Aboriginal females or European explorers given the bounty that European exploration has delivered to Australia's Aboriginal people while at the same time acknowledging that Australia's Aboriginal people also had some very negative impacts from European invasion of Australia, and I'd wonder what the ethics of this ridiculous Gundagai stalker stalker are???? Johneen Treanor Jones - Gundagai
78
2017-09-04 13:23:47.000000 UTC
7989005610.55546755not greater Poland. Secondly do not revive information which has been there for ages. You are obviously vindictive. Oliszydlowski
79
2017-09-04 01:06:32.000000 UTC
7988214470.55482024The correct abbreviation for "versus" in legal cases is 'v.' A relatively new user has repeatedly changed the correct "v." abbreviation in this article to "vs.". (I'll give the new user the benefit of the doubt despite the fact that, other than this edit war, his or her sole contributions to Wikipedia is to label Southern German Austrians as "Australian dick fuckers" and then self-reverting. I'll charitably assume that that ill-advised start was just a foolish prank and the self-revert represented repentance.)In U.S. case law, the correct abbreviation for "versus" is "v.", not "vs."; see The Bluebook: a Uniform System of Citation, Rule 10: ("v." for "versus). has been fighting the good fight and correcting Rcoffelt's error with appropriate edit summaries, but Rcoffelt seems to elude the clue, so I'm making it explicit here. TJRC (talk)
80
2017-09-04 02:55:37.000000 UTC
7988348150.5481133ANTHRAX EDIT I do not know who the heck you are but you removed my edit and told me to repost with the citation. I did and then you send me another message and threaten me with getting me banned? I posted the link that showed the years that the band got the Grammy Nominations what more could you need?KJH
81
2017-09-04 01:14:22.000000 UTC
7988225590.53844637Attempt to engage in dialogue with neutral admin Attempt to engage in dialogue with neutral admin In an attempt to understand the issue better, and understand how I was failing to comprehend how it was okay to swear at users all over the place, I attempted to engage an admin who was aware of the debate, but who wasn't involved and had previously invited me to discuss on their talk page, and who I respected what I perceived to be their willingness to be a straight-shooter. Sadly the attempt was very distracted by unwanted thread-jackers who only served to obfuscate and divert the discussion. The complete unwillingness of anyone to actually discuss the issue, only leaves me with feeling, that my interpretation of isn't far off, and while an occasional insult or single episode of verbal abuse or profanity might be okay, especially if one feels wronged. (although I not really sure why people just can't be grown ups, and use AGF to realize they haven't been slighted, but have simply misinterpreted (or often chosen to misinterpret in the United State's bizarre culture wars) - sometimes it feels too many around here are under 30.)Once I remove the unnecessary comments to/from the peanut gallery, the exchange was:Thanks for your comments about my lack of proof reading. As producing long well-edited written reports is much of my livelihood, I'm mortified to see how poor a couple of those comments are, and I'll work hard to avoid such unclear communication! I remain perplexed though, why telling someone to "fuck off" in a heated edit during an AFD discussion is not an insult. I've read several times during this discussion. NPA says "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done". And this isn't some sly, intelligent, subtle insult - it's an offensive insult. Obviously I'm completely misinterpreting somehow, given the clear consensus; but I don't see where. I suppose I should just accept it, and enjoy the freedom to use the phrase itself.BTW, speaking of insults, was the word "idiotically" necessary, given I wasn't keeping insisting on sanctions? I kept insisting that "FO" was a personal attack - and perhaps that does make me an idiot - but I don't see how "idiotically" helps. (though perhaps once I figure out why "fuck off" is not an insult - it will make more sense to me. Nfitz (talk) And for that that simple and as far as I can see, very civil and polite exchange, I don't think the apology was accepted, is it was blanked an hour later with an edit comment '''No, really, I've had it. Nfitz, don't post in a thread that (purely because of you) has been *closed*. Go away and don't come back. Don't apologize again. Don't post on my page again. Take a powder.''' Note, that the thread wasn't *closed* by the us
82
2017-09-04 12:57:20.000000 UTC
7988975510.5332645Your behaviors raises some questions, as to why such a strong reaction to this type of content? This is a legitimate item related to Poland, you can't just block that entry. It is legitimate… sorry. If you have a problem I'll request a RfC. This is ridiculous! E-960 (talk)
83
2017-09-04 08:45:51.000000 UTC
7988712420.52215654The only people who helped Yarri when he was old and very unwell, was my dad's first cousin's family, the Deightons of the Royal Oak Hotel at South Gundagai which hotel was near Yarri's camp. That record is in th eold Gundagai newspapers of the time, on TRove.The Deightons took Yarri food and shelter after he had crawled back to his South of the Murrumbidgee River country, after leaving Gundagai hospital and crawling 'home' to die. The Deightons cared for that very unwell Aboriginal human being as he was so unwell and no one else Aboriginal or non Aboriginal in the area would assist him out of any sense of humanity. Today I am again being stalked by someone who seems to have some issue about me not being a fan of the paedophile and murderer, Yarri. I am never a fan of anyone who kills and abuses Aboriginal and non Aboriginal females or European explorers given the bounty that European exploration has delivered to Australia's Aboriginal people while at the same time acknowledging that Australia's Aboriginal people also had some very negative impacts from European invasion of Australia, and I'd wonder what the ethics of this ridiculous Gundagai stalker stalker are???? Johneen Treanor Jones - Gundagai
84
2017-09-04 21:31:44.000000 UTC
7989680820.51986474Heated Petanque ball explodes, killing firefighter. September 3, 2017.English http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30325633Thai* https://www.khaosod.co.th/breaking-news/news_495506*https://www.thairath.co.th/content/1058190*http://www.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/771236*https://mgronline.com/local/detail/9600000090185* http://www.banmuang.co.th/news/crime/89726*https://m.posttoday.com/social/hot/512688 223.24.101.237 (talk)
85
2017-09-04 22:58:09.000000 UTC
7989783600.51827955LOL, that's what I thought too - and it was somewhere between an op-ed piece and a poison-pen diatribe! MelanieN (talk)
86
2017-09-04 09:54:59.000000 UTC
7988777220.51789004And..? This talk of you guys is from Oct 2015. When will this ugly article name be gone, please? It is almost Oct 2017 now. Agreed this current name is not really good, it is in fact awful.Naki (talk)
87
2017-09-04 15:32:35.000000 UTC
7989176660.516776Hah,and im confused bout you and why u hyjack???? XXDeathStarXx (talk)
88
2017-09-04 16:55:56.000000 UTC
7989290960.51080155apology dear crystallizedcarbon i am sincerley sorry about that i was at a stag party with my drunk friends again sorry
89
2017-09-04 17:21:46.000000 UTC
7989327410.50855803Masar
90
2017-09-04 16:58:30.000000 UTC
7989294210.5085229Name of the hacker is Nicoloi Ondrejko
91
2017-09-04 22:22:15.000000 UTC
7989744170.50792813September 2017 Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shit, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
92
2017-09-04 09:06:08.000000 UTC
7988729210.5073519Please talk to me before going to ANI If you didn't like the way I edited that, without a link, please just contact me. I've never shown any antipathy at you, and as I've pointed out, you are quite welcome at my talk page. Simply because we disagree about things such as whether or not you can call people fuckwits without violating (uh, I'm from the UK, and certainly fuckwit isn't a particularly common form of friendly address that I've seen ... but I've never had the misfortune of having to slow down on the M6 in any part of Lancashire - do you with AGF think it's comparable to bro?), doesn't mean that I have any hostility. Nfitz (talk)
93
2017-09-04 08:11:23.000000 UTC
7988682980.5068122Heah, Ferret and Sergecross73 do deserve respect, so why this didn't came in your made before using aggressive language with them as well? And what a joke, you put [space] before comma to make lines tidy! 😆 maybe you should make a more valid excuse for that. 😂 Pure conSouls (talk)
94
2017-09-04 05:01:06.000000 UTC
7988475670.5065705Sockpuppet investigation jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk)
95
2017-09-04 05:01:07.000000 UTC
7988475680.5065705Sockpuppet investigation jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk)
96
2017-09-04 19:18:14.000000 UTC
7989495620.5061963Terry Gross*http://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/2000/09/21/12997641/*http://www.npr.org/2013/04/29/179014321/marc-maron-a-life-fueled-by-panic-and-dread*http://www.npr.org/2015/05/20/407981536/terry-gross-to-marc-maron-life-is-harder-than-radio*http://www.npr.org/2016/05/24/479312227/marc-maron-on-sobriety-and-managing-his-uncomfortable-comfort-zoneXb2u7Zjzc32 (talk)
97
2017-09-04 03:20:38.000000 UTC
7988372100.5051325They have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you Schumer of New York told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that President Trump was “being really dumb” to take on the intelligence community, since “They have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.” 87.156.224.140 (talk)
98
2017-09-04 10:39:38.000000 UTC
7988825890.504814Also seeing you give a Barnstar to E.M. Gregory is nauseating. It's a reward for bad behaviour. Sport and politics (talk)
99
2017-09-04 19:29:07.000000 UTC
7989511800.50479454= Unwatching this page =I am not going to continue arguing with editors who I believe are violating NPOV, so I am unwatching this page. If anyone is ever able to name the restaurant, name a single person who attended or witnessed the alleged meeting, or say exactly when it supposedly happened, drop me a line on my talk page. Likewise, if anyone ever comes up with any shred of actual evidence that any such group as the "First Iowa Stormer Bookclub" existed in 2016 (the SPLC still says that it exists and that it is "statewide"), drop me a line. No, some idiot neo-nazi forming a new group with that name after this became national news does not count. I stand by my assertion that NPOV is being violated here, but I am withdrawing from attempting to address the problem because doing so is clearly a lost cause. Anyone is free to respond to this, but I won't see the responses. I suggest dropping the stick and quietly accepting your "victory" without gloating. Again, drop me a line on my talk page if anyone comes up with any actual evidence. Guy Macon (talk)
100
2017-09-04 20:31:59.000000 UTC
7989601030.50404537Neo-Nazis hate disabled people. This is according to many reliable sources. Your opinion that they don't is . Your experience listening to some songs doesn't accurately represent larger larger movement. We need . If you know of a reliable source which says neo-Nazi punks rarely sing about disabled people or Romani, let's see it. Sampling this music isn't good enough.:Neo-Nazis are, for the most part, angry and irrational. This includes neo-Nazi punks. If you're looking for ideological consistency from a small, non-random sample of neo-Nazi punks, you're going to be disappointed. They target whoever is convenient at the time, which includes Romani and disabled people. Anti-Romani sentiment and violence are still a very big deal among some neo-Nazi groups, such as in the Czech Republic. Just because you are not personally familiar with this, doesn't make it irrelevant. Isn't the point of Wikipedia to learn about things you are not personally familiar with?:The place to discuss this further is '''the article's talk page'''. Not here. Thanks. Grayfell (talk)
101
2017-09-04 16:34:05.000000 UTC
7989262520.50401306On the other hand,, I got blocked for infinite (both original and this account), and have created this next account to say thank you for defending me on a block. Fuc.k for treating you like trash. I'm so sorry he is so fuc.king mean to you, and hearing that you have had many issues, I wish you the best of luck.-The next A Great Catholic Person
102
2017-09-04 05:08:51.000000 UTC
7988483790.50387704Done. RivertorchFIREWATER
103
2017-09-04 02:32:45.000000 UTC
7988321380.503658Sockpuppet investigation — nihlus kryik  (talk)
104
2017-09-04 02:32:45.000000 UTC
7988321410.503658Sockpuppet investigation — nihlus kryik  (talk)
105
2017-09-04 18:16:31.000000 UTC
7989408490.5035211But Hitler absolutely nothing wrong
106
2017-09-04 21:48:34.000000 UTC
7989703130.49442038It sounds like you disagree with the subject of the bio's religious views. There are many religions that are critical of gay people, most notably fundamental Christianity. There are also religions which are critical of people of African ancestry (mormons claim in the Book of Abraham that black people were cursed by god for joining Satan's rebellion in the pre-existence and were denied the priesthood until 1978). Some religions, like Islam, claim that all non-believers deserve to be killed ("all infidels must die" is written in the Koran). I don't find the tone all that promotional, and you have not even attempted to edit the article and address those areas. Please do so and help point out these areas. You cannot just sit and bad mouth the article without helping to correct its tone. Octoberwoodland (talk)
107
2017-09-04 19:42:51.000000 UTC
7989533110.49236718Which Holocaust Why is this article about the killing of Jews in Ukraine. What about the Holocaust of Ukrainians caused by the USSR?203.80.61.102 (talk)
108
2017-09-04 23:44:43.000000 UTC
7989832780.48553255Harry Do you think you would make a page for Harry now he has been revealed as Amy's killer?
109
2017-09-04 04:57:10.000000 UTC
7988471990.47960493Shilow? Oy vey, goyim, don't ye mean shoah? Gotta recognize the holohoax- oops, the holocaust, and the six gorillion! 2604:2000:814B:B300:7403:898A:5AD:A981 (talk)
110
2017-09-04 12:45:02.000000 UTC
7988961430.46807653The blurb is garbage as usual. I've added an annotation to the image (visible in Commons) to highlight the Pistol Star. It might be useful to add more - even the original five Quintuplet stars are not obvious. Lithopsian (talk)
111
2017-09-04 20:45:36.000000 UTC
7989619550.4620808Guignol
112
2017-09-04 07:35:10.000000 UTC
7988642590.46144518Do you have any source for your grades. You can be a liar. If I suppose that your very good in English, so why you added [Space] before comma in your edit summary, UNCLE. Maybe you should concentrate more on your grammar or go to an elite school if they let you in. 😆I also know about your so called "politeness" with other wikipedia users, such as Ferret and Sergecross73. That type of conversation is acceptable for you? Pure conSouls (talk)
113
2017-09-04 08:18:38.000000 UTC
7988689530.46095464Yeah, Ferret and Sergecross73 do deserve respect, so why this didn't came in your mind before using aggressive language with them as well? And what a joke, you put [space] before comma and even full stops to make lines tidy! 😆 maybe you should make a more valid excuse for that. 😂 Pure conSouls (talk)
114
2017-09-04 04:39:56.000000 UTC
7988455670.46095464Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) poop is yummy in my tummy. eat poop its good for you AND for the economy
115
2017-09-04 20:32:56.000000 UTC
7989602280.46095464= and considering treating white nationalist and neo- spi violence as terrorist acts =You missed "later that day, legislators in Sacramento advanced resolutions that would treat violent acts committed by antifa movement’s enemies — white nationalists and neo-Nazis — as terrorist acts under state law." Doug Weller talk
116
2017-09-04 20:55:46.000000 UTC
7989632220.46095464Oh Give me a break... you manufactured the drama on that page Guy, it's pretty ridiculous to turn around as and act like the victim (or like you're somehow above it all). And I'm sorry, but if you're not willing to actually suggest edits then you've got nothing to complain about. It's not our job to rewrite the page for you to better suit your point of view. Fyddlestix (talk)
117
2017-09-04 07:01:53.000000 UTC
7988614550.46095464Scratch that, you clearly don't, so let me explain this as clearly as I possibly can. Every single person has told you you are wrong. Every single person. It doesn't matter if you think you are right. It doesn't matter if you think you have a proper citation. If EVERYONE ELSE tells you that you are WRONG, on wikipedia, that means you are WRONG. Every place you have gone to has told you the same thing. You've even been blocked for it. But no, you continue to shout like an insane person saying "Everyone else is wrong, I am right!" Consensus is something YOU have to build. You don't automatically get to include something if you disagree with the arguments presented. No, the onus is in YOU. If YOU can't convince ANYONE ELSE that it should be included, then it SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED. And yes, if you continue to push this, if you post one more time arguing that it should be included, I will do EVERYTHING in my power to get you removed from Wikipedia. Is that a threat? On my talk page, you sure as hell bet it is. Drop it. Now. Tarage (talk)
118
2017-09-04 15:38:22.000000 UTC
7989185060.46095464More squalid Wehrmacht WorshippingI deleted the statement that Guderian disliked the Nazis and, lo and behold, considered resigning over their treatment of the jews. Unless some source may be found for these claims. They must never reappear. Guderian's Nazi enthusiasm and antisemitism are well established. this Wehrmachtophiliac myth-making must end.: Would you care to give a source to your claim: "Guderian's Nazi enthusiasm and antisemitism are well established"? Sensemaker
119
2017-09-04 15:42:43.000000 UTC
7989191430.46095464Blocked Justin. Is there any reason to believe Electric Playground is an actual thing, or is it a complete hoax? Sergecross73 msg me
120
2017-09-04 15:20:42.000000 UTC
7989157120.46095464More squalid Wehrmacht worshippingI deleted the statement that Guderian disliked the Nazis and, lo and behold, considered resigning over their treatment of the Jews. Unless some source may be found for these claims. They must never reappear. Guderian's Nazi enthusiasm and antisemitism are well established. This Wehrmachtophiliac myth-making must end.Would you care to give a source to your claim: "Guderian's Nazi enthusiasm and antisemitism are well established"? Sensemaker
121
2017-09-04 11:01:43.000000 UTC
7988851320.46095464Overtly antisemitic edits like this one make it very difficult to presume that CompactSpacez is acting in good faith, rather than simply trolling this talk page by posing as an offended gay Romani. As such, I have restored the hat. TheWhangdepootenawah (talk)
122
2017-09-04 17:31:26.000000 UTC
7989339900.46095464RealtraPat Shanahan
123
2017-09-04 17:06:36.000000 UTC
7989305510.46095464Universal's House of Horrors ...first pass done
124
2017-09-04 03:36:30.000000 UTC
7988388940.46095464This article is a complete joke and provides no historical insight, just politically driven Assyrian ideology.
125
2017-09-04 19:54:59.000000 UTC
7989548630.46095464Amandajm: "It is beyond doubt that Michelangelo was actively homosexual" is hilariously false. There is no evidence whatsoever that Michelangelo was sexually active. Schlier22 (talk)
126
2017-09-04 19:54:08.000000 UTC
7989547570.46095464dear crystallizedcarbon i am sincerley sorry about that i was at a stag party with my drunk friends again sorry
127
2017-09-04 19:20:51.000000 UTC
7989499520.46095464So because one user supports the broader antifascist movement, everyone who edits the article is a card-carrying member of Antifa? Do you not see the hypocrisy here?:::::::And as someone who studied and worked in education, no this is not why teachers don't let students use Wikipedia and that is a useless red herring that only gets thrown out when one can't make a valid point. Ian.thomson (talk)
128
2017-09-04 19:13:11.000000 UTC
7989487730.46009248yuiasd
129
2017-09-04 20:56:18.000000 UTC
7989632790.45994532Oh Give me a break... you manufactured the drama on that page Guy, it's pretty ridiculous to turn around and act like the victim (or like you're somehow above it all). And I'm sorry, but if you're not willing to actually suggest edits then you've got nothing to complain about. It's not our job to rewrite the page for you to better suit your point of view. Fyddlestix (talk)
130
2017-09-04 07:04:21.000000 UTC
7988616520.45962961) The sections you're complaining about are sourced to: Reuters, BBC News, Time Magazine and NPR. To all but the most fringe elements, those are reliable sources. 2) Per, those videos are highly problematic and generally not used, for many reasons - not the least of which, is copyright. 3) You are still incapable of mustering a defense for why your comments were little more than violations. 4) But the fact that you would have the temerity to whine about "democrats" just reveals once more that your only real agenda here is as a POV pusher. Your supposed protestations about "neutrality" are a transparent fraud. The evidence proves your only interest is to use this platform to advance your own political views and to insert them where you can in articles throughout this project. Witness this screed, this comment and so many more. But this one says it all. You're nothing but an unapologetic pov warrior and, in my view, you exemplify everything that's wrong with this project. But the fact that you would base your original criticism on the "unbiasedness of Wikipedia," for me, makes you something far worse than a pov pusher. More depressing, it exposes your incredibly cynical and astoundingly hypocritical behavior. It also begs the legitimate question of whether your contributions to this project are, or ever could be, constructive. X4n6 (talk)
131
2017-09-04 09:06:14.000000 UTC
7988729300.45939565Everyone who comments against you aren't friends. Normally, where there is smoke, there is fire. And you are the fire. Stop blaming everyone else for getting caught up. Stop making personal attacks against other users. Keeping it up will only get you blocked. — nihlus kryik  (talk)
132
2017-09-04 18:57:09.000000 UTC
7989466490.45934498I have found your twitter page, in which you describe me/my edits as alt-right. Thank you for the insult over the internet. I'm not even white, but ok. I am totally an alt-right neo-nazi bigot kkk klansman fascist mcnazifashy whatever you say I am. I just wanted to get equal coverage of both sides on the whole antifa debacle, and you are strawmanning. I would like a deletion of said slander. I recognize you have biases, and I have mine (I am actually a classical liberal vehmently opposed to any sort of racial or ethnic collectivism).:: Said user has already posted their full name in their User: page. I will just say your twitter page.
133
2017-09-04 00:04:27.000000 UTC
7988144230.459044can someone please acnoladge the fact that john was A rainbow cinnamon bun face who killed people with a knife in war?
134
2017-09-04 18:38:05.000000 UTC
7989440480.4587469Your lack of command of basic sentence structure, leaves even me, confused as to what you are trying to say...and that's saying something!With respect to your obsession with the technical phrase station blackout and how that is re-directing to the article "power failure", and from there, you inferring some vast conspiracy that this is blaming the power grid...can you perhaps take a second away from smoking reefer and perhaps look at the jumps of sheer conspiratorial fervor you are doing to arrive at this notion?Thanks. As the station lost power, it had a power failure end of story. Nothing to do with the power grid. Agreed?:I am reverting your edit again as the sentence you are attempting to inject, is well, total garble-ation.:Boundarylayer (talk)
135
2017-09-04 10:57:55.000000 UTC
7988846450.45826945Also seeing you give a Barnstar to E.M. Gregory is nauseating. It's a reward for bad behaviour.You specifically stated 'do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles' yet have provided no diffs and no evidence. That is the definition of a hollow and false accusation. You can do better. Sport and politics (talk)
136
2017-09-04 22:59:57.000000 UTC
7989785650.45749202You have spammed the article with NNPOV, COAT, OR, UNDUE and everything else and this is vandalism. You have commented here outside and demonstrated that attempts to reach consensus with you are futile. This is such a sad state of affairs.Keith-264 (talk)
137
2017-09-04 23:22:05.000000 UTC
7989807880.45333135Phil the linked article states that Budekin pleaded guilty to inciting 15 deaths, but investigators only linked him to 2 deaths. He was only found guilty of inciting 2 deaths. I smell a rat. 88 Boneso (talk)
138
2017-09-04 23:38:02.000000 UTC
7989825010.4482582Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2017 /die /die my face 203.100.7.18 (talk)
139
2017-09-04 04:00:41.000000 UTC
7988415030.4481401Please comment on Talk:Vaginal steaming The is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vaginal steaming. Legobot (talk)
140
2017-09-04 18:41:21.000000 UTC
7989445290.43486935Your lack of command of basic sentence structure, leaves even me, confused as to what you are trying to say...and that's saying something!:With respect to your obsession with the technical phrase station blackout and how that is re-directing to the article "power failure", and from there, you inferring some vast-conspiracy that this is blaming the power grid...sigh. Can you perhaps take a second away from smoking reefer and look at the jumps of sheer conspiratorial fervor you are doing to arrive at this notion?:Thanks. :As the station lost power, it had a power failure end of story. Nothing to do with the power grid. Agreed?:I am reverting your edit again as the sentence you are attempting to inject, is well, total garble-ation.:Boundarylayer (talk)
141
2017-09-04 07:18:55.000000 UTC
7988628670.434227Bernie Sanders is a leftist. If verrit is talking against him and they are not a right wing media organization, it is clear that verrit is a liberal organization.
142
2017-09-04 01:34:38.000000 UTC
7988253210.43179765World celebrated? I have no idea why the sentence "On May 1,1979, the world celebrated the birth of the beefiest piece of beefy beefcake since Vin Campbell, Paul Dunlap" would be included. The world did not celebrate, "beefiest piece of beefy beefcake" is ridiculous and subjective, and who is Paul Dunlap - or Vin Campbell for that matter. The sentence should simply be deleted.203.80.61.102 (talk)
143
2017-09-04 22:07:03.000000 UTC
7989724570.43121183I do not wish to be accused of . World's Lamest Critic (talk)
144
2017-09-04 01:19:46.000000 UTC
7988233960.42851892Untitledmeera is one hell of a actressfirst somebdy put she is born on 1978 then edited....what's going on?is she a budhiya?No, she was born in 1982 and not 1984 as the article claims. This is verified by my friends who were with her in school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.125.222.36 (talk)
145
2017-09-04 01:13:37.000000 UTC
7988224450.42494825Possible Vandalism by a troll This quote is possible vandalism by a troll because Olanzapine is first line in anorexia nervosa - "Evidence does not support the use of atypical antipsychotics including olanzapine in eating disorders." 182.255.99.214 (talk)
146
2017-09-04 13:57:05.000000 UTC
7989044660.421564What I copied is the direct translation. The last sentence is just an explanation of the word YHWH as He is ! you claim that I violated the copyrights by using one sentence ! write me the parts where I copied directly ! Bigot 27 (talk)
147
2017-09-04 06:55:56.000000 UTC
7988609230.42145678Nope, it is UY Scuti.
148
2017-09-04 21:34:32.000000 UTC
7989684540.42118382Kain article is "fringe", at least according to Wikipedia's other articles The most important line of Kain's episode recap in Forbes is probably So why does Wikipedia claim that several of the episodes received widespread acclaim? We need to stop using the Tomatometer for TV episodes. None of these "reviews" are "thumbs up"/"thumbs down" affairs, because that would be ridiculous and stupid. They are all written by long-time fans of the show, who are not going to stop watching, or encourage their readers to stop watching, after investing 60+ hours just because this or that episode was sub-par. RT is therefore not a reliable source for the critical consensus, and we should not be using it. Hijiri 88 (聖やや)
149
2017-09-04 17:51:34.000000 UTC
7989367680.41929147Neo-Nazism "Ableism and Antiziganism" Ok. I took rid of these two hateful beliefs because like I said, Neo-Nazis usually doesn't talk negative about these certain group of people like they do with ethnic minorities like Blacks or Asians, Jews, Homosexuals, and Leftists. Yeah I actually did heard a White Power punk song about some fictional character who I think her name was "Mary" and the singer mentioned she have Down Syndrome, but despite this, Ableism is for the most part a rare topic for them to even bring up in both their Protesting and Music, along-side Antiziganism, which honestly why would they bring-up that like 24/7, like this was the targets of the original Nazis, not these so-called "Modern" Nazis, plus when does these Gypsies even started getting attention during our current generation, like not the 70s, 80s, or 90s, but since like 2001, since 9/11. I just heard in Canada, there were Neo-Nazis protesting against Romani people but back in 1991. So really they might bring-up these groups for the sake of those from WWII, but really it more necessary to just have "Ultranationalism, Racism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, and Antisemitism", because those are what they mainly speaks upon. Ks159081 (talk)
150
2017-09-04 17:50:03.000000 UTC
7989365530.41929147Neo-Nazism "Ableism and Antiziganism"Ok. I took rid of these two hateful beliefs because like I said, Neo-Nazis usually doesn't talk negative about these certain group of people like they do with ethnic minorities like Blacks or Asians, Jews, Homosexuals, and Leftists. Yeah I actually did heard a White Power punk song about some fictional character who I think her name was "Mary" and the singer mentioned she have Down Syndrome, but despite this, Ableism is for the most part a rare topic for them to even bring up in both their Protesting and Music, along-side Antiziganism, which honestly why would they bring-up that like 24/7, like this was the targets of the original Nazis, not these so-called "Modern" Nazis, plus when does these Gypsies even started getting attention during our current generation, like not the 70s, 80s, or 90s, but since like 2001, since 9/11. I just heard in Canada, there were Neo-Nazis protesting against Romani people but back in 1991. So really they might bring-up these groups for the sake of those from WWII, but really it more necessary to just have "Ultranationalism, Racism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, and Antisemitism", because those are what they mainly speaks upon. Ks159081 (talk)
151
2017-09-04 03:36:57.000000 UTC
7988389570.414239This article is a complete joke and provides no historical insight, just politically driven Assyrian ideology.Sr 76 (talk)
152
2017-09-04 16:29:12.000000 UTC
7989255780.41361558It's most likely whoever named him was illiterate and didn't know how to spell Isaiah or saw it spelled that way from another person who was named by someone who too was illiterate.
153
2017-09-04 16:33:17.000000 UTC
7989261450.41330436From your contribution history I see you've been around for a while but not super active as a Wikipedian (this is an observation, not a criticism).* Unfortunately, despite the fine sounding words at, the reality is Wikipedia has more of "civility meme" instead of a functioning civility policy. (See User:NE_Ent/Notes_on_civility for backstory). So, yea, in Wikipedia-as-it-should-be an occasional "Fuck off" shouldn't fly, but as it is we even have a former arbitrator justifying the occasional use of the term User:Beeblebrox/fuck_off. (In fairness, if you look at the failed RFC he put a lot of ultimately unsuccessful effort to help achieve a coherent policy).* Secondly, Bishonen is about the last admin you'd want to complain about Sitush about see the output of the interaction tool] output. Even so, you're entitled to one polite request on an admin's page if they don't want to reply, they don't have to unless applies, and I haven't seen evidence that it does. Specifically ADMINACCT only requires an admin to discuss use of admin tools, not why they didn't do something. (They're volunteers that get the same crappy pay the rest of us do.) * The term "user page" is a misnomer it's not actually yours. (Like everything else around it, it's actually 's). The purpose of the page is to share what you want other users to know about yourself. So you should expect other editors to read it if you attract their curiosity somehow. The place for general boring notes to yourself is your sandbox User:Nfitz/sandbox. and there's not rule use have to just have one. (Mine sandbox is a list of sandboxes, e.g. User:NE Ent/sandbox2, .../sandbox3. etc. The place for dirt you may need on other editors someday is off-wiki e.g. Google Docs or local storage.* A little known fact about ANI is you're not required to reply is someone if talking smack about you their. A even lesser known fact is that it's usually best not to. If an actual admin asks you a direct question, a short, to the point reply is warranted, but otherwise just walking away is best. See User:NE Ent/Unilateral interaction ban.* Wikipedia isn't fair see . If that is inherently something you're not comfortable with long term, you're not going to be happy here long term. That's not meant as the threat it might sound like I'm trying to help you here but just the sad reality of how this place works. We're pretty good at being an encyclopedia and pretty bad at most other things. NE Ent
154
2017-09-04 15:14:35.000000 UTC
7989147720.4112648this article has to be changed!hobbies?! in an article of an ecyclopedia??? no, defently it has no justification to have a passage about ones hobbies. this is irrelevant aqnd trivial!
155
2017-09-04 04:32:27.000000 UTC
7988446220.409034821) The sections you're complaining about are sourced to: Reuters, BBC News, Time Magazine and NPR. To all but the most fringe elements, those are reliable sources. 2) Per, those videos are highly problematic and generally not used, for many reasons - not the least of which, is copyright. 3) You are still incapable of mustering a defense for why your comments were little more than violations. 4) But the fact that you would have the temerity to whine about "democrats" just reveals once more that your only real agenda here is as a POV pusher. Your supposed protestations about "neutrality" are a transparent fraud. The evidence proves your only interest is to use this platform to advance your own political views and to insert them where you can in articles throughout this project. Witness this screed, this comment and so many more. But this one says it all. You're nothing but an unapologetic pov warrior and, in my view, you exemplify everything that's wrong with this project. But the fact that you would base your original criticism on the "unbiasedness of Wikipedia," for me, makes you something far worse than a pov pusher. More depressing, it exposes your incredibly cynical and astoundingly behavior. It also begs the legitimate question of whether your contributions to this project are, or ever could be, constructive. X4n6 (talk)
156
2017-09-04 22:18:03.000000 UTC
7989739230.40493315Twin Peaks Talk PageWhy is it people like you always throw out the troll label when you disagree with someone, rather than having a constructive conversation? You are demoralizing and stigmatizing other wiki users with this poor behavior. This is why my ancestors left Europe, to escape people like you.Dealing with you and your cohort is like being Rodney King on the ground dealing with LA Cops. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:6B4D:A600:F0A0:5F62:D2B3:7FC2 (talk • contribs) 13:36 4 September 2017 (UTC):You have been blocked for multiple personal attacks. Instructions are on your user page for appealing the block. — Maile (talk)
157
2017-09-04 12:06:40.000000 UTC
7988919600.40493196"Blast from the past"? (Before I get to the point, I'm forced to admit I'm impressed with your mechanism to short circuit bitching & moaning about you deleting articles with expired PRODs. It's certainly worked with me!)Howdy. Back in August 2015 you deleted John Young (cinematographer) stating "(Expired PROD, concern was: No obvious notability; run-of-the-mill.)" I understand the "Expired PROD" bit. Given that, among other things, the guy has discovered/identified two new parrots, I don't understand the "No obvious notability; run-of-the-mill" bit. Perhaps if you can put a copy of the deleted article into my user space I can work out whether there is scope to address the notability issue? Your thoughts? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk)
158
2017-09-04 03:04:28.000000 UTC
7988357110.4005109Wrong info The two cops that Kidnapped dent and Rachel, Dent killed the one who kidnapped him while the other one he sparred because his coin landed on the unscarred side, all Dent did to her was knock her out.67.83.60.230 (talk)
159
2017-09-04 21:21:10.000000 UTC
7989666640.39747852Jamie Lee Curtis rumors ::Read . This garbage has repeatedly been excluded from the article and discussed as nauseam on the talk page and at BLPN. Persisting in adding it back against consensus and against policy is only likely to end with your editing privileges restricted. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk)
160
2017-09-04 01:45:37.000000 UTC
7988269810.39633483Kent Hovind/ICR/Discovery Institute/AnswersInGenesis aren't valid sources. You aren't here to have a real discussion; you are here to spew literalist biblical creationism and vandalize the Evolution page with Hovindian nonsense. Wikipedia is not the place for such shenanigans. Please refrain from trying to make it your personal screed against the fact of evolution. - Knight of BAAWA (talk)
161
2017-09-04 23:19:04.000000 UTC
7989805240.3940938It sounds like you disagree with the subject of the bio's religious views. There are many religions that are critical of gay people, most notably fundamental Christianity (Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind it is abomination, neither shalt thou defile thyself with any beast, Leviticus), but I don't see POV tag bombs in the articles on Christianity. There are also religions which are critical of people of African ancestry (mormons claim in the Book of Abraham that black people were cursed by god for joining Satan's rebellion in the pre-existence and were forced to be born "of the accursed lineage of Cain" and were subsequently denied the priesthood in the mormon church until 1978). Some religions, like Islam, claim that all non-believers deserve to be killed ("all infidels must die" is written in the Koran). I don't find the tone all that promotional, and you have not even attempted to edit the article and address those areas. Please do so and help point out these areas. You cannot just sit and bad mouth the article without helping to correct its tone. Octoberwoodland (talk)
162
2017-09-04 08:33:10.000000 UTC
7988701610.3930115Damn it. I should have gotten credit. lol. 71.81.34.121 (talk)
163
2017-09-04 00:55:00.000000 UTC
7988201070.39221364Re: Janus Azucena I know you blocked him per the ANI discussion, but while we did hope he would turn a new leaf and cooperate with us regarding his behaviour, it looks like no amount of messages would convince him - he simply "doesn't give a damn" and would disregard any notices we throw at him. Perhaps Malinaccier was right, an indef block wouldn't hurt for a hardheaded, uncooperative user. Blake Gripling (talk)
164
2017-09-04 23:37:57.000000 UTC
7989824930.39030662Removal of sourced content under questionable pretenses A large amount of text and sources have been repeatedly removed:* This edit ES: statement not found in references The information is in the NYT reference provided.* This edit ES: Statement not in the references The information is in the NYT reference provided.* This edit ES: References are intellectually dishonest and slanderous. Fair critiques are included in references below. Wikipedia editors should be ashamed for allowing this section. Garry Wills appears to be a reputable person. before removing again. Jim1138 (talk)
165
2017-09-04 13:35:39.000000 UTC
7989018930.3889421Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at I watch The Simpsons from the Episode Sideshow Bob's Last GleamingJust then, Abe arrived with his MotorbikeAbe: Hey Everybody, I'm going haul ass to Lollapalooza!Family: Here we go again!20th Century Fox Television DA DA DA DA DA DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jevansen (talk)
166
2017-09-04 13:20:11.000000 UTC
7989001660.3889421Approximately three quarters of the words in this article are about the appearance, size, and shape of breasts. Plastic surgery is given around 600 words, which is more than the number of words on puberty, female sexual pleasure, cancer, and breastfeeding combined. From my perspective as a female reader, these ratios are plainly ludicrous. To make a more conventional Wikipedia argument, the article’s emphasis on breast size and shape, and on cosmetic surgery, is way out of line with how high-quality secondary and tertiary sources on breast health discuss the subject.
167
2017-09-04 08:38:56.000000 UTC
7988706150.3889421You were new to wikipedia at that time? So what are you know? An expert or extended confirmed user or an administer here? If you lose your temper often, then go and take it out on someone else not here. Oh yes, its fair for you to lose temper often because of old age. Not your fault UNCLE! 😛 Pure conSouls (talk)
168
2017-09-04 20:54:59.000000 UTC
7989631250.3889421For anyone considering signing their kids up for an education at Sisley East, let me tell you out of personal experience that there are much better options. The majority of kids that go here have shown to be as snotty and disrespectful as possible, especially the current 9th graders of the time this is published. Quite a few kids have also been caught smoking a couple of different drugs on the schools grounds. Bullying is a giant problem, as punishment is never strict enough for those who bully. Education statistics also show that the elementary program is absolutely horrid, and the high school is only a bit better. In my opinion, Sibley East is a disgrace to Sibley County. K1llCr33per23 (talk)
169
2017-09-04 14:01:44.000000 UTC
7989050470.3889421Hey, Kieron. I think Ira's right that the the the he's talking about should be just a the. I wouldn't bother to interfere except that I wanted to write the "the the the" I just wrote. All the the best to you! EEng
170
2017-09-04 15:35:53.000000 UTC
7989181430.3889421Hi, Serge. It's this person again - "Justinzimmer1398". He's back and adding more hoaxes about fake albums and songs. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justinzimmer868.
171
2017-09-04 01:30:15.000000 UTC
7988247270.3889421Note In german wikipedia both accounts are blocked because auf puppet and spam. Codc (talk)
172
2017-09-04 00:09:19.000000 UTC
7988150730.3889421I also complemented the number of soviet POW death with those in G.I. Krivosheev's study. Krivosheev states, that most of these 3 million killed POWs were not military personnel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union
173
2017-09-04 10:30:35.000000 UTC
7988815640.3889421Let's end this DAMN WAR Hey Pure conSouls, i wanna end this damn war with u , i'm sorry about my aggressive language , but i think u have 2 sorry also . Let's ask Ferret about his opinion at "Officially", and whatever he says , i'll do . And I think that it's unkind to mention the others in another places (except their talk page) and talk about their bad acts -like what u did in Video Games WikiProject-, cuz when u do that , everybody can see what r their errors and violations in the encyclopedia . U could send a message to a certain user, and tell him about what i did .And i think that it's unkind too to make fun of someone's origin , school , or abilities .Anyway , now i wanna end this war and put it behind us , but with a one term : We must ask Ferret or another expert or extended confirmed user to say his/her opinion about the word . TDLWH (talk)
174
2017-09-04 10:28:21.000000 UTC
7988813140.3889421And on a point of order comraid, nonsense is hypenated.Jack Upland (talk)
175
2017-09-04 23:59:39.000000 UTC
7989849380.3889421ZENA BETHUNE WRIGHT JESUS CHRIST MOONCHILD BEAUTY FINCH the 1 St. King HERE. We Have hostage situations here and ABROAD. My draughters her baby daddy and little Lori Taylor McLemore are having sexual relation with the babies feeding them exerce pills starving us and posing us in our meals and drinks. Family members are burring family members alive at ADDRESS:822 Robin Lane Joliet Illinois USA 60432-1048. We are being claimed mammed murdered dismembered disfigured mangled directed and burned alive. PLEASE HELP ! Thanks ! MERRY ! Christmas !from Santa's families CALL ME BACK ! TELE:1 815 483 1548. CAN YOU STANDBY and STATION? OVER and OUT ! ZENA BETHUNE WRIGHT,JESUS CHRIST (talk)
176
2017-09-04 23:20:34.000000 UTC
7989806620.3889421It sounds like you disagree with the subject of the bio's religious views. There are many religions that are critical of gay people, most notably fundamental Christianity (Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind it is abomination, neither shalt thou defile thyself with any beast, Leviticus), but I don't see POV tag bombs in the articles on Christianity. There are also religions which are critical of people of African ancestry (mormons claim in the Book of Abraham that black people were cursed by god for joining Satan's rebellion in the pre-existence and were forced to be born "of the accursed lineage of Cain" and were subsequently denied the priesthood in the mormon church until 1978). Some religions, like Islam, claim that all non-believers deserve to be killed ("all infidels must die" is written in the Koran). I don't find the tone all that promotional, and you have not even attempted to edit the article and address those areas. Please do so and help point out these areas. You cannot just sit and bad mouth the article without helping to correct its tone. The religious beliefs of any group are not strictly POV from an editing standpoint they simply are what they are, and we should write about them in an impartial tone. Octoberwoodland (talk)
177
2017-09-04 03:52:15.000000 UTC
7988406370.3889421Städel
178
2017-09-04 19:19:24.000000 UTC
7989497620.38878992Minimize Serbian Holocaust? What are you talking about?109.92.89.139 (talk)
179
2017-09-04 19:04:37.000000 UTC
7989476470.38866615The cartoon itself is readily available online. In no episode does Goofy make any statement about Max's mother or her fate. The original edits that specifically claimed Goofy's wife/Max's mother to have died prior to Goof Troop were made by some anonymous users without any citation beyond "the cartoon said so", when the cartoon never mentioned her at all. Whereas it absolutely portrayed Goofy as a single father. 75.115.40.71 (talk)
180
2017-09-04 08:07:08.000000 UTC
7988674310.38685852So your from Iraq. I don't care where your studying but I do know that definitely it can't compete with any US or UK school, I don't have time to waste for checking that school's history or other infos. Why don't you edit (and possibly troll) the wikipedia of Iraq and go from here? Pure conSouls (talk)
181
2017-09-04 14:03:52.000000 UTC
7989053080.38478082Why did you enter Dream Bags for speedy deletion? I have contested the speedy deletion, but apparently to no avail as you have just deleted it anyway without any further discussion. Feeling like a dictator, are you? dusoft (talk)
182
2017-09-04 06:36:43.000000 UTC
7988589920.382626August 2017 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at I watch The Simpsons from the Episode Sideshow Bob's Last GleamingJust then, Abe arrived with his MotorbikeAbe: Hey Everybody, I'm going haul ass to Lollapalooza!Family: Here we go again!20th Century Fox Television DA DA DA DA DA DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jevansen (talk)
183
2017-09-04 11:42:44.000000 UTC
7988896160.382626August 2017 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at I watch The Simpsons from the Episode Sideshow Bob's Last GleamingJust then, Abe arrived with his MotorbikeAbe: Hey Everybody, I'm going haul ass to Lollapalooza!Family: Here we go again!20th Century Fox Television DA DA DA DA DA DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jevansen (talk)
184
2017-09-04 09:39:12.000000 UTC
7988759270.38252547Ahem? Chiswick Chap (talk)
185
2017-09-04 22:12:28.000000 UTC
7989730480.3803187BROCCOLI She is also a healthy kid because she smoke broccoli everyday boiiii
186
2017-09-04 21:37:01.000000 UTC
7989688180.38027036Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Little Women, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk)
187
2017-09-04 19:21:07.000000 UTC
7989499960.3794482Minimize Serbian Holocaust? Revisionist attempt? What are you talking about?109.92.89.139 (talk)
188
2017-09-04 05:58:22.000000 UTC
7988535280.37903863IP hopper I've range blocked this irritating IP hopper for two weeks. If you see them pop up on another range, or if they continuing littering unsourced trivial agency info post-block, could you please drop me a note on my talk page? Jezebel's Ponyobons mots
189
2017-09-04 20:08:33.000000 UTC
7989569630.37889925"oppose while Fox to me, as a foreigner, is a ridiculous channel and it's hard to imagine anyone taking them serious, the sources do not justify such a statement, especially in the lead. I hope you find some better sources. In the mean time, i watch an occasional item from Fox when I'm bored with comedy channel and i want a good laugh. But that's irrelevant here. PizzaMan (♨♨)
190
2017-09-04 17:54:40.000000 UTC
7989372460.37852088Ok. I took rid of these two hateful beliefs because like I said, Neo-Nazis usually doesn't talk negative about these certain group of people like they do with ethnic minorities like Blacks or Asians, Jews, Homosexuals, and Leftists. Yeah I actually did heard a White Power punk song about some fictional character who I think her name was "Mary" and the singer mentioned she have Down Syndrome, but despite this, Ableism is for the most part a rare topic for them to even bring up in both their Protesting and Music, along-side Antiziganism, which honestly why would they bring-up that like 24/7, like this was the targets of the original Nazis, but not these so-called "Modern" Nazis, plus when does these Gypsies even started getting attention during our current generation, like not the 70s, 80s, or 90s, but since like 2001, since 9/11. I just heard in Canada, there were Neo-Nazis protesting against Romani people but back in 1991. So really they might bring-up these groups for the sake of those from WWII, but really it more necessary to just have "Ultranationalism, Racism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, and Antisemitism", because those are what they mainly speaks up against.
191
2017-09-04 20:09:02.000000 UTC
7989570330.37769663oppose while Fox to me, as a foreigner, is a ridiculous channel and it's hard to imagine anyone taking them serious, the sources do not justify such a statement, especially in the lead. I hope you find some better sources. In the mean time, i watch an occasional item from Fox when I'm bored with comedy channel and i want a good laugh. But that's irrelevant here. PizzaMan (♨♨)
192
2017-09-04 21:41:38.000000 UTC
7989694620.37720588Your nomination of Kill Em with Kindness (song)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kill Em with Kindness (song) you nominated for -status according to the . This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak Cartoon network freak (talk)
193
2017-09-04 17:53:06.000000 UTC
7989369880.3767963Ok. I took rid of these two hateful beliefs because like I said, Neo-Nazis usually doesn't talk negative about these certain group of people like they do with ethnic minorities like Blacks or Asians, Jews, Homosexuals, and Leftists. Yeah I actually did heard a White Power punk song about some fictional character who I think her name was "Mary" and the singer mentioned she have Down Syndrome, but despite this, Ableism is for the most part a rare topic for them to even bring up in both their Protesting and Music, along-side Antiziganism, which honestly why would they bring-up that like 24/7, like this was the targets of the original Nazis, but not these so-called "Modern" Nazis, plus when does these Gypsies even started getting attention during our current generation, like not the 70s, 80s, or 90s, but since like 2001, since 9/11. I just heard in Canada, there were Neo-Nazis protesting against Romani people but back in 1991. So really they might bring-up these groups for the sake of those from WWII, but really it more necessary to just have "Ultranationalism, Racism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, and Antisemitism", because those are what they mainly speaks upon.
194
2017-09-04 17:00:58.000000 UTC
7989297330.37653193Miksa Pollak
195
2017-09-04 21:17:24.000000 UTC
7989661680.3684691Sounds good. And all this is making me hungry. RivertorchFIREWATER
196
2017-09-04 07:06:11.000000 UTC
7988618020.36545882Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2017 Leftist? The correct adjective is neoliberal.False Choices: The Faux Feminism of Hillary Rodham Clintonedited by Liza Featherstone72.234.244.48 (talk)
197
2017-09-04 19:49:04.000000 UTC
7989540780.36173305Aljazzi
198
2017-09-04 18:55:10.000000 UTC
7989463570.36024326REDIRECT Talk:Uruguayan Jews in Israel
199
2017-09-04 13:00:18.000000 UTC
7988978740.3598168Polish Folk Stop this nonsense, people did not object when you added information that's only loosely related to Poland such as the Fashion and Design section. Yet, you do not allow other so include their contact?? What is wrong with you, sorry this is an article about POLAND not East Prussia. E-960 (talk)
200
2017-09-04 15:00:57.000000 UTC
7989126580.3583981I still don't understand how an ad for a movie is a prize. Or instructions on how to download an app is a prize. Call me old fashioned, but I loved those crappy lick on tattoos. 70.127.248.232 (talk)
201
2017-09-04 22:38:07.000000 UTC
7989760560.35565928You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hey Monie!. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
202
2017-09-04 15:25:09.000000 UTC
7989165700.35389575this is STILL so awkward I don't believe that it is the place of Wikipedia to expand confusion, much less to sow it with assumed authority.In the end, perhaps all related articles would indeed be better folded into subsections of an overarching article such as pseudo-etymology. Until then, there are certainly steps that can be taken to fight the nonsense.Confusion is supported from the very beginning(s)—:Folk etymology… – sometimes called pseudo-etymology, popular etymology…':A false etymology (popular etymology…, pseudo-etymology…), sometimes called folk etymologyHow can a typical WP user NOT be misled by this??My recommendation: for the sake of initial clarity, push all of this "a.k.a." garbage back as far as possible!! I believe it ought to be well into the main body of the article, but certainly no further forward than the final paragraph of the lede.And also put MUCH clearer effort into distinguishing "also sometimes called" from "often erroneously referred to as" terminology. Do this early, and at least allude to it three or four times in the article. Weeb Dingle (talk)
203
2017-09-04 15:24:49.000000 UTC
7989164970.35389575this is STILL so awkward I don't believe that it is the place of Wikipedia to expand confusion, much less to sow it with assumed authority.In the end, perhaps all related articles would indeed be better folded into subsections of an overarching article such as pseudo-etymology. Until then, there are certainly steps that can be taken to fight the nonsense.Confusion is supported from the very beginning(s)—:Folk etymology… – sometimes called pseudo-etymology, popular etymology…':A false etymology (popular etymology…, pseudo-etymology…), sometimes called folk etymologyHow can a typical WP user NOT be misled by this??My recommendation: for the sake of initial clarity, push all of this "a.k.a." garbage back as far as possible!! I believe it ought to be well into the main body of the article, but certainly no further forward than the final paragraph of the lede.And also put MUCH clearer effort into distinguishing "also sometimes called" from "often erroneously referred to as" terminology. Do this early, and at least allude to it three or four times in the article. Weeb Dingle (talk)
204
2017-09-04 21:32:51.000000 UTC
7989682340.3534849Please avoid making personal attacks per as you did in this edit summary. And just one piece of advice, if you want to call someone like Argento Surfer dumb, I would avoid using phrases such as "ligament sources". 73.168.15.161 (talk)
205
2017-09-04 14:01:21.000000 UTC
7989050160.35289675Dream Bags Why did you enter Dream Bags for speedy deletion? I have contested the speedy deletion, but apparently to no avail as you have just deleted it anyway without any further discussion. Feeling like a dictator, are you?
206
2017-09-04 08:00:24.000000 UTC
7988665580.35205647ALEVZOTIXX IS ONE ALBANIAN GOD.AREA: 1.)HEAD.AREA: 2.)HEART.MAKED BY MAD HACKER CODE: JBL15GUARDED BY APOKALYPSE: ANTIGODXXVIX NUMER 15 VIX NAME ALEVZOTIXX.HTTP://ALEVZOTIXX.NPAGE.EU/
207
2017-09-04 21:41:28.000000 UTC
7989694250.35149878Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jimmy Zavala, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
208
2017-09-04 10:05:42.000000 UTC
7988787850.3514393U R always CACKLING bout grammars : blah blah blah ....Don't make yourself Henry Sweet or Otto Jespersen, and if don't know grammars and if i have errors in them , why don't u tell me what R they ? The commas !!!! 😂And if u r saying that my school is a "low-class school", then why the article of it in wikipedia states the opposite !!! , take a "LITTLE" look at these lines :Baghdad College is an elite high school for boys aged 11 to 18 in Baghdad, Iraq. It was initially a Catholic school founded by and operated by American Jesuits from Boston. The 1969 Iraqi government nationalization and expulsion of Jesuit teachers changed the character of the school. It has been compared in the British media to Eton College and is arguably Iraq's most famous secondary school for boys . And if u wanna know the name of the founder, and u think that the school was made by an unimportant people , then take another "LITTLE" look at these lines :Baghdad College was founded in 1932[2]: 228 by William A. Rice, S.J.[3] (who would later become Bishop in Belize, Central America).[4] Pope Pius XI requested the establishment of a Catholic school in Baghdad to serve the Muslim population there, and the church sent four Jesuits to establish the school.[5] One of them was Fr. John Mifsud, who was of Maltese origins. The school originally had four Jesuit teachers and 107 students. The school motto was "An Iraqi School for Iraqi Boys".[2]: 228 . OK Little KID ?
209
2017-09-04 17:55:07.000000 UTC
7989373150.3509655Ok. I took rid of these two hateful beliefs because like I said, Neo-Nazis usually doesn't talk negative about these certain group of people like they do with ethnic minorities like Blacks or Asians, Jews, Homosexuals, and Leftists. Yeah I actually did heard a White Power punk song about some fictional character who I think her name was "Mary" and the singer mentioned she have Down Syndrome, but despite this, Ableism is for the most part a rare topic for them to even bring up in both their Protesting and Music, along-side Antiziganism, which honestly why would they bring-up that like 24/7, like this was the targets of the original Nazis, but not these so-called "Modern" Nazis, plus when does these Gypsies even started getting attention during our current generation, like not the 70s, 80s, or 90s, but since like 2001, since 9/11. I just heard in Canada, there were Neo-Nazis protesting against Romani people but back in 1991. So really they might bring-up these groups for the sake of those from WWII, but really it more necessary to just have "Ultranationalism, Racism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, and Antisemitism", because those are what they mainly speaks up against people with.
210
2017-09-04 19:21:35.000000 UTC
7989500690.3508373This guy is facing some serious mental trouble and need to get treatedSPSKachhwaha (talk)Meet me once, I shall help you in understanding basics which seems difficult for your to understandSPSKachhwaha (talk)For past many years you are insulting our clan and now it seems an appropriate time to teach youSPSKachhwaha (talk)
211
2017-09-04 12:25:06.000000 UTC
7988938590.3506442I am Vandal.
212
2017-09-04 23:53:48.000000 UTC
7989842440.35047066. You're not missing anything - it's my error plain and simple. I've self-reverted. Apologies for inconvenience. - I agree it was my folly. Rectified. Best regards to yous both. Kez.Kieronoldham (talk)
213
2017-09-04 23:39:15.000000 UTC
7989826830.34984094REDIRECT Talk:Murder of Meredith Emerson
214
2017-09-04 22:04:59.000000 UTC
7989722060.34979635Rubbish. It makes no difference to the appearance of the article compared to having separate notes, and it links the notes directly with the citations so making the information more coherently accessible. This gives the reader all the info at their fingertips, without overloading the article text with detail. Separating the citations from the notes would give twice as many links, for no appreciable improvement in readability. Please stop edit-warring. Wdford (talk)
215
2017-09-04 08:38:06.000000 UTC
7988705480.34972245You were new to wikipedia at that time? So what are you know? An expert or extended confirmed user or an administer here? If you lose your temper often, then go and take it out on someone else not here. Yes, its fair for you to lose temper often because of old age. Not your fault UNCLE! 😛 Pure conSouls (talk)
216
2017-09-04 00:29:54.000000 UTC
7988172710.34944052Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Island Farm, you may be blocked from editing. Whispering
217
2017-09-04 02:06:32.000000 UTC
7988292440.34940228hello my viewers i amm so happy to see you
218
2017-09-04 00:22:51.000000 UTC
7988165160.34924906Arabic Unicode Why Arabic script has duplicate glyphs? cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk Contributions)
219
2017-09-04 03:09:40.000000 UTC
7988361780.3490823@Activist it is partisan vandalism. Page protection needed. Quis separabit?
220
2017-09-04 18:25:36.000000 UTC
7989422660.34868586External links modified Hello fellow Wikipedians,I have just modified one external link on Slick Idiot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130326114539/http://www.verbavision.com/slick-idiot.html to http://www.verbavision.com/slick-idiot.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug)
221
2017-09-04 15:23:39.000000 UTC
7989162480.3486544Hi, Serge. It's this person again - "Justinzimmer1398". He's back and adding more hoaxes about fake albums and songs. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justinzimmer868. — Zawl
222
2017-09-04 04:16:36.000000 UTC
7988430890.34839734You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at MCC. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
223
2017-09-04 00:03:11.000000 UTC
7988142710.34835142Yad Vashem I have added an additional sentence to the quote from Yad Vashem about the total Jewish death toll, to remove the possible misreading that Yad Vashem claims only three million Jews were killed. TheWhangdepootenawah (talk)
224
2017-09-04 23:53:21.000000 UTC
7989841890.34793273Photographic evidence of a "Hot dog" in a baseball stadium prior to all these dates would suffice. Oh wait, it doesn't exist? oh right. Oogles (talk)
225
2017-09-04 02:15:23.000000 UTC
7988301690.3473664innocent/ guiltyI have recently read another source regarding Irma Grese http://www.scrapbookpages.com/bergenbelsen/BergenBelsen09.html that she might be innocent and victimized as a nazi sadist by the allied force for exaggerating the sadism inside concentration camp.It was noted that there were no evidence of the inmates she had killed, nor is there any proof that she did any selection or dog biting. It seems that the court had pre-disposition of ruling them guilty in mind prior to trials. It's very hard to hide your crime in a camp with 30000 inmates becoz anyone could pin-point at what you have exactly done, but the testimonies that some *witness* gave were so ambiguous and the rest inmates insisted that she didn't commit any serious crimes.It's highly suspicious that she committed any serious crimes, a few whipping maybe, as she admitted, which was understandable in a prison environment. I had internal feeling that she might had be a victim of demonizing any persons involving in the concentration camp by the occupied allie force for propaganda purpose.One more doubt that chimes inside my head is that, if she really committed any serious war crime, why did she remain at the camp and not fleeing or commit suicide? Those Nazi criminals had been flew away long before the allied forces had arrived... I had feeling that this girl was innocent given the supportive documents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.236.46 (talk)
226
2017-09-04 16:35:54.000000 UTC
7989264890.34628895I'll put this here as well as at ANI so you can't claim not to have seen it Regarding your personal attacks on other editors and your making accusations of misconduct against other editors without providing evidence, if you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I completely understand that English is not your first language, but this is the English-language Wikipedia, but that doesn't absolve you from en-wiki's rules. If you don't have the ability to edit in English without spewing insults and unfounded accusations, I strongly suggest you don't attempt it. ‑ Iridescent
227
2017-09-04 13:04:10.000000 UTC
7988982990.34613606Bruce Wayne? Born in Prilep?! Don't make me laugh! Audi1merc2 (talk)
228
2017-09-04 13:04:01.000000 UTC
7988982760.34613606Bruce Wayne? Born in Prilep?! Don't make me laugh!Audi1merc2 (talk)
229
2017-09-04 07:06:15.000000 UTC
7988618120.34540558You also made fun of my name, UNCLE! Maybe its not your fault, old guys become the cause of irritation and can't understand fastly enough compare to young guys. Don't worry there should be schools around you who can teach English, politeness and proper grammar to old people, you should find that type of school for you, maybe they will sympathise with you. UNCLE 😆 Pure conSouls (talk)
230
2017-09-04 23:51:19.000000 UTC
7989839490.34435195That's a very old account, by the way. But I see your point. I don't post as Grace Saunders any more, because of all the people following me around online giving me grief, but it's the name of a character in Alone in the Dark 2 and I'm a fan of survival horror games. When I used that Wikipedia account to contribute to articles on here, I did not disturb anybody's peace, and I never spammed either. My banning was a "work" perpetrated by trolls. It was because a corrupt moderator (who has since been banned), created a dubious sock puppet investigation that was largely fabricated to make them look good. He contributed to a page about me on Encyclopedia Dramatica which looks like Wikipedia, but is actually very abusive. So technically, my banning was instigated by them making attention seeking sock puppet investigation posts, and my ban was not widely warranted. PeterMan844 (talk) Type "Grace Saunders" on Google. It has a link to Encyclopedia Dramatica on a Russian server, because they are forced to relocate over and over again.As you can see from the editing history both there and here on Wikipedia, User:Snaisybelle and User:Michaeldsuarez made a huge stink about me to get me banned, and the administrators fell for it. The people on that site are criminals, and they've been harassing me for nearly 10 years. It's hard to find out who their hosting provider is as well, as they pay a site to obscure their details on the sites that tell you who is running what site on certain databases.
231
2017-09-04 18:50:36.000000 UTC
7989457500.3439028Now User:MartinGugino Martin, with respect to your obsession with the technical phrase station blackout and how that is re-directing to the article "power failure", and from there, you inferring some vast conspiracy that this is blaming the power grid...can you perhaps take a second away from smoking reefer and look at the jumps of sheer conspiratorial fervor you are doing to arrive at this notion?:I would revert your edit again if you try to change it, as the sentence you are attempting to re-instate, is well, total garble-ation.
232
2017-09-04 19:12:54.000000 UTC
7989487340.34382862Sockpuppetry You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saeedkhanbozdar786. Thank you. Pillowfluffyhead (talk)
233
2017-09-04 19:13:34.000000 UTC
7989488270.34382862Sockpuppetry You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saeedkhanbozdar786. Thank you. Pillowfluffyhead (talk)
234
2017-09-04 20:48:38.000000 UTC
7989623580.34246674It has been brought to my attention that this redirect to Osama bin Laden may not be NPOV and might even be racist. Making this a disambiguation page would be a way to make this more within Wikipedia's NPOV guidelines and perhaps less racist. Morganfitzp (talk)
235
2017-09-04 13:09:56.000000 UTC
7988989550.34236488REDIRECT Talk:NUTS statistical regions of Malta
236
2017-09-04 05:59:45.000000 UTC
7988536950.3421358hi what is your name im awesome*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828103713/http://mbe.oupjournals.org/cgi/reprint/14/5/589 to http://mbe.oupjournals.org/cgi/reprint/14/5/589 gay
237
2017-09-04 10:29:48.000000 UTC
7988814820.3413654I will again say, Be civil. This kind of conduct will only harm you. Rest, you know better. Thanks, Greenbörg (talk)
238
2017-09-04 17:45:11.000000 UTC
7989358550.34123963Constant harassment deters users as well. 68.129.15.71 (talk)
239
2017-09-04 05:56:21.000000 UTC
7988532910.3407833I must say, Esen-Baur makes a very poor case for Dietrich. It amounts to little more than I claim it, therefore it's true. I mean, "inverse boustrophedon makes sense only in terms of a celestial notation system" is almost silly beyond belief. So we have someone positing a hypothesis with no confirmatory evidence, and then a reviewer that swallows it who is either completely ignorant of the history of writing, or who only comprehends what he wants to believe. This is not promising. — kwami (talk)
240
2017-09-04 14:04:40.000000 UTC
7989054020.3407584You haven't been bullied - you have walked into a community where maturity and professionalism are basic expectations. Once you realize that it will be much easier. You were blocked because you were harming the encyclopedia by attempting to claim that people who were patiently helping you were "enemies." That kind of perception is a symptom of immaturity, and your failure to understand that it's not acceptable (and your demand that you should be warned for doing something obviously unacceptable) is a clear sign that you might not be ready to do useful work here. You're clearly smart and willing to try things, but I strongly advise you to take it slowly and not to make assumptions that someone who criticizes your actions is an enemy. Acroterion (talk)
241
2017-09-04 20:41:05.000000 UTC
7989613310.34036458Asiatic Exclusion League The newsletter ("proceedings") published by a white supremacist group may be a reliable source for the group's views, but it is not a reliable source for facts. See . Now stop edit-warring and argue your case at . — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk
242
2017-09-04 09:30:41.000000 UTC
7988750670.33937192Eating parts of humans is cannibalism. The placenta is a part of the human body; no discussion there. In this context, it does not matter if animals eat placentas.
243
2017-09-04 13:23:00.000000 UTC
7989004650.3392541You deleted chunks of RELATED information. YOU HAVE THIS AREA TO DISCUSS THIS. Please do or I'll report you. The da Vinci was fine. Matejko's Constitution can be added. Oliszydlowski, .
244
2017-09-04 16:40:35.000000 UTC
7989271220.33537856September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taio Cruz, this IP will be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit?
245
2017-09-04 23:49:12.000000 UTC
7989837540.33296025Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Live Earth, you may be blocked from editing. timawesomeness ⟨talk⟩
246
2017-09-04 21:19:30.000000 UTC
7989664530.33095828A goat for you! Thank you for the numbered lists tutorial.Whispering
247
2017-09-04 19:11:57.000000 UTC
7989486040.33002344Some members are actually antifa supporters like: Bobfrombrockley, who edits the Antifa page regularly and calls himself an antifa supporter in his biography. I have huge respect for him just for recognizing his own bias. I also have respect for your overt bias as a Humanist in your biography. I have mostly strayed from editing the content of political articles until fairly recently, so I haven't put down my own biases. Most editors who edit on a certain topic care immensely about it. This is not their fault. If they support Antifa, say it out loud. I don't know if GorillaWarfare supports antifa, I was just mad people keep vandalizing Wikipedia for their own biases. This is why teachers hate this site (if you have been working in a school project) so much. It is just edit warring all over the place.
248
2017-09-04 09:14:19.000000 UTC
7988736210.32988423Regardless of how he communicated his point you have done nothing to justify the omission. You evidently don't understand what "goyim" means if you think that it is an anti-semetic slur; the word has nothing to due with the Jewish people and refers to the non-Jews. Even if he presented his argument in a derogatory manner it does not invalidate his point and you are still responsible to offer a rationale for why there exists an omission. Administrative duties do not imply a hierarchy where their edits may have preference over any other user without explanation. SwegWrestlur (talk)
249
2017-09-04 18:31:47.000000 UTC
7989431240.32795405Oops Oops, I'm sorry about this. I think the CMOS battery in my brain has expired. Apologies, and I've removed the "spare" one ... the poor s*d must have felt somewhat piled on! Cheers DBaK (talk)
250
2017-09-04 20:08:05.000000 UTC
7989568910.32766777Do you want me to lie or tell the truth.im not the one hour lie of thamthing what never happen you people believe atherosclerosis people who lie of thamthing and now every body must believe it.paul walker is not dead he is alive ,bryan walker is dead now tell me is that true or falls. Someone is living ho is lining.
251
2017-09-04 18:39:39.000000 UTC
7989442790.32611993Now User:MartinGugino Martin, with respect to your obsession with the technical phrase station blackout and how that is re-directing to the article "power failure", and from there, you inferring some vast conspiracy that this is blaming the power grid...can you perhaps take a second away from smoking reefer and perhaps look at the jumps of sheer conspiratorial fervor you are doing to arrive at this notion?
252
2017-09-04 19:15:50.000000 UTC
7989491720.3254671Some members are actually antifa supporters like: Bobfrombrockley, who edits the Antifa page regularly and calls himself an antifa supporter in his biography. I have huge respect for him just for recognizing his own bias. I also have respect for your overt bias as a Humanist in your biography. I have mostly strayed from editing the content of political articles until fairly recently, so I haven't put down my own biases. Most editors who edit on a certain topic care immensely about it. This is not their fault. If they support Antifa, say it out loud. I don't know if GorillaWarfare supports antifa, I was just mad people keep vandalizing Wikipedia for their own biases. This is why teachers hate this site (if you have been working in a school project) so much. It is just edit warring all over the place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fierysunset (talk • contribs)
253
2017-09-04 01:31:45.000000 UTC
7988249060.32442123Note In german wikipedia both accounts Leylapr2 and Mohammadghpr2 are blocked because of there are puppets and spam. Codc (talk)
254
2017-09-04 03:22:14.000000 UTC
7988373560.32349807You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sasha Banks. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
255
2017-09-04 18:59:31.000000 UTC
7989469890.3210267The cartoon itself is readily available online. In no episode does Goofy make any statement about Max's mother or her fate. The original edits that specifically claimed Goofy's wife/Max's mother to have died prior to Goof Troop were made by some anonymous users without any citation beyond "the cartoon said so", when the cartoon never mentioned her at all. 75.115.40.71 (talk)
256
2017-09-04 03:03:39.000000 UTC
7988356160.32064787You accusing others of not assuming good faith = not possibly an attack. People pointing out that your accusations may not assume good faith about those you accuse: always an attack. Am I misunderstanding? ScratchMarshall (talk)
257
2017-09-04 21:48:21.000000 UTC
7989702930.32014185lol, honest mistake, funny because the article is weed related. I will fix immediately.MickeyDangerez (talk)
258
2017-09-04 21:24:36.000000 UTC
7989671470.32014185lol, honest mistake, funny because the article is weed related. I will fix immediately.MickeyDangerez (talk)
259
2017-09-04 02:26:59.000000 UTC
7988315110.31998926Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black Saturday bushfires, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
260
2017-09-04 04:07:52.000000 UTC
7988422610.31970847This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk!
261
2017-09-04 01:15:38.000000 UTC
7988227540.31957012Done SparklingPessimist Scream at me!
262
2017-09-04 02:32:58.000000 UTC
7988321650.31916907A heady brew of OR, denial, V-fails and personal disparagement. I'd say less than a dozen living humans now believe that Trump fired Comey acting on a recommendation from Rosenstein. The fact that half of the 12 are here active on this talk page doesn't make it worth anything. Fake news with fringe fries. User:SPECIFICO SPECIFICOUser_talk:SPECIFICO talk
263
2017-09-04 16:47:17.000000 UTC
7989280100.31857875September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Coagh ambush, this IP will be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit?
264
2017-09-04 09:27:40.000000 UTC
7988747860.31803098Africa, still going strong The practice of cannibalism has never died out on the African continent https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/29/5-arrested-in-alleged-south-africa-cannibalism-ring-after-man-walks-into-police-station-saying-hes-tired-of-eating-human-flesh/?utm_term=.6b16582f651d
265
2017-09-04 04:43:26.000000 UTC
7988458690.31784293Note: You just got unblocked and you still making the same disruptive edits without explaining why. If you don't response to your fellow editors next time, I will report you at and have you blocked again. The articles was just fine as it is, you don't need to change it, only if necessary. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk)
266
2017-09-04 23:44:21.000000 UTC
7989832380.3178299You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cavecanem101]]. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk)
267
2017-09-04 01:15:39.000000 UTC
7988227580.31731927No problem I am a Stalker after all ^-^. Also I think my comment was archived but there was a sock puppet on your page a few days ago and I have no clue how to deal with them or report them... ♠Dinah♠ 🎤
268
2017-09-04 16:08:31.000000 UTC
7989226710.314991Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Holy orders in the Catholic Church, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk)
269
2017-09-04 03:05:44.000000 UTC
7988358270.3143392September 2017September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Louie Gohmert, this IP will be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit?
270
2017-09-04 02:36:32.000000 UTC
7988325700.3136776You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cult. — nihlus kryik  (talk)
271
2017-09-04 01:54:28.000000 UTC
7988279190.3129778Maginot Line redux I have pulled the below conversation out of the archive, as it still seems relevant.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) * * * * *
272
2017-09-04 20:50:58.000000 UTC
7989626430.31280154Wikipedia has become so biased, it is utterly shameful. Especially, extremely Anglo-Saxon biased. Take the article about William the Conqueror and his invasion of England, the entire article and series of related articles is twisted so as to give no credit or indication that this was in fact a Frank (French) invasion and taking over of the British Isles. Normans, were and still are French, for they are Northmen (that came as Vikings) who mixed with the Franks. If this wasn't so, if William and his invasion wasn't French, why would the Kings of England later be claiming rights to the French Crown? And if Guillaume le Conquérant (William) was not indeed a Norman FRANK, a Frenchman in short, then why does the British crown still today have a French motto: "Dieu et mon Droit". That is neither Saxon, English, Scottish, Norwegian/Scandinavian, or any other language but FRENCH.Research your history properly, stay unbiased and factual, portray every nation and people's achievements, leaders and victories as you do the British and Anglo-Saxon Protestant ones. And maybe, I won't have to waste my time editing your shameful mistakes. You welcome, by the way!
273
2017-09-04 02:46:11.000000 UTC
7988337650.31182632"Sexual crimes" section , the content under the "Sexual crimes" section states: "''Sharī'ah law makes a distinction between adultery and rape and applies different rules''". This IMO warrants a separate section for rape. Even more so, now that there is a dedicated article on the subject, Sexual Violation in Islamic Law (which you also have removed the link to without an explanation).The claim that "rape is zina" is false. Even advocates of the zina POV have classified it under a separate name, calling it zinā bī al-ikrāh, or "coerced zina", and as stated above, it was understood to be different from consensual zina. Not to mention, there are jurists who have classified it under hirabah, a entirely separate offence.I also think Eperoton's sub-headings (Traditional jurisprudence, History, Modern Laws) were quite useful. Made the section more readable. Al-Andalusi (talk)
274
2017-09-04 12:10:25.000000 UTC
7988923400.31147432You're wrong, there's no requirement to discuss removals first. Especially not such atrocious ones as yours was once you left that comment. Nil Einne (talk)
275
2017-09-04 12:48:51.000000 UTC
7988965860.3110477Doug WellerI think problem is with Homo Erectus because I have 3 reliable sources about age of the shelter.Recently I added another one.IndianEditor (talk)
276
2017-09-04 12:47:02.000000 UTC
7988963790.31100914Blatant spam. About a German company, posted into Wikipedia in Chinese. We get a lot of this kind of thing. We don't fix it. We delete it and block the creator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)
277
2017-09-04 23:48:14.000000 UTC
7989836600.30973023Hello.That's a very old account, by the way. But I see your point. I don't post as Grace Saunders any more, because of all the people following me around online giving me grief, but it's the name of a character in Alone in the Dark 2 and I'm a fan of survival horror games. When I used that Wikipedia account to contribute to articles on here, I did not disturb anybody's peace, and I never spammed either. My banning was a "work" perpetrated by trolls. It was because a corrupt moderator who has since been banned, creating a sock puppe investigation that was fabricated. He contributed to a page about me on Encyclopedia Dramatica which looks like Wikipedia, but is very abusive. So technically, my banning was instigated by them making attention seeking sock puppet investigation posts, and my ban was not widely warranted. PeterMan844 (talk)
278
2017-09-04 02:48:46.000000 UTC
7988341060.3097031Still unfair!! Quinton Feldberg (talk)
279
2017-09-04 19:57:19.000000 UTC
7989551810.30919647External links modified Hello fellow Wikipedians,I have just modified 2 external links on Dare to Be Stupid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203145148/http://www.weirdal.com/awards.htm to http://www.weirdal.com/awards.htm*Corrected formatting/usage for http://theview.abc.go.com/staff/Whoopi-Goldberg/bioWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug)
280
2017-09-04 13:18:51.000000 UTC
7989000060.30913386A vandal messed with the bot's run page, and started the bot up on dewiki. That's probably the cause of the weirdness. Nevertheless, the bot isn't approved on dewiki yet and is shut off until it is approved.—CYBERPOWER (Chat)
281
2017-09-04 14:51:05.000000 UTC
7989113530.30818787Clearly an improvement but you do realize that this forces me into a massive retaliation on your user page, don't you? Carptrash (talk)
282
2017-09-04 00:30:02.000000 UTC
7988172880.30807957Rather uncivil of you to bring up civility when I've been very civil! UaMaol (talk)
283
2017-09-04 09:53:26.000000 UTC
7988775550.3079955Stop editing! stop edit. 212.94.223.32 (talk)
284
2017-09-04 10:18:44.000000 UTC
7988801370.3079955Stop editing! stop edit. 212.94.223.32 (talk)
285
2017-09-04 10:19:42.000000 UTC
7988803130.3079955Stop editing! stop edit. 212.94.223.32 (talk)
286
2017-09-04 09:33:04.000000 UTC
7988752830.30785787Sockpuppet case against 118 alexA sockpuppet investigation has been opened against 118 alex again. The crucial evidence lies in the page you deleted at 05:22 today. This is to inform you that you may need to testify that the accounts involved in this present case threatened to sockpuppet and vandalise Wikipedia after successfully hacking into the 2 locked accounts. The link is at [].
287
2017-09-04 04:23:25.000000 UTC
7988436880.30769032You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pliny the Younger. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
288
2017-09-04 17:22:11.000000 UTC
7989328040.30690542User1 = Bcschneider53 U1-EH = no U1-declared = yesUser2 = CollegeCommGC U2-EH = yes U2-declared = no
289
2017-09-04 19:35:37.000000 UTC
7989522710.30660996What are you doing ... ... on a number of pages related to Contemporary slavery? You can't run through articles whose content you personally don't like, flouting WP policy, and deleting content willy nilly. Be warned. Fowler&fowler«Talk»
290
2017-09-04 23:07:43.000000 UTC
7989794110.30656886This articel needs to get in order Could we please get this article in some sensible order? Why is Polentarion allowed to ruin it with his/her weird ideas? The English-language Wikipedia is in many ways the greatest storage repository of human knowledge. It should have a sensible entry on scientific skepticism.Paleolithic Brain (talk)
291
2017-09-04 18:13:56.000000 UTC
7989404470.30655447hmmm, I don't think I got what you meant. What is your issue? イヴァンスクルージ九十八(会話)
292
2017-09-04 02:26:00.000000 UTC
7988313960.3061253Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cult, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
293
2017-09-04 00:07:19.000000 UTC
7988148660.30611014I also complemented the number of soviet POW death with those in G.I. Krivosheev's study. Krivosheev states, that most of these 3 million POWs were not military personnel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union 2003:D1:B3D0:E301:D8EA:DF47:7B4D:517 (talk)
294
2017-09-04 07:38:57.000000 UTC
7988645770.30576465Sent: 30/08/2017 21:56:32 GMT Daylight Time Subj: Re: Kirchhoff’s Law: a problemMr. ‘t Hooft,No matter how many times you invoke your ignominious “crackpot folder” argument, it will never be a scientific one.You lost the argument on scientific grounds, not because you “gave up”. You failed to adduce a single rational argument. People will now be given the opportunity to examine your remarks and those of Mr. White and myself so that they can decide for themselves. Crothers
295
2017-09-04 19:54:19.000000 UTC
7989547830.3056458Somali Propaganda Somalis are obsessed with this Batu thing and different appearances of various Africans. This article called them Bantu, but also said not to confuse them with the Swahili Bantus? Either all are Bantu or they are not - you cannot pick and choose who you want to favor based on a history.
296
2017-09-04 12:24:48.000000 UTC
7988938180.30542952The SPLC tracks U.S. hate groups, which excludes the the Soviet Communist Party and the German Nazi party for that matter. While an argument could be made that some Communist mass killings were motivated by ethnic hatred, no left-wing group in the U.S. victimizes minority groups. See for example the Communist Party of the USA's recent article, "White nationalism in Trump administration," where they openly denounce "scapegoating of racial and religious minorities, and homophobia." The SPLC does not track organized crime groups, serial killers, fraudsters, polluters and many others who carry out anti-social activitiees. TFD (talk)
297
2017-09-04 06:07:19.000000 UTC
7988548320.3051621Well that's a shame, Mandruss, seriously, because given the dynamics of the situation the solution you outline is the only one which makes any sense and has any chance of success. Perhaps someone else will take up the cause. Marteau (talk)
298
2017-09-04 20:06:42.000000 UTC
7989566870.30515215Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carolina Reaper, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk)
299
2017-09-04 15:36:06.000000 UTC
7989181790.30494317Marijuana It looks like this drug it can make you worse if you overdose symptoms is like dizziness, Muscle Relaxation, Nausea and Vomiting, dry month, and Fever all be using more natural instead. Recreational Becareful its for Medical Use Only it. Got me to Experience this that's why is illegal in some states. Rene131 (talk)
300
2017-09-04 01:44:08.000000 UTC
7988267550.30478606Re-direct to "Yorkshire Ripper" Ladies and germs, I suggest we redirect this page to "Yorkshire Ripper." This is what this man was known as when he committed his crimes.Any comments?Ananagram (talk)
301
2017-09-04 04:39:59.000000 UTC
7988455750.30445406Death of Shiv Kumar Batalvi The death section first states that he died in the PGIMER Hospital, Chandigarh but then in the very next sentence he's stated to have not died in the hospital but in a village. Where did he really die? •nix•
302
2017-09-04 23:15:06.000000 UTC
7989801140.3042975This is quite ridiculous. The house is called Clandon Park in every reliable source back to the 19th century at least Burke's Peerage, 1865, including its own website National Trust Clandon Park, and that of the National Heritage List for England Historic England list entry. Clandon House is a block of student flats in Finchley occupied by the University of London University of London, Clandon House. If the estate surrounding Clandon Park is notable enough to have an independent article, then the title for that should be Clandon Park Estate. The opinion of a couple of Wikipedia users should not be permitted to override the facts. Ghughesarch (talk)
303
2017-09-04 17:22:01.000000 UTC
7989327800.30424777You obviously didn't even bother to perform a cursory check of the validity of your search. Google results for "Gando China" are mostly false hits for the unrelated Gando in Qinghai Province (see, the first result that comes up), as well as non-notable people and companies named Gando. That's why I limit my search term to "Manchuria" (filters out Qinghai, Tibet, etc.) and use Google books (filters out most non-notable garbage on the web). -Zanhe (talk)
304
2017-09-04 19:31:03.000000 UTC
7989514820.30400243Color me unsurprised to learn that you are in high school.Jorm (talk)
305
2017-09-04 15:00:40.000000 UTC
7989126190.30362606You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Disney's Animal Kingdom. Rockypedia (talk)
306
2017-09-04 08:15:33.000000 UTC
7988686650.30293927This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Davide Zappacosta, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (vandal as and ) Matthew_hk tc
307
2017-09-04 05:26:20.000000 UTC
7988503610.3025454Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2017 Stating that Milo is associated with the Alt-Right is utterly false and slanderous. He has stated countless times that he has nothing to do with them, and the alt-right has stated themselves that Milo is one of their biggest enemies. Milo constantly denounces the alt-right, and the ideals for which they stand. I hope to see this false information duly corrected, because I like Wikipedia and want to continue to believe that this site has at least a shred of credibility and integrity. Thanks for understanding. 2600:6C58:7F80:34A:8CA1:9E60:ECCF:92C4 (talk)
308
2017-09-04 19:23:45.000000 UTC
7989504060.302392September 2017September 2017 This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again as you did at Jimmy Fallon, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Quis separabit?
309
2017-09-04 18:23:41.000000 UTC
7989419890.30168113Yes, I know a lot of people do not think about what they say. A lot of people think "alien spaceship" and "little green men" are a logical consequence of "I do not know what that was". But that is their problem, not mine. When somebody says "I saw a UFO" we cannot conclude he is one of those simpletons. Hob Gadling (talk)
310
2017-09-04 23:44:33.000000 UTC
7989832580.30164087You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cavecanem101. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk)
311
2017-09-04 23:43:34.000000 UTC
7989831530.30164087You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/casename. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk)
312
2017-09-04 04:53:27.000000 UTC
7988468090.30163947AfD not "far-right" The only well known far-right party in Germany remains the NPD who clearly includes a fascist Hitler endorsing wing being anti-constitution, endorsing a fourth Reich and using sometimes even violence as a tool for political gain.The AfD at the top supports Israel, Nato, the rule of law and opposes any kind of violence against political opponents. The AfD leader in Bavaria, Petr Bryston, is born in the Czech Republic and came to Germany as a refugee himself. You also can find many people from eastern Europe living in Germany supporting the AfD and secular Persians doing the same as well. Achille Demagbo, a black person, got elected as a party executive in the most northern state in Germany, Schleswig-Holstein. Also the party manages to achieve massive support within the group of Russian-Germans.The AfD overall tends to be more a free-market liberal, christian-conservative, law and order, patriotic party rather than a nationalistic one.
313
2017-09-04 12:34:26.000000 UTC
7988949490.301604You should know that nationalists are capable of endless self delusion. The general claim is that Cornwall sends £300 million a year more to Westminister than they get back (really I think they cribbed UKIP's Brexit pamphlets here). The Lib Dems were (until recent Tory gains) the dominant political force, but tend not to commission press attacks criticism on Cornish Nationalists (for fear of losing loony local support I guess). I'm not aware of any serious reports on how Cornwall would fare as a separate country, just lots of people who want to it to become the new Channel islands and lots of people who think that if the bloody English basterds dropped dead left then everyone could happily live in huts made of sheep dung. A Guy into Books (talk)
314
2017-09-04 02:03:31.000000 UTC
7988288810.30149102I smell B.S.::Typical British exaggeration ... Wikipedia is no place for or ideas of this kind. See also where it explains neutral point of view, one of the pillars of Wikipedia. Dolphin (t)
315
2017-09-04 10:20:12.000000 UTC
7988803700.30147237Untitled The child abuse that took place at this school needs to be mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.226.244.25 (talk)
316
2017-09-04 20:11:17.000000 UTC
7989573350.30135188Re: warning that article might be deleted due to lack of content I am working in Sandbox and, in line with Wikipedia guidelines, I assumed that I could save an incomplete article and revisit it to add material and citations at a later date. I also read on a Wikipedia website that editors should delete this warning if they are working on draft articles in Sandbox. Any further problems, please advise. Regards, Roget's Minion (talk) Ok, I have no idea what the hell this about Do you want me to lie or tell the truth.im not the one hour lie of thamthing what never happen you people believe atherosclerosis people who lie of thamthing and now every body must believe it.paul walker is not dead he is alive ,bryan walker is dead now tell me is that true or falls. Someone is living ho is lining.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.115.105.249 (talk • contribs)
317
2017-09-04 09:37:00.000000 UTC
7988756890.30132416Aftermath=AnalysisItalian perspective: "Will you be worthy of it?"=King-Emperor Victor Emmanuel III waited for the crowds in the Quirinal Palace on Quirinal Hill. Months earlier, when the Ethiopian adventure first started, he told a friend: "If we win, I shall be King of Abyssinia. If we lose, I shall be King of Italy."Time magazine, "Re ed Imperatore", 18 May 1936 "Emperor! Emperor! Salute the Emperor!" ("Imperatore! Imperatore! Salute Imperatore!") chanted the crowd when Victor Emmanuel, in full Army uniform, showed himself on a balcony. The first Emperor in Rome in hundreds of years raised his withered hand to the visor of his cap and said nothing. Elena, his Queen-Empress, did not appear. She was in bed with a broken toe from falling off a stepladder in her library while reaching for a book.Time, "Re ed Imperatore", 18 May 1936From his balcony, Mussolini proclaimedThe crowds would not let him go—ten times they recalled Mussolini to the balcony and cheered and waved while the boys of various Fascist youth organisations sang the newly composed 'Hymn of the Empire' (''Inno dell'impero)."Four days later, the same scene was repeated when Il Duce'' in a speech about the "shining sword" and the "fatal hills of Rome" announcedWhile the Italian people were rejoicing in Rome, Haile Selassie sailed from Djibouti on 4 May, he had sailed from Djibouti in the British cruiser . From Mandatory Palestine Selassie sailed to Gibraltar en route for Britain. In Jerusalem, Haile Selassie sent a telegram to the League of Nations,The Ethiopian Emperor's telegram caused several nations temporarily to defer recognition of the Italian conquest.On 30 June, Selassie spoke at the League of Nations and was introduced by the President of the Assembly as "His Imperial Majesty, the Emperor of Ethiopia" ("''Sa Majesté Imperiale, l'Empereur d'Ethiopie''"). A group of jeering Italian journalists began yelling insults and had to be ejected before he could speak. The Romanian chairman, Nicolae Titulescu, jumped to his feet and shouted "Show the savages the door!" ("A la porte les sauvages!").Selassie denounced Italian aggression and criticised the world community for standing by. At the conclusion of his speech, which appeared on newsreels throughout the world, he said "It is us today. It will be you tomorrow".France appeased Italy because it could not afford to risk an alliance between Italy and Germany; Britain decided its military weakness meant it had to follow France's lead. Selassie's resolution to the League to deny recognition of the Italian conquest was defeated and he was denied a loan to finance a resistance movement. On 4 July 1936, the League voted to end the sanctions imposed against Italy in November 1935 and by 15 July, the sanctions were at an end.On 18 November 1936,
318
2017-09-04 08:37:43.000000 UTC
7988705120.3012891Ughhh, I don't see why anyone should push anyone else into not pluralizing an initialism just because the last initial happens to be the same letter as the one used to form the plural. There's no reasonable logic in that at all, which is why our other so-called "editors" have refused to discuss it: the simple matter is that they're just not able to back themselves up with any kind of sound logic. Simply put, it has nothing better than "We're just not used to hearing it that way" written all over it. That's not a good reason to not allow it, because it's logically senseless from all angles.:::::Psst... they're not discussing it, but they're not reverting it anymore, either. So... because it still is the way we both like it, I'd say just let the sleeping dogs lie now. ;-) Oh, except... what about reporting regushee for both the uncivil behavior of falsely calling us "trolls" and the uncivil behavior of refactoring nearly the whole of one of my replies here into nothingness with his reply, which, had I done, other editors would've been all over me for?:::::75.162.203.137 (talk)
319
2017-09-04 11:05:14.000000 UTC
7988855120.30126166RE: Andrew Rannells; Stephanie J. Block Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Flami72 (talk)
320
2017-09-04 00:50:08.000000 UTC
7988195870.3012239Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Socialist Movement (United States), you may be blocked from editing. — nihlus kryik  (talk)
321
2017-09-04 17:37:55.000000 UTC
7989348520.30122125Writing it took ten years off my life, so a Pulitzer would be a nice acknowledgement! I'm always happy to help look for sources, so give me a shout if you need that, and if I come across any more for sexism in medicine, I'll leave them in FR or on talk. SarahSV (talk)
322
2017-09-04 14:18:33.000000 UTC
7989070200.30121887"Goofy's (unnamed) wife has appeared—but always with her face unseen—in 1950s-produced cartoon shorts depicting the character as a "family man". Goofy's wife dies later on and Goofy states to his son Max in "Goof Troop," "She's up there with the stars" so his modern day appearances portray Goofy as a widower.Goofy's wife dies later on and Goofy states to his son Max in "Goof Troop," "She's up there with the stars" so his modern day appearances portray Goofy as a widower." This is simply not true. I just finished binge-watching the entire Goof Troop cartoon, including the Christmas special, and the subject of Goofy's wife/Max's mother is never once mentioned in any episode of Goof Troop, meaning the "She's up there with the stars" line is never spoken by Goofy or anyone in that show. Goofy is presented in that show simply as a single father without any explanation or implication as to the fate or whereabouts of Max's biological mother. Please correct this misformation to say something like "Goofy's (unnamed) wife has appeared - but always with her face unseen - in 1950's-produced cartoon shorts depicting the character as a "family man", but his modern appearances portray Goofy as a single father." 75.115.40.71 (talk)
323
2017-09-04 22:04:42.000000 UTC
7989721720.3012153World's Lamest Critic|World, I am not "insistent about keeping these images". I have already clearly stated that the second image is redundant and should be removed. And I'm not insistent on keeping the first image either. I have suggesting modifying it to remove the webpage on the placard that you object to, and I no objection to replacing the image with a good alternative, but we have not found one yet. Your first suggestion that we replace it with a generic picture of any topless woman loses the Topfree protest aspect of the existing image, and your second suggested image doe s not show a topless woman and is not identifiably a protest about the right for women to be Topfree. Only a photo of a topless woman identifiably protesting for the right to be topless would be a suitable replacement for the existing image. The claim that an only partially visible piece of jewelery should disqualify this image seems a major stretch. Meters (talk)
324
2017-09-04 21:08:55.000000 UTC
7989649770.3011766Only you can answer that question, . Are you deliberately trying to get blocked or banned? Cordless Larry (talk)
325
2017-09-04 23:00:30.000000 UTC
7989786280.30115408Page namePer the discussion at Talk:Death of Victoria Martens, where the victim was obviously killed by someone else but no one has been convicted, I think this page should be renamed Death of Faith Hedgepeth.
326
2017-09-04 12:45:42.000000 UTC
7988962080.30111846This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alansohn (talk)
327
2017-09-04 13:19:54.000000 UTC
7989001320.30111846This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Snowflake91 (talk)
328
2017-09-04 15:08:30.000000 UTC
7989137710.30101258allegations Rarely belong in a BLP, and the '''misuse of Wikipedia's voice to present them''' is beyond the pale. If they are important, they must be presented per, and not use Wikipedia's voice for the allegations made. Wikipedia is not a tabloid celebrity gossip site. Collect (talk)
329
2017-09-04 17:23:04.000000 UTC
7989329310.30100214You obviously didn't even bother to perform a cursory check of the validity of your search. Google results for "Gando China" are mostly false hits for the unrelated Gando in Qinghai Province (see Geographic.org, the first result that comes up), as well as non-notable people and companies named Gando. That's why I limit my search term to "Manchuria" (filters out Qinghai, Tibet, etc.) and use Google books (filters out most non-notable garbage on the web). -Zanhe (talk)
330
2017-09-04 02:26:53.000000 UTC
7988314960.30099374did you leave? You are missed!Kintetsubuffalo (talk)
331
2017-09-04 11:46:42.000000 UTC
7988900340.30097684Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, you may be blocked from editing. Jevansen (talk) 11:15, (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie & the Chocolate Factory with . Jim1138 (talk) 11:30,(UTC)
332
2017-09-04 08:44:27.000000 UTC
7988711130.3009756So you accept the systemic bias. The Rambling Man (talk)
333
2017-09-04 17:21:52.000000 UTC
7989327540.30096385User1 = Bcschneider53 U1-EH = yes U1-declared = noUser2 = CollegeCommGC U2-EH = no U2-declared = yes
334
2017-09-04 23:33:43.000000 UTC
7989820310.30093992I know. I've added the account to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Escapement. PeterMan844, by posting that link you've basically confirmed that you are banned User:Grace Saunders. No one deserves to be harassed, not even banned sockpuppeteers, and I feel very sorry for what's happened to you. But hopefully you understand this puts me in an awkward position. Sro23 (talk)
335
2017-09-04 19:25:13.000000 UTC
7989506190.30091214If the sources says "oligarch" and you disagree then you take it to the talk page you don't just delete the sources. Dammitkevin (talk)
336
2017-09-04 14:33:54.000000 UTC
7989090000.30087134It isn't applicable because the policy you link to says nothing about making sources notable. I am not the only one to remove your edits because they are written in a promotional way - you keep linking to the facebook page in multiple places in each edit. I don't care about your petty insults I care about policy and keeping articles clean of fluff. Dammitkevin (talk)
337
2017-09-04 09:29:59.000000 UTC
7988750000.30085Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. –72 (talk)
338
2017-09-04 15:17:29.000000 UTC
7989152030.3007253Snarky or not, in this instance SPECIFICO is right - TTAAC is trying to push their own interpretation of events which don't quite match up with the sources. Sessions wanted Comey fired because he was pissed Comey didn't persecute Clinton. At some point Rosenstein and Sessions had a talk about firing Comey. Then Rosenstein wrote a memo which claimed that Comey should be fired because Comey was too unfair to Clinton. ... You can't square this circle Times. You can put in stuff up about "restore the credibility of the FBI, respect the established authority of the Department of Justice, limit public statements and eliminate leaks" but all of that is basically like when a politician resigns for "health reasons" or "to focus on their personal life". It doesn't mean anything. Whenever somebody gets fired anywhere the person doing the firing says stuff like that. It's boiler plate. It has nothing to do with the actual reasons for the dismissals - and that's what sources say. Volunteer Marek 
339
2017-09-04 17:05:53.000000 UTC
7989304370.30071262What is this, a lecture and or civilised conversation?? Now it is becoming annoying with this nonsesne which you now find "unacceptable". Mistakes happen all the time from other users. This is BECAUSE there could be one or more articles that have the same name. I check them up beforehand. I have done this to avoid confusions. Now, this is the end of this conversation. NikeCage68 (talk)
340
2017-09-04 12:25:55.000000 UTC
7988939470.3007093"If we just used official names, in this case Londonderry, it would allow us to keep wikipedia above any political arguments" - ah, the irony... BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!
341
2017-09-04 02:03:08.000000 UTC
7988288320.30066535Bill Shatner, aka Captain Kirk Too funny... the host of the conference mentions Wikipedia... Atsme📞📧
342
2017-09-04 01:46:38.000000 UTC
7988271200.3006486You and TDLWH You and seem to be in a dispute. Why don't you both calm down, stop throwing the insults or whatever their called (I honestly don't know) and talk about this maturely. This is turning into an edit war and if it continues you both might get blocked and I'd rather not see that happen as we are already short on good, active editors. ♠Dinah♠ 🎤
343
2017-09-04 23:22:50.000000 UTC
7989808570.29916403Male witch The references to male witches should be changed to warlock. I realise that some people believe warlocks are not the same as witches, but that is not the traditional correct usage.203.80.61.102 (talk)
344
2017-09-04 03:07:40.000000 UTC
7988360020.29910573You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Grinch Grinches the Cat in the Hat. SummerPhDv2.0 :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
345
2017-09-04 19:18:28.000000 UTC
7989495950.2981432REDIRECT Talk:Russian Jews in Israel
346
2017-09-04 15:12:25.000000 UTC
7989144000.2964006Read . Final warning: stay off of my talk page. Sundayclose (talk)
347
2017-09-04 08:02:55.000000 UTC
7988668310.2905111The brand of doll would seem to be irrelevant. Though I get the sense that your comments are 'probably' in jest.Jeffro77 (talk)
348
2017-09-04 14:38:58.000000 UTC
7989096920.2893901Wikipedia:Administrators Being an administrator is not easy. And your English writing skill is very weak. Your edits should improve the article so that it won't require Copy editing. Marvellous Spider-Man
349
2017-09-04 06:55:17.000000 UTC
7988608680.28908852Probably little extreme perhaps a section on his anti Britishness will suffice.
350
2017-09-04 21:04:55.000000 UTC
7989644720.28816608Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vice President of the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk)
351
2017-09-04 03:25:49.000000 UTC
7988376810.28768075Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kwon, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
352
2017-09-04 20:23:16.000000 UTC
7989589840.28691193Vige A. Lant (talk)
353
2017-09-04 13:02:30.000000 UTC
7988981360.2858374i am saying again, i have no Sockpuppet and i don't know what i going on really, i am tired, i am tired of this policies that invade privacy of users and don't respect user's contributions. i am 7 years here, i know enough about polices, i am just started making new articles in EnWiki. actually, i am a FaWikiquote user. ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk)
354
2017-09-04 15:30:49.000000 UTC
7989174230.28503612Hi, Serge. It's this person again - "Justinzimmer1398". He's back and adding more hoaxes about fake albums and songs. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justinzimmer868.**And this IP "2604:6000:e840:f100:cca3:e6d9:d392:7c96" that's added the Electric Paradise (hoax album) in a song article, may also be the same person because the IP added it first before Justin. — Zawl
355
2017-09-04 18:19:35.000000 UTC
7989413170.2846979Not having read through this entire thread, but only the opening question, I have to ask. Who the hell thinks Josephus is an RS?! Seriously? No. We're not going to ascribe reliability to a "historian" who lived thousands of years before the historical method or basic methodological naturalism were first described. This is akin to relying on creationist "historians." We cannot classify an author as a reliable source if said author ''doesn't even have'' an identifiable method of truth-seeking, let alone one which is accepted as useful and accurate by experts. Josephus is notable, sure. Josephus' views are due, sure. But Josephus is not, by any measure, a reliable source and we cannot state his claims in wikivoice. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.
356
2017-09-04 21:52:33.000000 UTC
7989707750.2841254You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of HTTP status codes. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
357
2017-09-04 19:37:43.000000 UTC
7989526330.2832823Wikipedia's supposed to serious, not canonized story-tales, which I do enjoy because I follow this faffing nonsense... Inventory is a game mechanic of a multi-media webcomic/video-game inspire shindig.. Magazine, equals must be true? Do you believe everything in print.. although I dig your user page and agree with a lot of your viewpoints. Ryan North must be a sentient human being and not a bot. Somebody made Dinosaur comics.. These things would happen to Calvin & Hobbes. Whatever happened to.. uh.. you know getting things offline? 'Cause unless you get a screenshot of a book... Anything can and will be printed. Amazon releases lots of books of credulous sources and books have been around since the dawn of man 66.79.241.58 (talk)
358
2017-09-04 18:14:36.000000 UTC
7989405510.2822569Terror guideline Hello, at this AfD you discussed a hypothetical policy for terror-related articles; in principle, I agreed with what you had to say. Could we work out an actual policy on such incidents or an additional line to an already-existing guideline? Unfortunately, we need something more clear-cut than something even staunch news inclusionists cannot ignore or misconstrue.TheGracefulSlick (talk)
359
2017-09-04 15:11:48.000000 UTC
7989143020.2815772Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bangladesh–Israel relations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I dream of horses  @
360
2017-09-04 15:36:19.000000 UTC
7989182140.28151232Velipaadinte pusthakam Velipaadinte pusthakam first day gross is incorrect on page. Official gross was around 3.70crores. Please reedit it. Kutturulezz (talk)
361
2017-09-04 14:48:46.000000 UTC
7989110620.2810507So there was a Honda for sale with advertised Curse Control, looks like Wikipedia needs a resident mage to practice as well. L3X1 (distænt write)
362
2017-09-04 16:12:41.000000 UTC
7989231940.2807706This is not vandalizing, I am a historian with multiple degrees. I am neither Greek, nor Macedonian, but American (of French origins), and I don't appreciate Wikipedia not being factual.Saying that the Macedonians were Greek people, is a historical lie. There are many proofs that the Greeks considered Macedon and the Macedonians as "barbarians", which literally was used to categorize "non-Greek" peoples. Later, this was used by the Romans to categorize "non-Roman" people. How could the Macedonians be Greeks, if they were barbarians. Furthermore, to say that the Macedonians of the Republic of Macedonia today have nothing to do with the Macedonians of Ancient Macedon, is also unfactual. Sure, there were slavic invasions, but those people are still attached to that land and part descendants of the ancient Macedon. Thessaloniki and Southern Macedonia, was only conquered by Greece 104 years ago, but used to be part of a much bigger Macedonia that had been conquered by the Ottomans and become Turkish-occupied lands since the 14th century. Before that, it had been conquered by the Bulgarians, before the Bulgarians: the Byzantines, before the Byzantines: the Romans. It had been its own Kingdom but very coveted by all around it. That doesn't make it a Greek-people or population, just because the Greeks want the land now and are still occupying a huge chunk of it (after committing ethnic cleansing on the Macedonians who they considered non-Greeks, may I add).Research your history, stay unbiased and factual, and maybe I won't have to waste my time editing your shameful mistakes. You welcome, by the way!
363
2017-09-04 09:46:41.000000 UTC
7988767880.28068745Hopefully this helps! Wasechun tashunkaHOWLTRACK
364
2017-09-04 05:06:13.000000 UTC
7988481140.28054997''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Death Valley, you may be blocked from editing. Dawnseeker2000
365
2017-09-04 11:16:33.000000 UTC
7988868080.27963185Not a fan of the GA concept, sets it in aspic and brings in a lot of editors who have no interest or Wikipedia:Competence is required competence in the subject matter and who in their complacent ignorance delete most of the important bits leaving it as a superficial shell, usually riddled with basic errors that I can't then be bothered to go back and correct. Rant over. Of course I'm not referring to you, anyone with a clever Latin username wins my instant respect!(Lobsterthermidor (talk) )
366
2017-09-04 23:33:10.000000 UTC
7989819600.2781035I've emailed you the link; incidentally, ANI is best thought of as Z'ha'dum and best avoided by humans. NE Ent
367
2017-09-04 02:05:08.000000 UTC
7988290850.27785978With the present in order to denounce you about the deletion of the Law of the Universe for proved scare about the originality of formulation of the G.U.T. If you United States are not able to accept that other had formulized the Law. I'm sorry.
368
2017-09-04 17:18:12.000000 UTC
7989322560.27765715You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of religions and spiritual traditions. Clean Copytalk
369
2017-09-04 08:50:48.000000 UTC
7988716880.2776025Gundagai has poorly educated people some with some secondary schooling and no tertiary qualifications messing with the local story. Some have no idea of Aboriginal history or other content. They have no idea that by messing up the veracity of Gundagai's story they are vandalising Australian history. They do not like me as I wont give them my research plus they just delete anything to do with the terrible Coolac Massacre as it might mess up their idea that Gundagai is the beginning of Reconciliation in Australia as a tourism attraction to get people to come into the town off the Hume Hwy and spend money at the silly shops in the town. I come at history from a different perspective to that and Cooktown has a far earlier positive relationship between one James Cook and Aboriginal people that happened 80 years before the 1852 Gundagai Flood.
370
2017-09-04 23:00:45.000000 UTC
7989786550.27748802Per the discussion at Talk:Death of Victoria Martens, where the victim was obviously killed by someone else but no one has been convicted, I think this page should be renamed Death of Faith Hedgepeth. Yoninah (talk)
371
2017-09-04 15:15:25.000000 UTC
7989148980.2774249Being reasonable now not really..John Doe was a lie...COmunity went silent after a while and new group called Bloxwatch ain't probally official... XXDeathStarXx (talk)
372
2017-09-04 19:54:22.000000 UTC
7989547920.2770851dear crystallizedcarbon i am sincerley sorry about that i was at a stag party with my drunk friends again sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrumpyPants10 (talk • contribs)
373
2017-09-04 19:05:27.000000 UTC
7989477750.27538574Well how do I get this slander to be removed? I am clearly not alt-right. Do I tweet her with my random twitter account that I use only for viewing (I have 0 tweets on it)?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fierysunset (talk • contribs) :::::Gosh, you don't like being called alt-right? Could it be that to accuse people of belonging to extremist groups, like you did here and here? Ian.thomson (talk)
374
2017-09-04 21:09:32.000000 UTC
7989650470.2747917Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ali Campbell, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk)
375
2017-09-04 05:51:16.000000 UTC
7988527200.2743343Anyway, this page (which was in the process of actively being improved) was recently deleted by User:Orangemike, the reason given being Wikipedia:Patent nonsense (i.e. incoherent text or gibberish). I would disagree (and argue the deletion as being too hastily carried out), and state that a speedy deletion was given in spite of evidence that the article was (based on the edit history) in a clear process of being rapidly copyedited and improved by myself. As context, the Patent Nonsense page states that:
376
2017-09-04 22:05:51.000000 UTC
7989723110.27395537World's Lamest Critic, I am not "insistent about keeping these images". I have already clearly stated that the second image is redundant and should be removed. And I'm not insistent on keeping the first image either. I have suggesting modifying it to remove the webpage on the placard that you object to, and I no objection to replacing the image with a good alternative, but we have not found one yet. Your first suggestion that we replace it with a generic picture of any topless woman loses the Topfree protest aspect of the existing image, and your second suggested image doe s not show a topless woman and is not identifiably a protest about the right for women to be Topfree. Only a photo of a topless woman identifiably protesting for the right to be topless would be a suitable replacement for the existing image. The claim that an only partially visible piece of jewelery should disqualify this image seems a major stretch. Meters (talk)
377
2017-09-04 08:38:55.000000 UTC
7988706140.27240098This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kathi Darbar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have just returned from a block for deletions such as these - your next block will be longer - Please stop - Arjayay (talk)
378
2017-09-04 13:44:06.000000 UTC
7989028870.27219835Copyright of whom?! I was quoting the translation from the sources included from the book of Exodus at the beginning ! Show me where I have violated the copyrights ! Bigot 27 (talk)
379
2017-09-04 00:09:51.000000 UTC
7988151270.272189WikiProjects relating to the United States Defying orders to the contrary, I wanted to help answer some of your questions about adding additional states to Template:WikiProject United States. When I was still actively editing my attempt was to try to do just that, to include all the inactive and defunct projects and any other US related ones that wanted to into a central banner similar to Military history and Biography, not to Mention Africa, Asia and a number of others. Hyperbole of a corporate takeover aside, my intention was to use the WPUS project as a central base from which to monitor and maintain articles on the other related projects. Working from a central location allows better visibility and the ability to ask questions of a larger community; standardize and eliminate redundancy. Some did not agree and sought to destroy me and eventually succeeded after years of fighting them and standing up against bullies for the editors on this site like you who are actively improving it. Those projects like Oregon, Florida, Alabama and others all decided they didn't want to participate. In most cases it was one or 2 people ONLY and most of them are now inactive as you noticed. So I say that to explain some of the history but my advice to you is let the Wikiprojects relating to the United States die, especially the WPUS one. They are plutonium and anyone who actively tries to improve them will be attacked and bullied by other related projects like USRoads and Wisconsin (they share a lot of the same members). My further advice to you is to find something better to do, don't waste your time editing like I did only to have the community and the WMF spit in your face. I did over 1 million edits, created hundreds of articles, etc and now I am globally WMF banned because I refused to be bullied. Take my advice friend, get out while you still have some sanity, this place isn't worth your time. Cheers! Kumioko. Clarityindarkness (talk)
380
2017-09-04 17:25:05.000000 UTC
7989331810.2711978You obviously didn't even bother to perform a cursory check of the validity of your search. Google results for "Gando China" are mostly false hits for the unrelated Gando in Qinghai Province (see Geographic.org, the first result that comes up), as well as non-notable people and companies named Gando. Some are even about Chinese activities in Gando, Burkina Faso. That's why I limit my search term to "Manchuria" (filters out Qinghai, Tibet, Burkina Faso, etc.) and use Google books (filters out most non-notable garbage on the web). -Zanhe (talk)
381
2017-09-04 15:36:36.000000 UTC
7989182590.2709647Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at NBC, you may be blocked from editing. oknazevad (talk)
382
2017-09-04 16:40:44.000000 UTC
7989271430.26863733Disingenuous Disingenuous: not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.I still don't understand why the Syrian conflict needs a separate article that is updated daily. WP is not a newspaper. Rhadow (talk)
383
2017-09-04 20:52:26.000000 UTC
7989628060.26844543I can't repeat myself a fifth time, so if you (or the particularly revert-prone contributor I pinged twice about this who, even after several major edits to this same article since, seemingly refuses to respond) still 'can't see the problem', it's better to invite outside opinions on this. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓
384
2017-09-04 05:30:28.000000 UTC
7988507450.26821998You do not block people like that. Although I am not supposed to have personal attacks, that does not mean that you should just block me without a warning. According to Wikipedia, you were supposed do a block properly by giving that person a warning before blocking them. Be careful of your actions next time.Thechinesekid (talk)
385
2017-09-04 14:05:51.000000 UTC
7989055350.26794466September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk)
386
2017-09-04 07:59:00.000000 UTC
7988664470.2676611External links modified Hello fellow Wikipedians,I have just modified one external link on Big Fat Liar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170211075230/http://www.kusi.com/story/34454732/from-universal-pictures-home-entertainment-ricky-garcia-and-barry-bostwick-go-head-to-head-in-the-all-new-side-splitting-comedy-bigger-fatter-liar to http://www.kusi.com/story/34454732/from-universal-pictures-home-entertainment-ricky-garcia-and-barry-bostwick-go-head-to-head-in-the-all-new-side-splitting-comedy-bigger-fatter-liarWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug)
387
2017-09-04 09:36:01.000000 UTC
7988755770.26671827Never mind. It's him.PeterMan844 (talk)
388
2017-09-04 15:13:33.000000 UTC
7989145950.2657379Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nemanja Matić, you may be blocked from editing. Kosack (talk)
389
2017-09-04 21:17:33.000000 UTC
7989661820.26541024This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2017 in Philippine television, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LG-Gunther :  Talk 
390
2017-09-04 21:56:04.000000 UTC
7989711600.2652506A kitten for you! For a second there I thought your username was ScaryGrandma.Whispering
391
2017-09-04 20:18:57.000000 UTC
7989583520.26452702And I was just circling back to look at Marshall and I see you have done a bang up job of expanding her! Woo Hoo! SusunW (talk)
392
2017-09-04 15:36:01.000000 UTC
7989181640.26426682Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Juan Williams, you may be blocked from editing. Dammitkevin (talk)
393
2017-09-04 05:22:38.000000 UTC
7988499760.26308748I'm not accusing Pykhalov of anything personally for your information, but others have made very serious accusations against him I forgot to mention the accusation of ethnic bigotry and the one of inciting ethnic hatred, on top of the source falsification. It's not our job to decide whether he source falsified but rather to report that others make the accusation. We don't care on this page what Russian society thinks about Ukraine. Interesting use of jargon like "POV language", very odd for a "new" user, or perhaps you've returned? But of course, what sounds like a duck quacking could be a recording of a duck quack or maybe a very ill Canadian goose, who knows :/. :::Also, interesting claim you make that the sources "don't mention Pykhalov". Oh, really? It is incredibly easy to disprove this claim of yours. All I have to do is type his name in Cyrillic into the search bar and voila, his name shows up everywhere :). This one is actually about him https://shalamov.ru/research/25/. This one mentions him http://kk.convdocs.org/docs/index-136226.html, as does this one http://www.grozny-inform.ru/main.mhtml?Part=11&PubID=6210, http://www.nakanune.ru/news/2014/9/1/22367034/, and this one []. And that, my friend, is all the linked sources that were used all five of them. Nice try mate. Yalens (talk)
394
2017-09-04 13:04:46.000000 UTC
7988983700.26208737Oh, and Duggan's article does assert she scored two hat-tricks, but Wiliams has scored precisely zero. The Rambling Man (talk)
395
2017-09-04 08:22:40.000000 UTC
7988693200.2620863Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Canada Day, you may be blocked from editing. Instantmatter49 (talk)
396
2017-09-04 08:24:39.000000 UTC
7988694860.2604899I'm not givin' excuses for u, u asked why and I answered u .And about ferret and sergiecross , I was new in Wikipedia , and i losed my temper when they reverted my edits , OK Little KID ?
397
2017-09-04 22:08:03.000000 UTC
7989725720.25993082Jocques Clemmons The section on him is simply poorly written. It seems as if someone is trying to justify the shooting. He was a felon and that is why he couldn't have a gun. The source mentions his probation status as the speculated justification for him running. As he was a felon it was a crime for him to have that gun (a class c felony) which would have been a violation of his probation.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk)
398
2017-09-04 21:35:17.000000 UTC
7989685580.25929797Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Penicillium, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk)
399
2017-09-04 21:34:20.000000 UTC
7989684270.25918365Do you find it odd having split conversations? -Roxy the dog. bark
400
2017-09-04 10:57:10.000000 UTC
7988845470.257878I accept your apology, my intention was not to portray you negative at the wikiproject but to ask others about this. You were the one who made fun of my name and called me little kid, from that point I became angry. And let's see what Ferret and others concludes about this matter. Pure conSouls (talk)
401
2017-09-04 10:38:00.000000 UTC
7988823980.25741842No worries, I'll do what I can. Chiswick Chap (talk)
402
2017-09-04 20:46:48.000000 UTC
7989621210.25722608Request for User:World's Lamest Critic: Book written by a woman I would love to be to be able to create a new article, Walking Out on the Boys, but unfortunately I have been ed from editing wikipedia. Just wondering if you would be interested in creating this article:*It would be a good challenge for you: Have you created any s yet?*It is a (Frances K. Conley) and is "the story of her protest of misogyny" at the University hospital (according to the article).*It is controversialAre you up to the challenge? Ottawahitech (talk)
403
2017-09-04 20:21:44.000000 UTC
7989587660.25680104Oppose both current options - While I wouldn't mind including mention of criticism in the lead, the 2 current options are kind of silly. "Mansplaining" is quite obviously pejorative, gender-biased, and sexist. The criticism of the term is mostly about it being gender essentialist and over-used. Are there any other options? Kaldari (talk)
404
2017-09-04 10:19:25.000000 UTC
7988802810.25643978This article should be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (It's linked for terrorism) Sourcecontent1 (talk)
405
2017-09-04 05:30:20.000000 UTC
7988507300.25600663Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Swapnote, you may be blocked from editing. Instantmatter49 (talk)
406
2017-09-04 21:48:05.000000 UTC
7989702550.25571617Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fruit preserves, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf(talk)
407
2017-09-04 13:44:37.000000 UTC
7989029510.25570583Copyright of whom?! I was quoting the translation from the sources included in the book of Exodus at the beginning ! Show me where I have violated the copyrights ! Bigot 27 (talk)
408
2017-09-04 14:00:02.000000 UTC
7989048660.25536397Your userpage You asked how you might improve your userpage - since you've clearly identified yourself as a minor I've removed the personal details. You should never put such personal information on your userpage, at least not until you're old enough to understand the risks of doing so. That applies everywhere on the Internet. Please leave personally-identifying information off your userpage.You haven't been bullied - you have walked into a community where maturity and professionalism are basic expectations. Once you realize that it will be much easier. You were blocked because you were harming the encyclopedia by attempting to claim that people who were patiently helping you were "enemies." That kind of perception is a symptom of immaturity, and your failure to understand that it's not acceptable is a clear sign that you might not be ready to do useful work here. You're clearly smart and willing to try things, but I strongly advise you to take it slowly and not to make assumptions that someone who criticizes your actions is an enemy. Acroterion (talk)
409
2017-09-04 02:13:35.000000 UTC
7988299430.25488132Edit War Editor Kitchen Knife has developed an attitude and deliberately provoked an edit war. He will not cooperate on advancing the article and continually insults. Will someone tell me how this editor can be stopped? I will NOT be bullied. Thank you. 90.213.130.132 (talk)
410
2017-09-04 02:48:27.000000 UTC
7988340710.2539279Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stephenville, Newfoundland and Labrador, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
411
2017-09-04 00:46:53.000000 UTC
7988192080.2537987208.54.80.175 Please revoke talk page access? Adding porn to page. Thanks Jim1138 (talk)
412
2017-09-04 21:43:12.000000 UTC
7989696640.2533515September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lolville, California. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
413
2017-09-04 07:03:27.000000 UTC
7988615700.25272322Sorry but the dictionary definition of fascism doesnt specify left or rightwing. And based on every definition of the word, fascism can clearly be used by anyone on any part of the political spectrum. To declare that its right-wing only is entirely politically motivated. 69.165.154.15 (talk)
414
2017-09-04 07:36:42.000000 UTC
7988643780.25191072Re: List of thwarted Islamist terrorist attacks Hi Coriantumr15, Your edit to this page here left a lot to be desired. ie: :"... this plotted as stopped only at the airport checkin counter when a traveler attempted to checkin a bag that was suspiciously too heavy." See here, where I 'fixed' it. It now reads::"... the plot was stopped at the airport luggage check-in counter when a traveller attempted to check a bag that was too heavy."Your earlier edit here was also flawed, for example "... city of Sidney" not Sydney. I have also altered that in my 'fix' edit above.* Please be more careful in future, double check you grammar, and please provide more source information then just the sources name, like date published, author/s if any and access date. 220 of Borg
415
2017-09-04 15:51:50.000000 UTC
7989204110.2513322Current I just removed the notice that said "Virtuality redirects here" which was FALSE because Virtuality has its own page. PiPhD (talk) I'm culling the See Also list. It's grown ridiculous. There's no need for a general topic like VR to link to a small subset of the commercial products used for it. [[U
416
2017-09-04 18:36:56.000000 UTC
7989438860.25100604Yes, I agree; while I think the default should be "infobox unless there's a reason not to have one" it doesn't mean I don't think there are many situations where there is a good reason not to have one (generally "there are so few facts that any infobox would be meaningless", "the lead image needs to be displayed at a large width" or "the topic can't be summarised without accompanying explanation"). However, the "every page needs an infobox" faction certainly do exist.::::::::::::::::::::(On a completely unrelated topic, do you want to try explaining to this person in German that their grasp of the English language isn't as good as they think it is, and there's only a limited amount of patience The Wikipedia Community will show when it comes to comments like "your pertinent professional incompetence", especially given that their recent edit history seems to consist almost exclusively of machine-translated gibberish.) ‑ Iridescent
417
2017-09-04 19:38:56.000000 UTC
7989528100.25031736Wikipedia's supposed to serious, not canonized story-tales, which I do enjoy because I follow this faffing nonsense... Inventory is a game mechanic of a multi-media webcomic/video-game inspire shindig.. Magazine, equals must be true? Do you believe everything in print.. although I dig your user page and agree with a lot of your viewpoints. Ryan North must be a sentient human being and not a bot. Somebody made Dinosaur comics.. These things would happen to Calvin & Hobbes. Whatever happened to.. uh.. you know getting things offline? 'Cause unless you get a screenshot of a book... Anything can and will be printed. Amazon releases lots of books of reliable and unreliable.. sources and books have been around since the dawn of man. 66.79.241.58 (talk)
418
2017-09-04 13:27:53.000000 UTC
7989009900.24994218You know I think it's best to put a stop to this. Add back your entire folk section and please leave other sections alone. How many times can you be replacing these images honestly, Oliszydlowski
419
2017-09-04 01:26:16.000000 UTC
7988242020.24991946Dear Editor,Can we get the valour stories (?) at least a one valour story of this Gentleman as he keeps criticizing peope from armed forces day in and day out.We would certainly like to know credentials. Merely joining and quitting armed forces does not give one birthright to castigate them. P H Bhanage
420
2017-09-04 02:42:07.000000 UTC
7988332360.24929416=G.U.T.With the present in order to denounce you about the deletion of the Law of the Universe for proved scare about the originality of formulation of the G.U.T. If you United States are not able to accept that other had formulized the Law. I'm sorry.Now listen to me. I had 9 legal causes in my life and do you know how many I've lost? 0. — Prenote • (talk) (UTC+1)
421
2017-09-04 23:44:45.000000 UTC
7989832830.2491222Eh? Revisionism? Not at all. But just about everything you have stated is not conducive to this merge proposal discussion. Do stay on-topic. AfD discussion does not belong here. We can go ahead and collapse this bit (my "discussion" with you). Flyer22 Reborn (talk)
422
2017-09-04 21:48:14.000000 UTC
7989702790.24880487Breed's origin There is nothing in the article telling e reader that this breed has any connection to Germany. Does it? Or is it simply an offshoot of the Newfoundland? Cavalryman V31 (talk)
423
2017-09-04 00:29:19.000000 UTC
7988171900.2486967Yeah, I was not quite correct about the Nutley Velodrome being a motorcycle track. It was a midget car track. And it was recognized as being the most dangerous midget car track ever. That was where the accident happened that literally cost someone their head. Scroll down for details.Definite notability. Daniel Case (talk)
424
2017-09-04 00:36:02.000000 UTC
7988179730.2476795This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Northern England, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk)
425
2017-09-04 19:31:27.000000 UTC
7989515590.2472298You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Spencer-Churchill, 11th Duke of Marlborough. Dammitkevin (talk)
426
2017-09-04 12:55:03.000000 UTC
7988973020.2471615September 2017 You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Henrichardchopra. Thank you. — fortunavelut luna
427
2017-09-04 17:26:34.000000 UTC
7989333580.24708812, pinging just to sooth your assumption I would claim something I myself considered dishonest, and to let you know that I am not interested in hiding. I also do not want to blow up that miserable fight at WP:AN, so I try to answer here. However, I consider your formulation as distinctively offensive, both here and there, and I will try to explain, why I plead innocent.:Explicitely, I do refer to that edit by Hasteur on 17.08.2017, which I consider, without any special WP background, in the meaning known to me, as canvassing for an arbiter - nothing to critisize about. Furthermore, I do consider the wording "Taku-cruft" as remarkably offensive, and, since the whole posting contains no mentioning of Hasteur's own involvement, I consider it, imho rightfully, as intentionally biassing. In no way I claimed that Hasteur were successful in his indisputeable efforts to bias Stifle. Finally, I assume that stubbornness is not an insult, but just a word for an unpleasant behaviour.:In my perception I gave a correct report on the facts, and so I deny having put forth any accusation of misconduct, and having spewed insults. I do perceive massive threatening from your side via blocking, and especially by "strongly suggest you don't attempt it", leaving it and any consequences of it in the open. Purgy (talk)
428
2017-09-04 19:43:04.000000 UTC
7989533410.24697791Allow me to nail your first argument first. You said, "Better sources like one from Britain University of Hull said there are 27 million people living in slave-like conditions, while State Departments said 20.9 million (2014)." Do you agree that you were talking nonsense when you mentioned Hull because the Global Slavery Index is compiled at Hull? What is the State Department Website? Please enlighten? One argument at a time. I won't let you slip away that easy. So, let's have the state department slavery website. Fowler&fowler«Talk»
429
2017-09-04 00:11:49.000000 UTC
7988153200.24676721Question about cast Who is playing the fun girl with the bath robe, trying to seduce the cob? PotatoEater (talk)
430
2017-09-04 04:50:10.000000 UTC
7988464800.24625364Naming change discussion at WP:MilHist [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#"Nazi Germany" as name of combatant in WWII articles]] Andy Dingley (talk)
431
2017-09-04 20:20:56.000000 UTC
7989586480.2459927Oppose both current options - While I wouldn't mind including mention of criticism in the lead, the 2 options are kind of silly. "Mansplaining" is quite obviously pejorative, gender-biased, and sexist. The criticism of the term is mostly about it being gender essentialist and over-used. Are there any other options? Kaldari (talk)
432
2017-09-04 22:24:22.000000 UTC
7989746470.24591811Why are you so extra LMAO ARMYs are the best seriously 😂 Deb.namrata (talk)
433
2017-09-04 05:36:18.000000 UTC
7988513310.2458835I'm not accusing Pykhalov of anything personally for your information, but others have made very serious accusations against him I forgot to mention the accusation of ethnic bigotry and the one of inciting ethnic hatred, on top of the source falsification. It's not our job to decide whether he source falsified but rather to report that others make the accusation. We don't care on this page what Russian society thinks about Ukraine. As for Russian military sources awesome, I'm sure you can tell how an actual party to the conflict could not be considered a neutral source by any means and should not be presented as such. Interesting use of jargon like "POV language", very odd for a "new" user, or perhaps you've returned? But of course, what sounds like a duck quacking could be a recording of a duck quack or maybe a very ill Canadian goose, who knows :/.
434
2017-09-04 13:10:02.000000 UTC
7988989690.24569969Dear Buckshot06! I am very grateful for the offer. I read both articles (Russian and English). They are both obsolete. Judging by the current situation, the archives are constantly digitized. Unfortunately, the information is laid out to certain dates (usually on the Victory Day). We will add here the normative legal acts of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, which continue to restrict access to archives. I do not want to write about what I know only on the Internet. At the same time, if I have access to any information, I will try to improve both articles. In three years I will improve something! (Чёрт побери!!!!). Your friend Георгий Палкин (talk)
435
2017-09-04 16:52:21.000000 UTC
7989286730.2453265Where did all that happen? Some people had some reservations, I answered the questions and they became quiet as all sensible people should. Me being right, does it make me any the better than them? Of course not! There were climatologists, there were people who had doctorate in Mathematics, it was an honor to be interacting with them. There achievements remain as it is and I remained a nobody in front of them. However, you are jumping like a ball. We all are wrong sometimes. A person who gets irritated on being found wrong becomes crazy. They start hurting themselves or people around them. I am not saying your situation is as aggravated, but it might. They start seeing things which do not exist such as they start thinking that everyone else is saying what they are saying. They start trying to act bigger than they are, such as you trying to act like an admin and being admonished for that. I got blocked for the right reasons. I did not know the Wikipedia policy about not doing three reverts. I was wrong then. I am not ashamed of doing genuine mistakes. I learn from them. Did I do any other edit after that? By writing on your talk page, I am trying to arrive at a consensus. So now let me know what are your reservations about the additions, because you are the person who seem to be having reservations? Wilkn (talk)
436
2017-09-04 09:19:25.000000 UTC
7988740390.24490924Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blum Blum Shub, you may be blocked from editing. Instantmatter49 (talk)
437
2017-09-04 04:27:38.000000 UTC
7988440750.24455857Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
438
2017-09-04 17:19:15.000000 UTC
7989323890.24449658Furthermore, your continued referencing of the fact that those who are "insulting" Pykhalov happen to be Chechen, as if their ethnicity fundamentally biases them (this is the most favorable reading of what you are saying, there are other much less favorable interpretations too), is discriminatory and disgusting. Please cut it out. I would never even think of saying the same of ethnic Russians. Your off-topic railing about so-called Chechen "traditions" is also disturbing. As for sources on what happens, yes I myself prefer to ignore both Russian and Chechen (notice I have not cited Akhmadov once or even used his book for this) sources but instead on the less involved sources of foreign countries, such as Moshe Gammer (Israeli), Derluguian (Armenian), John Dunlop and so on. Yes they exist. And Russian sources are often useful but when they are criticized extensively, accused of falsification, and happen to be from people involved in the Russian military (but see also press freedom in Russia) we cannot simply portray their point of view as the indisputable fact, when there is a dispute about it (indeed, on the alleged draft evasion there is the rival view, found I believe in  Горцы Кавказа в Великой Отечественной войне, that holds that draft numbers were low due to long running anti-Chechen discriminatory policies). Quite frankly, it is not your job to "check" whether Pykhalov falsified, and the accusation of his falsification went beyond just what you're discussing I'm sorry, but that is what NPOV is about. Yalens (talk)
439
2017-09-04 01:34:49.000000 UTC
7988253520.24350062Well, I'm a sarcastic talk stalker too hehe, and will be going to sleep around 10:00 EDTish. :P KGirl (Wanna chat?)
440
2017-09-04 19:23:41.000000 UTC
7989503980.24232689You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk TV (Philippines). KGirl (Wanna chat?)
441
2017-09-04 18:51:23.000000 UTC
7989458580.24197623You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Irma Stern. KGirl (Wanna chat?) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
442
2017-09-04 18:39:00.000000 UTC
7989441870.24139675With respect to your obsession with the technical phrase station blackout and how that is re-directing to the article "power failure", and from there, you inferring some vast conspiracy that this is blaming the power grid...can you perhaps take a second away from smoking reefer and perhaps look at the jumps of sheer conspiratorial fervor you are doing to arrive at this notion?:Thanks. :As the station lost power, it had a power failure end of story. Nothing to do with the power grid. Agreed?
443
2017-09-04 05:32:41.000000 UTC
7988509750.24136469You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Swapnote. Instantmatter49 (talk)
444
2017-09-04 19:35:17.000000 UTC
7989522060.24119337also utterly useless This is NOT an encyclopedia article. It is someone's essay. There has not even been an attempt to provide a source or reference. It has been in this state for almost nine years. It will be flagged for deletion. Weeb Dingle (talk)
445
2017-09-04 04:56:50.000000 UTC
7988471560.2410472September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at NCC, you may be blocked from editing. Wgolf (talk)
446
2017-09-04 16:46:27.000000 UTC
7989279080.2405311Further, you may want to withdraw your threat to further vandalize the article ("If you 'correct'my correction again i'm going to spend all day deleting the entire page"), else you be permanently blocked from editing. General Ization Talk
447
2017-09-04 09:00:31.000000 UTC
7988724900.24047975You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Plains, Montana. Instantmatter49 (talk)
448
2017-09-04 21:33:34.000000 UTC
7989683200.2402916Macon, you absolutely read what I wrote. Someone who makes dramatic exits from a half-dozen pages over the last few years cannot resist the attention. TheValeyard (talk)
449
2017-09-04 16:24:26.000000 UTC
7989249040.23903058An appropriate block. Your very first edits were BLP vandalism. Doug Weller talk
450
2017-09-04 05:41:11.000000 UTC
7988518220.23896402Warning. And I did explain this, I removed the rest because it is the UNDUE theories of Pykhalov, a man who is described as a Stalinist apologist, who is accused of inciting ethnic hatred and of source falsification. As per UNDUE we do not need three paragraphs of stuff derived from his work.Yalens (talk)
451
2017-09-04 13:31:11.000000 UTC
7989013550.23794843Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bad Luck Brian, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk)
452
2017-09-04 22:11:56.000000 UTC
7989729930.23761484Stop messing around. Fake edit summaries are not going to help. We don't giant logos, and we don't need unsourced claims. Meters (talk)
453
2017-09-04 06:43:49.000000 UTC
7988597670.23759729I stand by my description. I have no AGF in an editor who had previously tried to remove the term "criminal" from the article, and is now trying to claim that someone convicted of murder is not a murderer. The editor's edit summaries said nothing about disputing " mass murderer". He or she stated more than once that Manson was simply not a murderer at all. That's POV pushing. One editor added the material and two others restored it after the removal was considered vandalism. If you want to support the removal yourself then do so. If anyone else wants to support the removal I'm happy to consider their opinions too. Otherwise I suggest that we drop this. Meters (talk)
454
2017-09-04 12:18:07.000000 UTC
7988931340.23754409September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lingayatism, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk)
455
2017-09-04 12:55:43.000000 UTC
7988973740.23754409All that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us years ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is more about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah who is seen now as some form of monster. The Palmer House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this incestual nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent? This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind ending in murder. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with a thousand different endings, some good and some evil. I am absolutely convinced that Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved. Incest is a scourge, and as he states in "Catching the Big Fish" he only wishes to help others attempt to heal as well through Transcendental Meditation. He has been indoctrinating all of us.
456
2017-09-04 12:44:12.000000 UTC
7988960320.23754409Some do, such as Oxford, "An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization." But we generally use textbooks rather than dictionaries to define topics. And we certainly don't use fascists who were notorious for dishonesty and inconsistency. Note Mussolini also wrote (in "The Doctrine of Fascism,") "this is the century of authority, a century tending to the 'right', a Fascist century." That's why we rely on experts to interpret and weigh his words. TFD (talk)
457
2017-09-04 13:09:17.000000 UTC
7988988670.23754409One person wanting to remove something is not consensus. If you want to eliminate a column then start a Request for Discussion. 2607:F2C0:958C:DE00:2502:A874:DB17:B0E2 (talk)
458
2017-09-04 13:22:35.000000 UTC
7989004140.23754409What about the orchestra leader, the guy who held the horse, and Mrs. Lincoln's emotional scars? It's stuff like this that makes some people disdain infoboxes. I suggest we remove the Non-fatal injuries altogether. EEng
459
2017-09-04 08:01:21.000000 UTC
7988666600.23754409ANI seems to be a waste of time for a content dispute. Spacecowboy420 (talk)
460
2017-09-04 08:33:42.000000 UTC
7988701950.23754409Final warning Please stop adding your Smurf "information", which isn't correct. I don't know whether they are purely your invention or some form of fan fiction, but it surely doesn't belong on Wikipedia at all. If you continue to add this or similar content, you will be blocked. Fram (talk)
461
2017-09-04 08:58:35.000000 UTC
7988723320.23754409Cat wikilaas.what part of this did you not understand? I am happy to explain any part of it to you .I look forward to hearing from you.Regard,Veritylookingfortruth (talk)
462
2017-09-04 09:20:12.000000 UTC
7988741060.23754409You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blum Blum Shub. Instantmatter49 (talk)
463
2017-09-04 09:44:43.000000 UTC
7988765610.23754409''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bruiser Brody, you may be blocked from editing. Nickag989talk
464
2017-09-04 08:34:13.000000 UTC
7988702330.23754409I think that you are able ONLY to make tags as per your ideas...Now you also wrote that is also "self published" or in coi...are you able to make a real good editing based on what you think is advert or wrong links... or opnly able to make a fake-tag, without reason just to make a digital war?Or we have to think that YOU are in COI or payed to do that?Cavecanem101 (talk)
465
2017-09-04 04:42:41.000000 UTC
7988458100.23754409pronunciation how do you pronounce it? is it ai-den-tih-tee your-oh-pah?Wikigirl97 (talk)
466
2017-09-04 05:30:31.000000 UTC
7988507550.23754409This is not an edit war. This is vandalism and POV pushing. Calling that an edit war, and warning us to discus it rather than edit war (after pinging us no less) seems over the top. One editor has been making edits that are against consensus and, at least in my opinion, vandalism. I templated him for vandalism for one of those edits For the last three weeks or so that editor has been attempting to claim that a convicted murderer cannot be called such. Before that the editor in question even attempted to remove the description of Manson as "a criminal" . It's difficult to see this as good faith editing. I see no problem in calling someone convicted of five murders in one event (mass murder according to Mass murder), and who is called a "mass murderer" in reliable sources (http://www.abc10.com/news/nation/history-of-charles-mansons-crimes/382112919 http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-charles-manson-hospitalized-20170103-story.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/charles-manson-ill-family-murders-cult-leader-sharon-tate-hospital-health-parole-a7508476.html and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/04/convicted-mass-killer-charles-manson-seriously-hospital-outside/ for example) a "criminal" and a "convicted mass murderer". Meters (talk)
467
2017-09-04 04:16:04.000000 UTC
7988430390.23754409Improvements The headers were just ridiculous. I tried a temporary fix at least to make the TOC not look absolutely abysmal. All of these claims in what used to be the "notes" were unsubstantiated and unreferenced themselves. It's also just a hard page to read in general, and very confusing given the varied and excessive qualifiers that separate each header. Definitely need to work on this page. SEMMENDINGER (talk)
468
2017-09-04 05:59:50.000000 UTC
7988537100.23754409I must say, Esen-Baur makes a very poor case for Dietrich. It amounts to little more than I claim it, therefore it's true. I mean, "inverse boustrophedon makes sense only in terms of a celestial notation system" is almost silly beyond belief. So we have someone positing a hypothesis with no confirmatory evidence, and then a reviewer that swallows it who is either completely ignorant of the history of writing, or who only comprehends what he wants to believe. This is not promising.Dietrich has some nicely aesthetic ideas on how the complex glyphs might be composed of simpler elements. It's nice to see the different assumptions involved. — kwami (talk)
469
2017-09-04 04:56:37.000000 UTC
7988471270.23754409The AfD at the top supports Israel, Nato, the rule of law and opposes or uses any kind of violence against political opponents. The AfD leader in Bavaria, Petr Bryston, is born in the Czech Republic and came to Germany as a refugee himself. You also can find many people from eastern Europe living in Germany supporting the AfD and secular Persians doing the same as well. Achille Demagbo, a black person, got elected as a party executive in the most northern state in Germany, Schleswig-Holstein. Also the party manages to achieve massive support within the group of Russian-Germans.
470
2017-09-04 04:35:06.000000 UTC
7988449180.23754409My apology On the brief, unexplained warning! Jim1138 (talk)
471
2017-09-04 21:06:35.000000 UTC
7989646900.23754409I'm not sure I understand you. You're suggesting that we should determine whether to include content based on our reading of social-media posts as to whether the subject of an article was "really bothered" by being stalked? RivertorchFIREWATER
472
2017-09-04 21:31:36.000000 UTC
7989680600.23754409This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dinotrux, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shellwood (talk)
473
2017-09-04 20:34:34.000000 UTC
7989604520.23754409Contested deletion This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Am I trying to get banned for creating such an unreferenced junk article due to ? "Delete and "?) AaronWikia (talk)
474
2017-09-04 21:37:43.000000 UTC
7989689220.23754409You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Penicillium. Simplexity22 (talk)
475
2017-09-04 20:39:56.000000 UTC
7989611730.23754409September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Warning for repeated vandalism. If looked at separately your edits could be seen as merely "unconstructive", but a look at your total contributions shows a pattern of being "deliberately unconstructive", i.e. vandalism.'' - Tom | Thomas.W talk
476
2017-09-04 20:23:35.000000 UTC
7989590200.23754409Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Serendipity, you may be blocked from editing. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email)
477
2017-09-04 06:31:38.000000 UTC
7988584020.23754409Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Boston Latin School, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk)
478
2017-09-04 06:06:05.000000 UTC
7988546230.23754409Warning Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Anonimu (talk)
479
2017-09-04 07:44:58.000000 UTC
7988651180.23754409Seriously, you make me laugh, man! No one is allowed to make a same copy of the game or use its trademark, didn't you know about copyrights. No company will do that otherwise the copyright holder will sue them. And making a video game is not everyone's cup of tea, no single person can make a whole video game in such a short amount of time, it takes very long time and a very big team of experts to make a video game, everyone knows that. 😂 Pure conSouls (talk)
480
2017-09-04 07:07:09.000000 UTC
7988618830.23754409Sorry but the dictionary definition of fascism doesnt specify left or rightwing. And based on every definition of the word, fascism can clearly be used by anyone on any part of the political spectrum. To declare that its right-wing only is entirely politically motivated. 1919 Benito Mussolini described fascism as a movement that would strike "against the backwardness of the right and the destructiveness of the left". 69.165.154.15 (talk)
481
2017-09-04 15:38:56.000000 UTC
7989185810.23754409hobbies?! in an article of an ecyclopedia??? no, defently it has no justification to have a passage about ones hobbies. this is irrelevant and trivial! therefor i have deleted it. intrests of a person can be mentioned, but not like in a dating profile with an extra passage called hobbies. Dasuprmastr (talk)
482
2017-09-04 15:11:20.000000 UTC
7989142110.23754409Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Capitalism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I dream of horses  @
483
2017-09-04 15:07:24.000000 UTC
7989136190.23754409September 2017 This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Snowflake91 (talk)
484
2017-09-04 14:14:20.000000 UTC
7989065180.23754409Peoplea are noticing folk art just look at that article in an English language magazine it's nothing to be ashamed of. E-960 (talk)
485
2017-09-04 14:49:45.000000 UTC
7989111860.23754409overlong, rough at the edges I agree that the article is much too "adulatory" in tone. I have nothing against Elton John or Princess Diana — or, for that matter, Marilyn Monroe. However, I have never particularly liked the song in any of its versions. The original seems to have been less a "tribute" than a meditation on the destructive potential of popular fame, and the sad irony that fame not only often outlives the famous, but their destruction increases that fame. However, the "tribute" gloss is what drew the audience, & EJ pandered to that. It's therefore doubly ironic (at least) that this song was reworked to honor Diana, who died while fleeing from the endless hounding of paparazzi that were feeding into the demands of rabid scandal-sheet consumers. Certainly I am not the only radio listener to have grasped this.I question repeated use of "tribute" because nowhere is the term defined or even an article offered in explanation. Have a look at Tribute (disambiguation). Considering the roots of the original lyrics, the adulatory rewrite, and the often obsessive nature of fans, I could make the case that the porn-related definition of "tribute" is not entirely incorrect here.Shouldn't the article also maybe note that The Candle in the Wind is a T. H. White novel (1958) about King Arthur? Certainly EJ (or at least Taupin) is not unaware of this connection to the fundamental English mythos.In any case, the lede is MUCH too long. It ought to be trimmed back to the first paragraph, maybe the first two. The rest would much better be sorted into appropriate points in the article itself.As for the body, there's far too much fannish arm-waving and trivia, e.g. the reference to Chubby Checker. The piece could benefit by removing such chaff. Weeb Dingle (talk)
486
2017-09-04 15:11:59.000000 UTC
7989143270.23754409You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Michy Batshuayi. Egghead06 (talk)
487
2017-09-04 00:21:01.000000 UTC
7988163030.23754409Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Standoff, you may be blocked from editing. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
488
2017-09-04 00:57:32.000000 UTC
7988203960.23754409You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to WUT. — nihlus kryik  (talk)
489
2017-09-04 00:03:52.000000 UTC
7988143540.23754409DYK for The Jewish Confederates — Maile (talk)
490
2017-09-04 01:57:16.000000 UTC
7988281800.23754409Please let me briefly state a few things here. About 5 years back I came upon this article of my pastor, and it was a slanderous, distorted mess, put up by individuals highly antagonistic to RB Thieme. I worked for a few years against much opposition to get the article where it accurately stated what he was about. Now, several years later, it has come under attack again. The content I removed was only recently added, originating from a concerted press smear campaign against a political candidate the press did not like. The press allegations are false. I have little doubt about the motivation behind including this one paragraph which pays disproportionate attention to these defamatory remarks. At any rate, I've got better things to do with my life these days. If this content is what you like, then have it. Bye.
491
2017-09-04 01:59:58.000000 UTC
7988284350.23754409=G.U.T.=With the present in order to denounce you about the deletion of the Law of the Universe for proved scare about the originality of formulation of the G.U.T.Now listen to me. I had 9 legal causes in my life and do you know how many I've lost? 0. — Prenote • (talk)
492
2017-09-04 00:17:58.000000 UTC
7988159740.23754409Problems with Wikipedia One of the problems with Wikipedia, is that there are some who just shouldn't be here. Who think they are exempt from which are paramount in this project. Who think it's okay to swear at people, as much as they want even when informed that is not okay, who treat the list of, one of the essential parts of our , as some kind of daily bucket list. Perhaps they are too long in the teeth. Perhaps they have just been here too long. But the bottom line is they are detrimental to the project, chase away too many editors, and I think Wikipedia would be a better place without them.
493
2017-09-04 00:03:32.000000 UTC
7988143100.23754409DYK for The Jewish Confederates— Maile (talk)
494
2017-09-04 00:59:29.000000 UTC
7988206260.23754409This is the worst case of Spanglish I have seen in a while. Either the full name Universidad de Los Andes should remain intact, or it should be translated completely into English, i.e. University of the Andes. Clearly this has been discussed over time and has not been rectified; however, failure to repair the title gives the appearance of, at best, neglect for such an important institution. SusunW (talk)
495
2017-09-04 10:20:03.000000 UTC
7988803550.23754409Deletion of Rahul Haridas page You people aren't following your own rules.
496
2017-09-04 10:48:53.000000 UTC
7988836180.23754409Done. Widefox; talk
497
2017-09-04 11:25:07.000000 UTC
7988878180.23754409Are we certain he's truly Nigerian? I am going to change "English-Nigerian" to "British", and remove "Nigerian" from the infobox except someone provides a non-Nigerian source that says he has dual citizenship. Darreg (talk)
498
2017-09-04 11:47:59.000000 UTC
7988901540.23754409You just told User:Floquenbeam the other day that you won't touch it and yet here you are. It wasn't "I won't touch it unless I have a decent reason" it was "I won't touch it." I also notice that in addition to making the comment there, you've also gone to the articles involved in a few ANEW cases and inserted yourself into the dispute by reverting users. That definitely does not help defuse matters. Take ANEW off your watchlist. Only go there if you need to report someone for a 3RR violation or you are accused of a 3RR violation. This is at least the third thread someone has made on your page about your unnecessary actions at ANEW. I'm not sure what it's going to take to get you to stop. only (talk)
499
2017-09-04 10:16:28.000000 UTC
7988798690.23754409I even said him to learn the wikipedia rules and basics first but he ignores me, what should I do if he doesn't wanna listen to me? Pure conSouls (talk)
500
2017-09-04 10:25:05.000000 UTC
7988809240.23754409InternetArchiveBot work wrong 1 - please, don't remove '\n' symbols from template. Also, it's not a dead link, you still can read this review on original place. Maybe some sites block your bot for useragent? 2 - links to jasrac.or.jp also still alive. Zero Children (talk)
501
2017-09-04 10:17:35.000000 UTC
7988800100.23754409The paragraph on this subject within Alfa-class_submarine#Project_Sapphire has more and better information than this article. Someone who is a writer (not me I have terrible writing skills) needs to add to it.
502
2017-09-04 11:10:13.000000 UTC
7988860900.23754409Although I agree with you that, e.g., stig-MAH-tuh is ugly, and STIG-muh-tuh is better (and is what the 1910 OED gives), Wikipedia is not a prescriptive dictionary, and doesn't give advice. The common pronunciations seem (alas) to have changed, and the Merriam-Webster offers both pronunciations. Arguing from the Greek and Latin pronunciation isn't helpful, because English pronunciation often doesn't follow it, and is without a source. If you can find sources (Fowler?) about the pronunciation, the appropriate way to add the information would be something like:
503
2017-09-04 11:48:48.000000 UTC
7988902320.23754409You're probably talking about Simferopol incident, which isn't the case discussed here. Simferopol incident casualties were both combatants, not civilians. VoidWanderer (talk)
504
2017-09-04 10:51:37.000000 UTC
7988839130.23754409Samuel SaizHi. You have protected the Samuel Saiz page so I can not correct the seasonal appearance tables ... it is missing a Leeds United Totals row. And does it really need to be protected for as long as you have done so, attacks on Leeds players tend to die down a week or so after they sign/leave Exeter White (talk)
505
2017-09-04 10:54:56.000000 UTC
7988842940.23754409text = NEW EDITORS: If I have inadvertently reverted your good faith edits and warned you regarding vandalism or similar, please do not take offense. Leave me a note in a new section on this page and, upon review, I will revert my own edits and remove the warnings. This is preferable to you simply undoing my reverts, where I am less likely to recognize that you are undoing them in good faith. Lastly, please maintain civility while conversing. Problems are best settled keeping a cool head.
506
2017-09-04 22:16:45.000000 UTC
7989737620.23754409Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Xiumin, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
507
2017-09-04 22:33:29.000000 UTC
7989755540.23754409So you are open to alternatives, but only if they meet your very narrow criteria. The existing images are not of topless women protesting for the right to be topless, so I'm not clear on why an image depicting that would be the only acceptable alternative. I am also not clear why a woman breastfeeding in public would not be an acceptable alternative. Or an image of a woman exercising her lawful right to be topless in public. Both of these are mentioned in the article. I don't know why you think it is a "stretch" that anyone will recognize the Raelian symbols that the women are wearing. I did. World's Lamest Critic (talk)
508
2017-09-04 23:27:37.000000 UTC
7989813450.23754409Yes, he's dead; see this column from The Inquirer. Nyttend (talk)
509
2017-09-04 22:56:23.000000 UTC
7989781370.23754409Proposed deletion of Da Man The article Da Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:Non-notable Indonesian men's magazine. Article has no independent sources.World's Lamest Critic (talk)
510
2017-09-04 22:43:21.000000 UTC
7989765950.23754409You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Genevieve Cortese. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
511
2017-09-04 16:22:47.000000 UTC
7989246820.23754409Side drama over Trump There is some ongoing contention about whether Anglin endorsed Trump because he said that Mexican immigrants were causing problems or Mexican illegal immigrants. I reverted ClueBot last week because apparently it has been programmed to remove the phrase "illegal immigrant" from Wikipedia, but I did not think that Trump had made a blanket statement about all Mexican immigrants and so that violated BLP. But someone reverted me, citing Washington Post that he said it about all Mexican immigrants. Well, I looked further and in context that he spoke about speaking with "border guards" immediately afterward, I still think he meant illegals only, but it's not as clear as I'd like. As it presently stands, the whole thing was taken out by the last person to revert.This is a tricky subject - we don't want to violate Trump's BLP, we should convey his actual position and/or how it looked to Anglin (and racists in general?). The relation of Trump's campaign to racism and the popularity of racism and the reaction against racism is of top relevance to understanding the political context here. So I'm loath to leave it in the current stump form but maybe someone can suggest a better way. Wnt (talk)
512
2017-09-04 17:12:10.000000 UTC
7989313910.23754409You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hans Marchand. Favonian (talk)
513
2017-09-04 17:15:54.000000 UTC
7989319090.23754409reversion Of Fukashima black out you reverted my revision without reading the talk page or making a comment on the talk page.You leave undocumented text in the article, and the reason it is undocumented is that it cannnot be doccumented, and that is because it is false in its immplications. Bad job. If you are proud of lowering the accuracy of wikipedia, comngratulations. (User:MartinGugino Martin User_talk:MartinGugino talk • contribs )
514
2017-09-04 17:30:49.000000 UTC
7989339290.23754409Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Template:Kansas City Chiefs roster and Tanoh Kpassagnon, you may be blocked from editing. Rockchalk717
515
2017-09-04 17:00:51.000000 UTC
7989297240.23754409This is your only warning; if you deliberately trigger the edit filter again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pillowfluffyhead (talk)
516
2017-09-04 17:12:29.000000 UTC
7989314330.23754409Speaking of misrepresentation when did I ever say I endorsed Nukhazhiev? I don't. Not a fan of him at all. But that a man put in place by a regime (Kadyrov) that is entirely grounded by Putin says these criticisms is telling, especially as the Kadyrov government has often gone against the typical Chechen view of these events (for example dismantling Dudayev's monuments to them). :::::Furthermore, your continued referencing of the fact that those who are "insulting" Pykhalov happen to be Chechen, as if their ethnicity fundamentally biases them (this is the most favorable reading of what you are saying, there are other much less favorable interpretations too), is discriminatory and disgusting. Please cut it out. I would never even think of saying the same of ethnic Russians. Your off-topic railing about so-called Chechen "traditions" is also disturbing. As for sources on what happens, yes I myself prefer to ignore both Russian and Chechen (notice I have not cited Akhmadov once or even used his book for this) sources but instead on the less involved sources of foreign countries, such as Moshe Gammer (Israeli), Derluguian (Armenian), John Dunlop and so on. Yes they exist. And Russian sources are often useful but when they are criticized extensively, accused of falsification, and happen to be from people involved in the Russian military (but see also press freedom in Russia) we cannot simply portray their point of view as the indisputable fact, when there is a dispute about it (indeed, on the alleged draft evasion there is the rival view, found I believe in  Горцы Кавказа в Великой Отечественной войне, that holds that draft numbers were low due to long running anti-Chechen discriminatory policies). Quite frankly, it is not your job to "check" whether Pykhalov falsified, and the accusation of his falsification went beyond just what you're discussing I'm sorry, but that is what NPOV is about. Of course, it seems curious that you already know how to use the terminology about NPOV :). Yalens (talk)
517
2017-09-04 02:54:48.000000 UTC
7988347350.23754409For the third time, please stop your disruptive editing. Nishan appeared in Manorama (film), why did you take this out of Nishan? —Anomalocaris (talk)
518
2017-09-04 03:44:41.000000 UTC
7988398540.23754409There is no end to this. I'll repeat this as many times as I have to to get it through your head. The sources don't exist because there is little coverage of this series online other than playthroughs. You're just choosing not to care. But I care. And if this is the way Wikipedia is run then it's simply a weak point of the system. Osh33m (talk)
519
2017-09-04 02:33:33.000000 UTC
7988322360.23754409Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did at Curse, you may be .Your edits have been automatically marked as and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Curse was changed by 103.36.5.189 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968277 on 2017-09-04T02:33:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk)
520
2017-09-04 02:07:00.000000 UTC
7988292940.23754409This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ildemaro Vargas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 24.250.244.20 (talk)
521
2017-09-04 03:04:02.000000 UTC
7988356640.23754409Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sasha Banks, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
522
2017-09-04 02:39:23.000000 UTC
7988329070.23754409G.U.T.=With the present in order to denounce you about the deletion of the Law of the Universe for proved scare about the originality of formulation of the G.U.T. If you United States are not able to accept that other had formulized the Law. I'm sorry.Now listen to me. I had 9 legal causes in my life and do you know how many I've lost? 0. — Prenote • (talk) (UTC+1)
523
2017-09-04 02:50:42.000000 UTC
7988343210.23754409=G.U.T.=With the present in order to denounce you about the deletion of the Law of the Universe for proved scare about the originality of formulation of the G.U.T. If you United States are not able to accept that other had formulized the Law. I'm sorry.Now listen to me. I had 9 legal causes in my life and do you know how many I've lost? 0. — Prenote • (talk)
524
2017-09-04 02:32:04.000000 UTC
7988320430.23754409Shame. Well, though - I guess it was a good 4 years (and a 1/2) or so .. Emaor (talk)
525
2017-09-04 03:25:34.000000 UTC
7988376610.23754409Why are you considering my reverts as "personal attacks" to you? You have already been blocked twice for POV edits and you even have the guts to report me to AIV just because I removed your POV edits. Please note, you have already been reported TWICE in for inserting POV edits and other editors have already taken notice on how you have titled the neutrality of several articles involving Ferdinand Marcos and Ninoy Aquino to be "pro-Marcos". You are shielding your edits using the policy, but at the same time, you are violating . See 1, and 2 in case you have forgotten the reason why you have been blocked. :Pinging, and admin in this thread. -WayKurat (talk)
526
2017-09-04 19:44:54.000000 UTC
7989535680.23754409Wikipedia's supposed to serious, not canonized story-tales, which I do enjoy because I follow this meta-mindtrip-faffing nonsense... Inventory is a game mechanic of a multi-media webcomic/video-game inspire shindig.. Magazine, equals must be true? Do you believe everything in print.. although I dig your user page and agree with a lot of your viewpoints. Ryan North must be a sentient human being and not a bot. Somebody made Dinosaur comics.. These things would happen to Calvin & Hobbes. Whatever happened to.. uh.. you know getting things offline? 'Cause unless you get a screenshot of a book... Anything can and will be printed. Amazon releases lots of books of reliable and unreliable.. sources and books have been around since the dawn of man. Internet stuff is easier access.. unfortunately nobody reads any printed text anymore. Hussie has many alter-egos.. The painting and blog, might not by of him/by him/ etc..66.79.241.58 (talk)
527
2017-09-04 19:28:38.000000 UTC
7989511030.23754409As someone currently in high school, teachers don't let you use Wiki because anyone can edit it, including highly biased people like us right now. Don't take what I said out of context. I apologize for my own hypocrisy, but you will never be allowed to downplay the fact that people tend to edit pages they have an intrinsic interest in. I never said everyone was antifa, but I said that people who generally support the movement, whether it be antifa, or feminism, or libertarianism tend to edit the pages about the topic. A fewer amount of people are critics who need to be heard as well to give a true NPOV due to diversity of opinion and viewpoint. That user is the only overt one that I have found looking back within the last 50 edits. I did indeed get mad, and will not do so in the future. FIREYSUNSET (talk)
528
2017-09-04 19:46:57.000000 UTC
7989538260.23754409Wikipedia's supposed to serious, not canonized story-tales, which I do enjoy because I follow this meta-mindtrip-faffing nonsense... Inventory is a game mechanic of a multi-media webcomic/video-game inspire shindig.. it's included in the "Bio" rant and Original Poster's rant... Magazine, equals must be true? Do you believe everything in print.. although I dig your user page and agree with a lot of your viewpoints. Ryan North must be a sentient human being and not a bot. Somebody made Dinosaur comics.. These things would happen to Calvin & Hobbes. Whatever happened to.. uh.. you know getting things offline? 'Cause unless you get a screenshot of a book... Anything can and will be printed. Amazon releases lots of books of reliable and unreliable.. sources and books have been around since the dawn of man. Internet stuff is easier access.. unfortunately nobody reads any printed text anymore. Hussie has many alter-egos.. The painting and blog, might not by of him/by him/ etc..66.79.241.58 (talk)
529
2017-09-04 19:56:35.000000 UTC
7989550780.23754409They have dropped it. Why did it take you guys so long to accept it? Of course they will not do a press release that they have become more evil, which can be implied when the old motto is removed. 2A02:8388:1640:9D80:0:0:0:4 (talk)
530
2017-09-04 19:01:46.000000 UTC
7989472650.23754409Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Darren Sharper, you may be . KGirl (Wanna chat?)
531
2017-09-04 18:42:00.000000 UTC
7989446220.23754409Hayal12 (talk) Hayal12
532
2017-09-04 19:30:57.000000 UTC
7989514590.23754409See . I just unwatched the page. I stand by my assertion that NPOV is being violated, but I am withdrawing from attempting to address the problem as a lost cause. Guy Macon (talk)
533
2017-09-04 18:39:47.000000 UTC
7989443010.23754409Emails Please don't reach me again. I find it badgering users and I don't want to be involved. Callmemirela 🍁 talk
534
2017-09-04 19:03:10.000000 UTC
7989474650.23754409You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Saeed Bozdar. EvergreenFir (talk)
535
2017-09-04 19:52:34.000000 UTC
7989545370.23754409Quite right. Spaniards were not in the habit of assigning English labels to places, and claiming that they did so in this case is simply false. Someon Imperial Ciudad de México''. 96.42.57.164 (talk)
536
2017-09-04 19:44:28.000000 UTC
7989535050.23754409This is going to be funny (or as funny as anything else on WP). I'll see what can be cooked up. Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉
537
2017-09-04 19:43:13.000000 UTC
7989533610.23754409Wikipedia's supposed to serious, not canonized story-tales, which I do enjoy because I follow this meta-mindtrip-faffing nonsense... Inventory is a game mechanic of a multi-media webcomic/video-game inspire shindig.. Magazine, equals must be true? Do you believe everything in print.. although I dig your user page and agree with a lot of your viewpoints. Ryan North must be a sentient human being and not a bot. Somebody made Dinosaur comics.. These things would happen to Calvin & Hobbes. Whatever happened to.. uh.. you know getting things offline? 'Cause unless you get a screenshot of a book... Anything can and will be printed. Amazon releases lots of books of reliable and unreliable.. sources and books have been around since the dawn of man. 66.79.241.58 (talk)
538
2017-09-04 19:28:23.000000 UTC
7989510690.23754409As someone currently in high school, teachers don't let you use Wiki because anyone can edit it, including highly biased people like us right now. Don't take what I said out of context. I apologize for my own hypocrisy, but you will never be allowed to downplay the fact that people tend to edit pages they have an intrinsic interest in. I never said everyone was antifa, but I said that people who generally support the movement, whether it be antifa, or feminism, or libertarianism tend to edit the pages about the topic. A fewer amount of people are critics who need to be heard as well to give a true NPOV due to diversity of opinion and viewpoint. That user is the only overt one that I have found looking back within the last 50 edits. I did indeed get mad, and will not do so in the future.
539
2017-09-04 19:49:59.000000 UTC
7989541840.23754409See above: §#Statement concerning DHS declaring Antifa as terrorist. =/  dsprc [talk]
540
2017-09-04 19:14:05.000000 UTC
7989489010.23754409You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. DBaK (talk)
541
2017-09-04 19:49:38.000000 UTC
7989541380.23754409See above: §#Statement concerning DHS declaring Antifa as terrorist. =/  dsprc [talk]
542
2017-09-04 19:01:29.000000 UTC
7989472210.23754409Hello! This is the userpage of the second account of A Great Catholic Person. I am the exact same person who operated the original User:A Great Catholic Person from 2014 to 2017. The majority of my edits were in 2017, and most were reverting vandalism.Now, reverting vandalism is one thing I need to change. Someone told me I can make enemies when I revert edits, and that's what I was like when many users reverted constructive edits. I will now focus on editing articles, but still will have to take down unconstructive edits. If you're reading this, and remember the original GCP rollbakcing your edits, I deeply apologize for provoking you. I know what's it's like to have my own contributions reverted for no dumb reason. I will steer away from reverting constructive edits like many unfriendly Wikipedians do.*Not only was your previous account blocked, but it was blocked for abusing multiple accounts. If you want to be allowed to edit again, you will need to request an unblock from your original account that addresses the reasons for its block, including your abuse of multiple accounts. —C.Fred (talk)
543
2017-09-04 18:26:23.000000 UTC
7989423860.23754409This is your only warning; if you deliberately trigger the edit filter again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pillowfluffyhead (talk)
544
2017-09-04 19:05:00.000000 UTC
7989477020.23754409Antifa: US security agencies label group 'domestic terrorists' http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/antifa-domestic-terrorists-us-security-agencies-homeland-security-fbi-a7927881.htmlthis seems to be needed to be added, any objections? Govindaharihari (talk)
545
2017-09-04 22:31:16.000000 UTC
7989753350.2371803You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
546
2017-09-04 18:27:16.000000 UTC
7989425310.23689207Re political borders : fully agree that cats don't care about them!! Using geopolitical blocks cannot only be but are misleading. BhagyaMani (talk)
547
2017-09-04 08:44:57.000000 UTC
7988711680.23684394action3=PR
548
2017-09-04 00:18:16.000000 UTC
7988160080.23656182One of the problems with Wikipedia, is that there are some who just shouldn't be here. Who think they are exempt from which are paramount in this project. Who think it's okay to swear at people, as much as they want even when informed that is not okay, who treat the list of, one of the essential parts of our , as some kind of daily bucket list. Perhaps they are too long in the teeth. Perhaps they have just been here too long. But the bottom line is they are detrimental to the project, chase away too many editors, and I think Wikipedia would be a better place without them.
549
2017-09-04 12:54:09.000000 UTC
7988971950.23647761The EndAll that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us years ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is more about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah who is seen now as some form of monster. The Palmer House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this incestual nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent? This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind ending in murder. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with a thousand different endings, some good and some evil. I am absolutely convinced that Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved. Incest is a scourge, and as he states in "Catching the Big Fish" he only wishes to help others attempt to heal as well through Transcendental Meditation. He has been indocrinating all of us.
550
2017-09-04 00:06:43.000000 UTC
7988147930.23634103Casualties I'm sorry, but I had to clean this paragraph up.Examples:"Axis military deaths were over 5.2 million(out of which 800,000 died in Soviet captivity).German losses according to: Rüdiger Overmans, Deutsche militärische Verluste im Zweiten Weltkrieg. Oldenbourg 2000., pp. 265, 272 This confused german deaths with axis deaths. Overmans states that 800.000-1.000.000 germans died in soviet captivity. But "axis" would also include romanians, hungarians, finns, soviet defectors, italians etc..The article later stated that only 374.000 german POWs died in captivity. This number is way too low and does not consist with the main article:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_casualties_in_World_War_II I also complemented the number of soviet POW death with those in G.I. Krivosheev's study. Krivosheev states, that most of these 3 million POWs were not military personnel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union I also corrected this:''"Most Axis POWs were released from captivity several years after the war, but Axis troops who captured Red Army soldiers frequently shot them in the field or shipped them to concentration camps to die"''This "comparative" statement implies that captured axis soldiers weren't killed in the field, which is wrong. The next sentence says: ''"Hitler's notorious Commissar Order called for Soviet political commissars, who were responsible for ensuring that Red Army units remained politically reliable, to be summarily shot when identified amongst captured troops."''I think this already indicates that an order was given to shoot certain captured soldiers. It's also incorrect that other from being killed in the field the second option was "shipped to concentration camps to die". They were more frequently shipped to concentration camps to be used as forced laborers, where the mortility rate reached 57%, especially in late 1941. But this article does not focus on the first months of the eastern front alone. So I changed this sentence and added passages from this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_mistreatment_of_Soviet_prisoners_of_warIt now reads:''"Most soviet POWs were send to concentration camps to be killed or used as forced laborers. Additionally, millions of soviet civilians were captured as POWs and treated in the same manner. Many died on death marches. It is estimated that at least 3.3 million Soviet POWs died in Nazi custody, out of 5.7 million. This figure represents a total of 57% of all Soviet POWs and may be contrasted with 8,300 out of 231,000 British and U.S. prisoners, or 3.6%. About 5% of the Soviet prisoners who died were of Jewish ethnicity.[5]"''
551
2017-09-04 13:50:32.000000 UTC
7989036460.23593608Approximately three quarters of the words in this article are about the appearance, size, and shape of breasts. Plastic surgery is given around 600 words, which is more than the number of words on puberty, female sexual pleasure, cancer, and breastfeeding combined. From my perspective as a female reader, these ratios are plainly ludicrous. To make a more conventional Wikipedia argument, the article’s emphasis on breast size and shape, and on cosmetic surgery, is way out of line with how high-quality secondary and tertiary sources on breast health and sex education discuss the subject. The long sections on asymmetry and ptosis could be condensed to a few sentences each - these aspects are covered in far more detail than is necessary for a general article.This article has an emphasis on plastic surgery that fills up most of four sections. A more accurate title for this article right now could be “Breast size and shape, and how surgery can help”. The section on body image gives no alternatives to "a woman [who] considers her breasts deficient in some respect" except surgery and hormonal treatments. The idea of accepting one's body as it is is not mentioned. Given the limited extent to which the topic of plastic surgery is brought up in secondary and tertiary sources that discuss breast health for general readers, I think it warrants one section. In this, we should:
552
2017-09-04 07:37:43.000000 UTC
7988644580.23443985Fair enough. As for (more or less) reliable sources, I note that 't Hooft does have his own web page devoted to cranks, and we have emails reproduced by others, such as the following recent one: Sent: 30/08/2017 21:56:32 GMT Daylight Time Subj: Re: Kirchhoff’s Law: a problem Mr. ‘t Hooft, No matter how many times you invoke your ignominious “crackpot folder” argument, it will never be a scientific one. ''“OK guys, my crackpot folder over heated. I can’t cope with arguments based on name-calling. Please tell to yourself and your friends that you won the argument with ’t Hooft because he gave up. As long as you keep me out of your cc’s. As I said to one of you, I tried to help you by explaining my position, but you succeeded in ignoring my explanations, congratulations. I’m going back to work.” ‘t Hooft'' You lost the argument on scientific grounds, not because you “gave up”. You failed to adduce a single rational argument. People will now be given the opportunity to examine your remarks and those of Mr. White and myself so that they can decide for themselves. Crothers 137.205.100.173 (talk)
553
2017-09-04 13:11:35.000000 UTC
7988991720.23440935The EndAll that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us years ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is more about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah who is seen now as some form of monster. The Palmer House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this incestual nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent? This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind ending in murder. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with a thousand different endings, some good and some evil. I am absolutely convinced that Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved. Incest is a scourge, and as he states in "Catching the Big Fish" he only wishes to help others attempt to heal as well through Transcendental Meditation. He has been indoctrinating all of us.
554
2017-09-04 13:15:09.000000 UTC
7988995920.23440935The EndAll that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us years ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is more about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah who is seen now as some form of monster. The Palmer House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this incestual nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent? This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind ending in murder. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with a thousand different endings, some good and some evil. I am absolutely convinced that Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved. Incest is a scourge, and as he states in "Catching the Big Fish" he only wishes to help others attempt to heal as well through Transcendental Meditation. He has been indoctrinating all of us.
555
2017-09-04 16:39:12.000000 UTC
7989269200.23398215MelanieN, it's not "changing the subject" to insist that WP reflect RS reporting. 1) Rosenstein pointedly did not say he was making a "recommendation" - RS report that he was deeply troubled by his role in the whole affair, and that was too much for him to swallow. Sessions went along but Sessions is himself tainted in the entire Russian interference matter. 2) Since RS tell us the Sessions/Comey documents were created to provide a pretext, a rationale, or a legally or politically conforming "cause" for a decision President Trump had already reached and documented in a problematic way, WP should not call them "recommendations" when they were not recommendations, they were pretexts, rationales, or legally or politically conforming "causes" for Trump's action. I've stated that clearly many times here but the dogged opposition, which you appear now to have endorsed, has repeatedly declined to "address the central point", choosing instead to attack me personally. There's nothing phony about my expecting that the article not state in WP's voice that these documents were "recommendations". If you think recent RS, after more and more of the story is now revealed, are predominantly calling these documents recommendations, you could resolve the matter by showing us all the many RS accounts, since the latest revelation on Friday, that call the Justice Dept. documents "recommendations. Wouldn't that be a simpler resolution than biting me and disparaging my thoughtful "arguments" as "phony"? User:SPECIFICO SPECIFICOUser_talk:SPECIFICO talk
556
2017-09-04 05:48:18.000000 UTC
7988524430.2338529Warning you have made 3 reverts in the past 24 hours. This is . And I did explain this, I removed the rest because it is the UNDUE theories of Pykhalov, a man who is described as a Stalinist apologist, who is accused of inciting ethnic hatred and of source falsification. As per UNDUE we do not need three paragraphs of stuff derived from his work.Yalens (talk)
557
2017-09-04 23:35:33.000000 UTC
7989822310.2337379Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Slag. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk)
558
2017-09-04 06:08:04.000000 UTC
7988549300.2336046''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cody Ware, you may be blocked from editing. Zappa⚡Mati
559
2017-09-04 19:31:27.000000 UTC
7989515570.23322901This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Megatron, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk)
560
2017-09-04 03:52:50.000000 UTC
7988406910.23302469Hello! This is the userpage of the second account of A Great Catholic Person. I am the exact same person who operated the original User:A Great Catholic Person from 2014 to 2017. The majority of my edits were in 2017, and most were reverting vandalism.Now, reverting vandalism is one thing I need to change. Someone told me I can make enemies when I revert edits, and that's what I was like when many users reverted constructive edits. I will now focus on editing articles, but still will have to take down unconstructive edits. If you're reading this, and remember the original GCP rollbakcing your edits, I deeply apologize for provoking you. I know what's it's like to have my own contributions reverted for no dumb reason. I will steer away from reverting constructive edits like many unfriendly Wikipedians do.
561
2017-09-04 19:03:51.000000 UTC
7989475430.23280713September 2017 Get a job or I'll stop coming. Widr's welfare check (talk)
562
2017-09-04 15:08:29.000000 UTC
7989137660.2313608They did stand by their claims. As to when they did so, that isn't relevant. When you make a claim without a shred of evidence other than a post by a troll, you are doing a bad thing no matter how long it takes someone to notice and complain. And when you have zero evidence other than a posting by an internet troll to back up your claim, it is wrong to stand by your claim for any amount of time.:::::::Again, the SPLC cannot name the restaurant, the time of the alleged meeting, or anyone who attended it. There are no witnesses of any meeting, not even an announcement on any of the Nazi websites. Just an anonymous post by "Concerned Troll" who wrote "The Amana Colonies might be a sweet place to meet. There is an awesome free shooting range on Amana road (sic) plus it is a historic German community". That's it. David Rettig, executive director of the Amana Colonies and Visitors Bureau, says that he attempted to reach out to the SPLC as soon as he learned about the map, but nobody from the civil rights organization would return his message. "It was a shock to us when we found out," he said. "We’ve checked around with the sheriff (Rob Rotter) and he indicated to me there is absolutely no hate group operating in the Amana Colonies, and he checked with his superiors in Des Moines and there are no reports … we’ve seen nothing of this, visitors or residents." Rotter backed up Rettig’s remarks" "There is no such neo-Nazi group in Iowa County." and that the SPLC was "irresponsible at best. I would hope that the SPLC is a more responsible organization than this example of their professionalism exhibits." The Des Moines Register contacted the SPLC, and Ryan Lenz, a senior investigative writer for the SPLC initially told them that claims by community and Iowa County leaders that no such groups exist in the town are wrong. Then later, after there was a storm of controversy, they changed the claim that this imaginary hate group is "statewide". And yet the SPLC still refuses to provide any evidence other than the internet post by "Concerned Troll".:::::::I will now return you to the usual apologists who will either claim that the above behavior by the SPLC was acceptable or that this article should not cover the incident in detail. Guy Macon (talk)
563
2017-09-04 05:56:08.000000 UTC
7988532710.23115183''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' September 2017 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ronnie Hillman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride
564
2017-09-04 03:58:41.000000 UTC
7988412680.23104265SPECIFICO, snarky replies like the one above are really not helpful to collaborative discussion. Trump drafted his own letter citing his own rationale for firing Comey, but McGahn suggested that the official justification for the dismissal should be Sessions's and Rosenstein's long-standing concerns about Comey's handling of the Clinton email investigation. Those are the facts, as reported by The New York Times et al., and they have not been disputed by any reliable source. Let's not conflate the facts with opinion, analysis, or moral judgement. Once we agree on the facts, we can debate how best to convey the relevant information to readers. You should have retracted your unsupported assertion that long ago.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk)
565
2017-09-04 10:01:42.000000 UTC
7988783670.23087639Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at 2001: A Space Odyssey (film). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned before regarding sub-heads in the lede, please stop now. David J Johnson (talk)
566
2017-09-04 06:39:39.000000 UTC
7988592780.23047793I stand by my description. I have no AGF in an editor who had previously tried to remove the term "criminal" from the article, and is now trying to claim that someone convicted of murder is not a murderer. The editor's edit summaries said nothing about disputing " mass murderer". He or she stated more than once that Manson was simply not a murderer at all. That's POV pushing. One editor added the material and two others restored it after the removal was considered vandalism. We have heard from the two editors who restored the material. We have not heard from the editor who originally added the material, from the editor who removed it, or from anyone else (you did not state your opinion on the material), and yet you seem to think that there is now consensus, or do I misinterpret "there was not (up until now) any consensus to include it"? I don't see how this talk page can be a consensus if the article edits are not. If you want to support the removal yourself then do so. If anyone else wants to support the removal I'm happy to consider their opinions too. Otherwise I suggest that we drop this. Meters (talk)
567
2017-09-04 01:56:01.000000 UTC
7988280530.23026958Please let me briefly state a few things here. About 5 years back I came upon this article of my pastor, and it was a slanderous, distorted mess, put up by individuals highly antagonistic to RB Thieme. I worked for a few years against much opposition to get the article where it accurately stated what he was about. Now, several years later, it has come under attack again. The content I removed was only recently added, originating from a concerted press smear campaign against a political candidate the press did not like. The press allegations are false. I have little doubt the motivation behind including this one paragraph which pays disproportionate attention to these defamatory remarks. At any rate, I've got better things to do with my time these days. If this content is what you like, then have it. Bye.
568
2017-09-04 20:07:14.000000 UTC
7989567620.23005223Wikipedia editors' IP addresses are pretty easy to check. I could have looked and seen where you were editing from, but I figured I'd just ask you. I assumed you were from Lebanon given your fandom for Layal Abboud. I think it's cool that you brought something from the Arabic-speaking world to the English-speaking Wikipedia, but there may be other editors from your region who do this with the intent to disrupt this platform—People from all over the world do this! But it may be that more people from your region do this and that the admins noticed some things that match a pattern of abuse, so they blocked you. My advice to you is to go through the appeals process. I've had to appeal many things on Wikipedia, and this thing is just one of many appeals you'll have to make in working here. Best of luck and let me know how it goes. Morganfitzp (talk)
569
2017-09-04 10:49:40.000000 UTC
7988837050.23005186It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Mentioning Slavic gords you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Oliszydlowski,
570
2017-09-04 18:49:36.000000 UTC
7989456200.23003802Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Irma Stern, you may be . KGirl (Wanna chat?)
571
2017-09-04 04:02:44.000000 UTC
7988417290.2296663Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Indian epic poetry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
572
2017-09-04 16:18:53.000000 UTC
7989240790.22894156This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Teesri Kasam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Raritydash (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
573
2017-09-04 15:28:34.000000 UTC
7989170860.22888109Your edit summary and comment "I will now return you to the usual apologists" Guy, you've been around long enough to know better than that. Doug Weller talk
574
2017-09-04 13:29:09.000000 UTC
7989011340.22853376action2=PR
575
2017-09-04 21:55:29.000000 UTC
7989711160.2284573Since you take such offense with the term, I note that used the word themselves at Deletion Review. Please the content of the remarks before you make unfounded accusations as you make yourself look . cc . Hasteur (talk)
576
2017-09-04 10:50:03.000000 UTC
7988837380.22819225It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Oliszydlowski,
577
2017-09-04 12:19:52.000000 UTC
7988932940.22801392You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Red Lake shootings. Hayman30 (talk)
578
2017-09-04 23:41:40.000000 UTC
7989829540.22774674While the attacks against the supposed "atheism" above were over the top[*], still the information that you who say that aren't a religious person is not unimportant in this context, and thank you for it. Reason is, plainly, it makes a difference whether someone who wants to worship in a House of God judges a House of God by what his religion says a House of God should look like, or if someone not wishing to worship in a House of God judges a House of God by what he thinks the religion he does not have should say a House of God should look like. In fact, the latter I guess always tend to be somber or else bombastic or else spartanic (with Protestants and those non-religious who have been brought up in their traditions); they never tend to look like Gaudì's works. If you take a Catholic now, chances are that you could get works like Gaudìs out of him, or, let us give due account to Gaudìs artistic singular ideas, at least an appreciation for it and love of it.::::*As an aside: And I am almost sure they did not come from a person breathing Catholic traditions. Not because all Catholics would be well-mannered; they aren't; but using the "atheism" accusation as a slander against those one disagrees with to make the disagreement even a bigger issue than it is, that is a Protestant thing to do. We Catholics know well that an atheist may be farther away from the truth than a Protestant but at the end of the day the point is that either is wrong; and also that most false ideologies that did tremendous damage weren't atheists. If we slander, we use other terms of abuse, it seems.2001:A61:20A8:CF01:A412:CC9F:A43E:74B7 (talk)
579
2017-09-04 22:36:38.000000 UTC
7989758900.22774334Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Peter, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
580
2017-09-04 16:01:45.000000 UTC
7989216970.22754341If you go with the logic that Macedonians from the Republic of Macedonia are not descendants of the Ancient Macedon because there were invasions of that territory at some point in history, then you can also argue that the Greeks today (black hair, dark eyes) have nothing to do with the Ancient Greeks, are not their descendants, but rather descendants of Turkish and Saracen invaders. You see, how this can be a slippery slope. Go explain to the Southern Italians and Sicilians, that since they were conquered by the Moors and Saracens, that their blood got mixed enormously, that they are not descendants of the Romans and Roman Empire; let's see if you come out of that one alive. Wikipedia has become so biased, it is utterly shameful. Especially, extremely Anglo-Saxon biased. Take the article about William the Conqueror and his invasion of England, the entire article and series of related articles is twisted so as to give no credit or indication that this was in fact a Frank (French) invasion and taken over of the British Isles. Normans, were and still are French, for they are Northmen (that came as Vikings) who mixed with the Franks. If this wasn't so, if William and his invasion wasn't French, why would the Kings of England later be claiming rights to the French Crown?
581
2017-09-04 06:41:44.000000 UTC
7988595130.2271498Chelsea Daniels (Anneliese van der Pol) is Raven's somewhat dim-witted, but sweet best friend and the mother of Levi. She married a wealthy man named Garrett, who was later arrested for tax evasion and had an affair with the law enforcement officer that arrested him. He stole all of her money, and she subsequently divorced him and moved in with Raven. While living with Raven, Chelsea often tries to cook for the family, which goes horribly awry.
582
2017-09-04 09:35:28.000000 UTC
7988754980.22701575Yes - I know what you tried to link. Read what I said again. I think I'm reaching the same conclusions as above - you either don't have the competence to edit here, or you're deliberately making no attempt. Begoon
583
2017-09-04 15:19:59.000000 UTC
7989155920.22700123You may be without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Freshers-Job.Com. I dream of horses  @
584
2017-09-04 10:10:56.000000 UTC
7988792930.22676736I see you've been already blocked by another admin. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)
585
2017-09-04 13:02:11.000000 UTC
7988980910.22663574no it isn't your fault but with a report on edit warring it could possibly block you both. I honestly think TDLWH is in the wrong but I have to be fair and report both of you. You both reverted each other. We just uav3 to see how it all goes. With what he did and said I believe he will be blocked rather than you however. ♠Dinah♠ 🎤
586
2017-09-04 01:01:37.000000 UTC
7988208830.22656451It's not the same complaints. We see now that I am focusing on the existence of the Sexual characteristics article. The Sexual characteristics article was not mentioned before; I'd overlooked it (even though I'd clicked on it before, and am shown to have made a small edit to it in 2013). And given your above arguments, I don't see how I could have been bold without you challenging matters. I would rather not be bold only to be reverted; I would rather have consensus first. And, anyway, disputes are revisited all the time on this site; you know that. You stated, "Documenting that does not preclude anything else happening on this page regarding any other content." The issue in this regard is you giving far too much weight to non-primary usage and arguing for the title of the article based on that usage. Flyer22 Reborn (talk)
587
2017-09-04 11:56:22.000000 UTC
7988909400.22566922Are we certain he's Nigerian? ,, , , , I am going to change "English-Nigerian" to "British", and remove "Nigerian" from the infobox except someone provides a non-Nigerian source that says he has dual citizenship. Darreg (talk)
588
2017-09-04 18:51:20.000000 UTC
7989458460.22564705I would revert your edit again if you try to change it, as the sentence you are attempting to re-instate, is well, total garble-ation.
589
2017-09-04 04:06:52.000000 UTC
7988421580.22538333Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sheldon Richardson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
590
2017-09-04 04:20:41.000000 UTC
7988434500.2251812Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Emilia Clarke. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
591
2017-09-04 10:19:21.000000 UTC
7988802770.22508378A barnstar for you! {style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" The Original Barnstar|-|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" Thanks for all your contributions and expansion of terrorism related articles. Hope you will continue. Greenbörg (talk) |}
592
2017-09-04 00:54:32.000000 UTC
7988200640.2249835It's not the same complaints. We see now that I am focusing on the existence of the Sexual characteristics article. The Sexual characteristics article was not mentioned before; I'd overlooked it (even though I'd likely clicked on it at some point). And given your above arguments, I don't see how I could have been bold without you challenging matters. I would rather not be bold only to be reverted; I would rather have consensus first. And, anyway, disputes are revisited all the time on this site; you know that. You stated, "Documenting that does not preclude anything else happening on this page regarding any other content." The issue in this regard is you giving far too much weight to non-primary usage and arguing for the title of the article based on that usage. Flyer22 Reborn (talk)
593
2017-09-04 00:51:12.000000 UTC
7988197010.2249835It's not the same complaints. We see now that I am focusing on the existence of the Sexual characteristics article. The Sexual characteristics article was not mentioned before; I'd overlooked it (even though I'd likely clicked on it at some point). And given your above arguments, I don't see how I could have been bold without you challenging matters. I would rather not be bold only to be reverted; I would rather have consensus first. And, anyway, disputes are revisited all the time on this site; you know that. You stated, "Documenting that does not preclude anything else happening on this page regarding any other content." The issue in this regard is you giving far too much weight to non-primary usage and arguing for the title of the article based on that usage. Flyer22 Reborn (talk)
594
2017-09-04 15:16:42.000000 UTC
7989150880.22468734Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Freshers-Job.Com, you may be blocked from editing. Dammitkevin (talk)
595
2017-09-04 04:03:22.000000 UTC
7988417860.22322172''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Succulent plant, you may be blocked from editing. Animalparty! (talk)
596
2017-09-04 02:38:03.000000 UTC
7988327620.22319652Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ray Toro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
597
2017-09-04 11:27:36.000000 UTC
7988881030.222729But nobody here wants the article to say that Šantić lived in Yugoslavia. What I am saying is that it is perfectly accurate to say that he was a Yugoslav national because Yugoslav was the adjective corresponding to the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. I even cited examples for such usage, which you do not appear to have understood.:::::I am also not arguing in favor of retaining the Bosnian Serb thing. You removed it and then I removed the source which backed it, but then you inexplicably restored the source. Do I really need to go into why that does not make sense? Surtsicna (talk)
598
2017-09-04 05:31:40.000000 UTC
7988508710.22271842''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:Cmguy777, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk
599
2017-09-04 22:21:12.000000 UTC
7989742940.22261532Page namePer the discussion at Talk:Death of Victoria Martens, where the victim was obviously killed by someone else but no one has been convicted, I think this page should be moved to Death of Judy Smith. Yoninah (talk)
600
2017-09-04 12:41:42.000000 UTC
7988957550.2218256You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lingayatism. Kleuske (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
601
2017-09-04 17:06:51.000000 UTC
7989305950.22167034Given that it's your talk page, and you are not a blocked editor, you may feel free to simply blank the page by deleting all of the text in the edit window and saving the edit. (Don't forget the edit summary of "Blanking own page" or what have you.) Removing messages in this way merely confirms that you've seen them. We don't usually delete user talk pages, unless there's some unusual circumstance (like personal information or threats or whatever). UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did
602
2017-09-04 09:25:30.000000 UTC
7988745900.22124135I have not been particularly impressed with some of 's approaches to editing, such as on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candice Hutchings (and the only reason I'm mentioning this here is so you don't turn round and accuse me of being in collusion with him). Now, with that out of the way, Cavecanem101 - knock it off. Nobody is adding the tags because they're feeling malicious or bullying, they just want to alert the wider community that the article needs attention (which it does) and should be looked at with a view to improvement. It's nothing personal. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)
603
2017-09-04 03:18:06.000000 UTC
7988369710.22108732Sure thing. Just to make sure I'm not missing anything: it looks like the chief subcats that need to be removed are and, right? Shouldn't take me too long. Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa.
604
2017-09-04 15:23:43.000000 UTC
7989162650.22105029Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shar Pei. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I dream of horses  @
605
2017-09-04 23:41:43.000000 UTC
7989829620.22049533You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Troup, Texas. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
606
2017-09-04 13:41:16.000000 UTC
7989025630.22045426Different organizations of the Mapuche people have written a document saying that the RAM does not exist and that it is a creation of the intelligent services to accuse the Mapuche of terrorism and allow the Argentine government to use against them the Anti-Terrorist law. See here and here.EvaristoDLR (talk)
607
2017-09-04 22:12:48.000000 UTC
7989730900.22027576Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Xiumin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
608
2017-09-04 15:45:14.000000 UTC
7989195260.22026491I guess it comes down to whether or not it's relevant, otherwise can be immediately applied. I think you should steer clear of AN/I for a while, I've been trying to do the same too. Can you do that for me? Anyway, I am not familiar with GamerGate also, other than one of the sanctioned editor was responsible for my block log (interesting fact of the day, lol). Here's another distraction read for you if you haven't read it already. Alex ShihTalk
609
2017-09-04 00:37:16.000000 UTC
7988181010.21989483You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Dawnseeker2000 :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
610
2017-09-04 21:27:46.000000 UTC
7989675360.2195532Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Tom Jones (singer). Such attempts to will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk)
611
2017-09-04 20:22:28.000000 UTC
7989588620.2194349Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
612
2017-09-04 04:18:02.000000 UTC
7988432240.21923476Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to ACCC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
613
2017-09-04 02:34:11.000000 UTC
7988323090.21905294September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chicago (band). - FlightTime (open channel)
614
2017-09-04 11:44:52.000000 UTC
7988898460.21892962It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. '''Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital''' look at Germany, France, Lithuania, Belarus etc. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland. And I have been to Zalipie. A primitive small village of 700 people like that does not deserve recognition. It's like placing a separate section for Chernobyl tourism in Ukraine article. Completely pointless and unworthy.Oliszydlowski,
615
2017-09-04 08:27:01.000000 UTC
7988696830.21889776ALEVZOTIXX IS ONE ALBANIAN GOD.AREA: 1.)HEAD.AREA: 2.)HEART.AREA: 3.)CHEATS.AREA: 4.)INFINITY.AREA: 5.)FEELGOODXX.AREA: 6.)BACKUPXX.AREA: 7.)FOOTBALL.AREA: 8.)MODEL.AREA: 9.)MULTITALENTEDXXAREA: 10.)EVRYTHINGXX.MAKED BY MAD HACKER CODE: JBL15GUARDED BY APOKALYPSE: ANTIGODXXVIX NUMER 15 VIX NAME ALEVZOTIXX.HTTP://ALEVZOTIXX.NPAGE.EU/1985 - ∞.-VIP MEMBER.= $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$MULTIMILIARDER$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.-VIH OWN MEMBER & OWNER.-VIX OWN WITH 88888888 COPY. ALL EDICIONS VERSIONS, DIMENSIONS.-VIX ANOTHER WITH NAME. AZ & ALEVZOTIXX. 1 COPY.-VIX ANOTHER WITH NUMER. NR.15. 1 COPY. ALEVZOTIXX ALB ZOT.
616
2017-09-04 15:19:25.000000 UTC
7989154980.21828696Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hurricane Beulah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I dream of horses  @
617
2017-09-04 02:46:36.000000 UTC
7988338380.21821633Check the link: "Questionable sources are those that have a poor reputation for checking the facts, lack meaningful editorial oversight, or have an apparent conflict of interest." Cambalachero (talk)
618
2017-09-04 11:32:18.000000 UTC
7988885730.217993All the "F"s. I don't think there was a FORTRAN(F), but I know there was COBOL. I seen to recall even a COBOL(E)!Peter Flass (talk)
619
2017-09-04 18:39:27.000000 UTC
7989442460.2179824Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. zzuuzz (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
620
2017-09-04 21:09:56.000000 UTC
7989651120.21785742You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Haslingfield. Shellwood (talk)
621
2017-09-04 21:09:51.000000 UTC
7989650920.21785742You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Japanophile. Shellwood (talk)
622
2017-09-04 12:54:40.000000 UTC
7988972640.21776645i know, i should using template of same ip with User:S.Haboush. but it's not really necessary when both are busy on editing, i have no Sockpuppet i don't need it, i just wanted someone to help me who sit beside me in real world, so he created his account cz he interested to editing. i am 7 years here in wikipedias. this block is not reasonable, i have no idea who are they listed as my Sockpuppets (maybe cz i use vpn for unblocking, i think you know there is many websties blocked for me as a middle eastern internet user) i just know one of them, using same ip is not Sockpuppeting! many ppl like to edit with their friends here. many ppl are family members here. i had this issue in FaWiki before and i am not that kind of users. i just wanna back to editing as all the other users. i am here to help not this stuffs about Sockpuppets. i am making useful contributions right now, u can see my history of contributions. ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk)
623
2017-09-04 11:38:33.000000 UTC
7988891630.21776424Fowler&fowlerAre you kidding me ASI is (Archaeology Survey of India) andwhat can be bigger source than ASI itself.I am adding it back please don't do edit war. -IndianEditor (talk)
624
2017-09-04 21:35:48.000000 UTC
7989686450.21756232"Dried meat"? Is Jerky a universal term in English, or is it considered primarily a USA term? I note this because of the plethora of types of dried meat in other cultures. Kortoso (talk)
625
2017-09-04 21:47:01.000000 UTC
7989701130.21746093September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2-D (character), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk)
626
2017-09-04 04:24:24.000000 UTC
7988437670.21665992Please comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar The is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar. Legobot (talk)
627
2017-09-04 04:45:55.000000 UTC
7988460810.21660607a riddle 4 U, answer yes or no If I were to ask you the question, "Are you a peeeeeee-dough-file, a member of nambla?" would your answer to that question be the same as your answer to this question?
628
2017-09-04 05:04:52.000000 UTC
7988479750.21647313Salted before I read this. Orange Mike Talk
629
2017-09-04 00:40:51.000000 UTC
7988184850.21616153You're putting words into my mouth. No one's saying the word Yugoslavia wasn't used before 1929. However, it's totally nonsensical to say Šantić lived in Yugoslavia, when he did not. He died five years before the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was renamed to the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Yes, some people called the state Yugoslavia, but that wasn't the legal / formal / official name of the state. It's simply a question of accuracy, I really don't see why such a banal fact has to be subject to controversy. People casually called Austria-Hungary "Austria", yet when we are being accurate we call it Austria-Hungary. Also, Bosnia and Herzegovina were formally part of the Ottoman Empire until 1908, and at the very least both formally and de facto before 1878.::::You're right about the source saying "Bosnian Serb". This is however so obviously wrong that it's on the same level as requiring a source to prove that Sarajevo is Bosnia and not in Herzegovina. The sloppiness of such phrasing calls into question the credibility of the source. Looking into the author, it seems his area of expertise is Russian literature. He was not from Bosnia, but Herzegovina. So it doesn't make any sense to call him a Bosnian Serb. Herzegovinian, or Bosnian-Herzegovinian or from Bosnia and Herzegovina are all options that make some sense. Bosnian is the only option that doesn't make any sense whatsover. Calling people from Herzegovina Bosnians is inaccurate and lazy, despite the fact that many people do it. Nevertheless, I'll leave as it is because it's difficult to find a source for something so obvious.Jednokratno79 (talk)
630
2017-09-04 20:17:47.000000 UTC
7989582030.21601652Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Winners, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk)
631
2017-09-04 10:09:41.000000 UTC
7988791740.21520145Let us also agree that we are talking about "modern slavery," which the New York Times article that is cited defines as: Unlike historical definitions of slavery in which people were held as legal property, a practice that has been universally outlawed, modern slavery is generally defined as human trafficking, forced labor, bondage from indebtedness, forced or servile marriage or commercial sexual exploitation."
632
2017-09-04 05:00:51.000000 UTC
7988475380.2148446Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battlefield 1, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
633
2017-09-04 12:40:46.000000 UTC
7988956420.21462703How is it not applicable if T.J. Miller is in the cited source reviewing his Wikipedia page? Again, read closely:"Edits like this by subjects should not be treated as vandalism; instead, the subject should be invited to explain their concerns. "The idea that you would dispute objective biographical information and entirely neutral facts that come directly from the subject is unsettling at best. It suggest you are more interested in maintaining control over the page rather than ensuring it is as objective and accurate as possible. I have no connection to the Facebook page as it is not a Facebook page, it is a video, which I have no connection to. It seems you are either too myopic or lacking the ability to comprehend the rules and regulations you yourself cite.
634
2017-09-04 10:15:50.000000 UTC
7988797990.21388294Ahem? I've split off the toxicology to make a start. Chiswick Chap (talk)
635
2017-09-04 23:21:29.000000 UTC
7989807440.21239787You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Uncle Grandpa. BloodDoll (talk)
636
2017-09-04 10:45:26.000000 UTC
7988832070.21228956Wikipedia has clearly joined Google, Youtube and Facebook as liberally-slanted information sources. Watchdogs such as yourself operate under the guise of "neutrality" for the clear purpose of cleansing information that is unflattering and inconvenient to those with opposed viewpoints. I and many others have seen too many instances of double-standard when it comes to information sources and point of view. That doesn't make this an information source, but a narrative source... a liberal narrative source. You even deleted the entries on the talk page because you don't agree with them (as you'll probably delete this as well). It appears as though only talk that is flattering to those with a liberal bias is welcome.Don't bother answering. I know your response will be filled with denial and sit behind the shield of wiki policy. PNH es corrupto (talk)
637
2017-09-04 10:46:19.000000 UTC
7988833090.21228956Wikipedia has clearly joined Google, Youtube and Facebook as liberally-slanted information sources. Watchdogs such as yourself operate under the guise of "neutrality" for the clear purpose of cleansing information that is unflattering and inconvenient to those with opposed viewpoints. I and many others have seen too many instances of double-standard when it comes to information sources and point of view. That doesn't make this an information source, but a narrative source... a liberal narrative source. You even deleted the entries on the talk page because you don't agree with them (as you'll probably delete this as well). It appears as though only talk that is flattering to those with a liberal bias is welcome.Don't bother answering. I know your response will be filled with denial and sit behind the shield of wiki policy.PNH es corrupto (talk)
638
2017-09-04 10:48:03.000000 UTC
7988835040.21228956Wikipedia has clearly joined Google, Youtube and Facebook as liberally-slanted information sources. Watchdogs such as yourself operate under the guise of "neutrality" for the clear purpose of cleansing information that is unflattering and inconvenient to those with opposed viewpoints. I and many others have seen too many instances of double-standard when it comes to information sources and point of view. That doesn't make this an information source, but a narrative source... a liberal narrative source. You even deleted the entries on the talk page because you don't agree with them (as you'll probably delete this as well). It appears as though only talk that is flattering to those with a liberal bias is welcome.Don't bother answering. I know your response will be filled with denial and sit behind the shield of wiki policy.PNH es corrupto (talk)
639
2017-09-04 02:52:09.000000 UTC
7988344580.21211259Ok, I'm going to block you for making legal threats; see . You can get unblocked by apologizing for the threat and promising not to do it again (on your own talk page as you won't be able to edit anything else), but if you can't make yourself understood by writing in clear English you're not likely to last long here for other reasons. —David Eppstein (talk)
640
2017-09-04 08:44:52.000000 UTC
7988711560.21185337Ughhh, I don't see why anyone should push anyone else into not pluralizing an initialism just because the last initial happens to be the same letter as the one used to form the plural. There's no reasonable logic in that at all, which is why these so-called "editors" with the baseless concern have refused to discuss it: the simple matter is that they're just not able to back themselves up with any kind of sound logic. Simply put, their sad excuses for "arguments" (really nonexistent) have nothing better than "We're just not used to hearing it that way" written all over them. That's not a good reason to not allow these corrections, because the disallowance is logically senseless from all angles.
641
2017-09-04 17:19:11.000000 UTC
7989323820.21125077Kazi Nazrul Islam I forgot to mention some things. I'm having some problems determining if accepting a Government Invitation would grant one citizenship of that country. I assumed that it would be just that. I don't mean to be rude, but I want Wikipedia articles to be as accurate as possible and to have neutral point of view. As of now, I've done no edits to that article whatsoever. I'm not blaming you for anything. Like I said, Correct me if I'm wrong. DarkSpartan (talk)
642
2017-09-04 05:02:40.000000 UTC
7988477360.21120659You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dutch Schultz. Dairy{talk}:''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
643
2017-09-04 23:33:33.000000 UTC
7989820120.21115898You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. General Ization Talk
644
2017-09-04 09:45:49.000000 UTC
7988766920.21052475If nobody minds, I'm just going to step in here, because I think I know where the mistake lies. That White flight section mentions Dublin 15, which is Fingal, but if you actually just search "Dublin 15", for some reason, Google provides a map of Blanchardstown Shopping Centre! I think this editor simply saw that and made an assumption.::However, you're right in stating that at no point does that source/article state that it is the least ethnically white place in Ireland, it simply makes an example of an area experiencing a rapid influx of foreign migrants.::Hopefully this helps!
645
2017-09-04 06:36:03.000000 UTC
7988589110.21042374Please delete Rwhill2 (talk)
646
2017-09-04 12:46:56.000000 UTC
7988963680.20967801All that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us years ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is more about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah who is seen now as some form of monster. The Palmer House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this incestual nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent? This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with different endings, some good and some evil. Has America moved beyond these distinctions into a new realm? I am convinced Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved.
647
2017-09-04 00:36:58.000000 UTC
7988180750.20966937You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marvin Bagley III ‎. —C.Fred (talk)
648
2017-09-04 04:22:06.000000 UTC
7988435800.20894864Article completely ignores the first two centuries of the idea of American exceptionalism This article seems to completely ignore the first two centuries of the idea of American exceptionalism, starting all the way back with "A Model of Christian Charity". Is this simply an accidental omission, or has this been systematically kept out of the article? CJK09 (talk)
649
2017-09-04 21:22:22.000000 UTC
7989668230.20872012Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Remy Ma discography, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
650
2017-09-04 03:22:29.000000 UTC
7988373790.20861337Wikipedia:Protection policy#Semi-protection: This seems to be a marginal case for "semi-protection": See the comments by User:Activist above. :This is a biography of a living person that is receiving some vandalism. :How many incidents of vandalism can you document? If it's only 3, I don't know if the Administrators would want to apply "semi-protection". :See also Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection. :It's a biography of a living person, but is the level of vandalism annoying or actually disruptive? If it's only annoying, I think Wikipedia policy is to tolerate it. If it's disruptive, then the page should be semi-protected if I read the policy correctly. DavidMCEddy (talk)
651
2017-09-04 10:08:37.000000 UTC
7988790700.20824148On 30 June, Selassie spoke at the League of Nations and was introduced by the President of the Assembly as "His Imperial Majesty, the Emperor of Ethiopia" ("''Sa Majesté Imperiale, l'Empereur d'Ethiopie''"). A group of jeering Italian journalists began yelling insults and had to be ejected before he could speak. The Romanian chairman, Nicolae Titulescu, jumped to his feet and shouted "Show the savages the door!" ("A la porte les sauvages!").Selassie denounced Italian aggression and criticised the world community for standing by. At the conclusion of his speech, which appeared on newsreels throughout the world, he said "It is us today. It will be you tomorrow". France appeased Italy because it could not afford to risk an alliance between Italy and Germany; Britain decided its military weakness meant it had to follow France's lead. Selassie's resolution to the League to deny recognition of the Italian conquest was defeated and he was denied a loan to finance a resistance movement. On 4 July 1936, the League voted to end the sanctions imposed against Italy in November 1935 and by 15 July, the sanctions were at an end.On 18 November 1936, the Italian Empire was recognised by the Empire of Japan and Italy recognised the Japanese occupation of Manchuria; The Stresa Front was over. Hitler had supplied the Ethiopians with 16,000 rifles and 600 machine guns in the hope that Italy would be weakened when he moved against Austria. By contrast, France and Britain recognised Italian control over Ethiopia in 1938. Mexico was the only country to strongly condemn Italy's sovereignty over Ethiopia, respecting Ethiopian independence throughout. Mexico was amongst only six nations in 1937 which did not recognise the Italian occupation, along with China, New Zealand, the Soviet Union, the Republic of Spain and the United States. Three years later, only the USSR officially recognised Selassie and the United States government considered recognising the Italian Empire with Ethiopia included. The invasion of Ethiopia and its general condemnation by Western democracies isolated Mussolini and Fascist Italy. From 1936 to 1939, Mussolini and Hitler joined forces in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. In April 1939, Mussolini launched the Italian invasion of Albania. In May, Italy and Nazi Germany joined together in the Pact of Steel. In September 1940, both nations signed the Tripartite Pact along with the Empire of Japan.
652
2017-09-04 09:27:19.000000 UTC
7988747590.20811844Hi OshwahA sockpuppet investigation has been opened against 118 alex again. This is to inform you that you may need to testify that the accounts involved threatened to sockpuppet. The link is at [].Thanks,118.200.160.208 (talk)
653
2017-09-04 12:45:37.000000 UTC
7988962010.20792377All that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us years ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is more about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah who is seen now as some form of monster. The Palmer House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative's shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent. This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with different endings, some good and some evil. Has America moved beyond these distinctions into a new realm? I am convinced Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved.
654
2017-09-04 14:08:19.000000 UTC
7989058160.20754948Finally, The WAR ENDS 😄 Hi Guys, 1-Dinah Kirkland2-Pure conSouls3-Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi4-FerretGreetings 4 all the users above I Want EveryBody in the list above 2 know that the DAMN WAR between Me And Pure conSouls had finished, and the word "Officially" will b replaced with "To the public" by Dinah Kirkland, I wanna apologize 4 Pure, Dinah, Fortuna, and even Ferret .I want everybody above to accept my apologies, ESPECIALLY PURE CONSOULS .And we must know that the WAR couldn't be finished without the help of Dinah, Fortuna, and even Pure and Ferret .I wanna thank Dinah 4 her kindness and the great efforts she did 2 end this war .The WAR now had gone hell, and plz don't talk about it anymore . THANK U SO SO MUCH ....😊😘 TDLWH (talk)
655
2017-09-04 15:09:25.000000 UTC
7989139190.20746773Hines!! Corum's significance lies in his being the first to solidly study the formulation of German doctrine after the WWI. He was not the last. They all discovered that Guderian fantastically inflated his role.These include Williamson Murray in his article in Military Innovation in the Interwar Period, Robert Dinardo and many others. This article cannot ignore the truth in accomodation of your puppy love for Guderian. Do not delete referenced information because it disturbs your preconceptions. Indeed given the obvious and even alarming immaturity evident in your postings, I feel it is essential that you refrain from all editing related to matters you feel the least strongly about. You most certainly must abstain from editing this article. Read it if you must, but don't try to write it. Your insertions are certain to prove damaging. More constructively you can simply read Corum's book and maybe another book or two. You will definitely benefit from reading the references to your idol in Hitler's Bandit Hunters in Philip W. Blood. You need to be educated for your own good. Soz101 (talk)
656
2017-09-04 10:52:38.000000 UTC
7988840200.2071135It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Oliszydlowski,
657
2017-09-04 23:20:18.000000 UTC
7989806350.2070962Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Monarchy of Belgium, you may be . BloodDoll (talk)
658
2017-09-04 16:58:08.000000 UTC
7989293720.20703182RequestCan you please semi-protect the article Deportation of the Crimean Tatars for unregistered users? An anonymous IP keeps inserting a lot of undue weight in the article. If he has questions, he can always try to reach consensus on the talk page before resorting to disruptive editing.Seiya (talk)
659
2017-09-04 21:09:43.000000 UTC
7989650730.20685105You risk being blocked indefinitely Nelatti, you are now treading on thin ice. If you value the privilege of editing the Wikipedia, I suggest you start paying attention to the rules and respect them. You are very close to being blocked for ever. It is your choice. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk)
660
2017-09-04 17:17:25.000000 UTC
7989321380.2068413Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Happy Science, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk
661
2017-09-04 22:08:52.000000 UTC
7989726500.2066084Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Graphic design, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
662
2017-09-04 12:55:36.000000 UTC
7988973530.20636103Why block me? After your edit on PES 2018 I haven't touch that article. And after that TDLWH send me a message to finish the edit war and I accepted but soon after that he ran to Ferret. Its not my fault. 😯 Pure conSouls (talk)
663
2017-09-04 01:25:22.000000 UTC
7988240810.20628543Yeah, you might be right. I guess the week after the season ended was probably the worst possible time to talk about this. I'll check back in in a month or so. Hijiri 88 (聖やや)
664
2017-09-04 17:17:49.000000 UTC
7989321900.20597006I have reverted your edit at Talk:2017 China–India border standoff which strike-throughed certain comments in certain t/p discussions. Per we seldom strike out comments of banned/blocked users without any other solid reason.This is only allowed at XFDs/RfCs/RMs et al to prevent blocked sock-puppets/ban-evaders from biasing a consensus.Regards:)Winged Blades of GodricOn leave
665
2017-09-04 22:02:41.000000 UTC
7989719240.20590298Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ranch dressing, you may be . Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
666
2017-09-04 12:46:19.000000 UTC
7988962840.20584117All that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us years ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is more about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah who is seen now as some form of monster. The Palmer House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this incestual nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent. This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with different endings, some good and some evil. Has America moved beyond these distinctions into a new realm? I am convinced Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved.
667
2017-09-04 17:11:35.000000 UTC
7989313060.205375September 2017 This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Odion Ighalo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have already been warned about violations by adding bolded text without any explanation. Please cease. Mattythewhite (talk)
668
2017-09-04 01:39:08.000000 UTC
7988259940.20511903You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cambodia (song). You added a sales claim that was not supported by the reference you cited.Nqr9 (talk)
669
2017-09-04 12:14:03.000000 UTC
7988927350.20475644The next time you add controversial unreferenced material to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing, per edits like this. Canterbury Tail talk
670
2017-09-04 16:21:23.000000 UTC
7989244370.2046928If you go with the logic that Macedonians from the Republic of Macedonia are not descendants of the Ancient Macedon because there were invasions of that territory at some point in history, then you can also argue that the Greeks today (black hair, dark eyes) have nothing to do with the Ancient Greeks, are not their descendants, but rather descendants of Turkish and Saracen invaders. You see, how this can be a slippery slope. It has been proven that the Ancient Greeks, just like the Romans, looked much more like Northern Europeans (blond or fair hair, and light colored eyes), than like Mediterranean peoples as their modern descendants do now. Go explain to the Italians and Sicilians, that since they were conquered by the Moors and Saracens, that since their blood got mixed enormously, that they are now not descendants of the Romans and Roman Empire; let's see if you come out of that one alive. Wikipedia has become so biased, it is utterly shameful. Especially, extremely Anglo-Saxon biased. Take the article about William the Conqueror and his invasion of England, the entire article and series of related articles is twisted so as to give no credit or indication that this was in fact a Frank (French) invasion and taking over of the British Isles. Normans, were and still are French, for they are Northmen (that came as Vikings) who mixed with the Franks. If this wasn't so, if William and his invasion wasn't French, why would the Kings of England later be claiming rights to the French Crown?
671
2017-09-04 13:20:11.000000 UTC
7989001650.20464098September 2017 This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Davide Zappacosta, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Matthew_hk tc
672
2017-09-04 03:52:53.000000 UTC
7988406940.20458265I think you perhaps are not familiar with the fundamental policy . I have a little run down of how all the policies and guidelines hang together here it is. Jytdog (talk)
673
2017-09-04 15:41:08.000000 UTC
7989188990.204568I have given it a shot, hopefully everyone will agree allowing development without distraction for a short while.EnigmaMcmxc (talk)
674
2017-09-04 11:24:06.000000 UTC
7988876980.20425914September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Deli nk (talk)
675
2017-09-04 13:01:02.000000 UTC
7988979590.20410779Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Haseena Parkar, you may be blocked from editing. IdreamofJeanie (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
676
2017-09-04 17:46:49.000000 UTC
7989360740.20326433I often leave a welcome hoping that an IP will get an account and do some serious editing. You have far exceeded expectations! Jim1138 (talk)
677
2017-09-04 12:40:38.000000 UTC
7988956300.20273958FMC Not sure why were conflicting on that one. I'm trying to take the same approach we've mutually taken when it comes to OWNish behavior about CITEVAR. I see all these *VARs as limbs of the same creature. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 
678
2017-09-04 20:48:05.000000 UTC
7989622860.20262471Not a driving motivation for me.Carptrash (talk)
679
2017-09-04 13:57:18.000000 UTC
7989044940.20245637Investigation11111 (talk)
680
2017-09-04 20:59:35.000000 UTC
7989637140.20245637STKS91 (talk)
681
2017-09-04 15:02:34.000000 UTC
7989128830.20245637Chelseafan25 (talk)
682
2017-09-04 03:14:37.000000 UTC
7988366290.20245637Rev2424 (talk)
683
2017-09-04 13:59:10.000000 UTC
7989047430.20245634Investigation11111 (talk)
684
2017-09-04 22:20:55.000000 UTC
7989742600.20245634Khaledsalah (talk)
685
2017-09-04 22:20:38.000000 UTC
7989742220.20245634Khaledsalah (talk)
686
2017-09-04 21:26:20.000000 UTC
7989673680.20227635Removal of sourced content with untruthful edit summaries Your removal here with the edit summary of "Statement not in the references" is not true. The source: http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/25/magazine/the-education-of-dan-quayle.html?pagewanted=all states:* The Quayles have made some effort to distance themselves from the fundamentalist Houston preacher Robert B. Thieme Jr., notable for his pulpit attacks on do-gooders and liberals, power-mad labor, welfare recipients, homosexuals, gun controllers, rock music, feminists and the satanic United Nations. His audiocassette ministry offers tapes such as Slave Market of Sin and Satanic Plot No. 1.'' Mrs. Quayle's parents played the tapes of the Baptist minister - who is viewed with skepticism by many other evangelical church leaders in the South - when she was growing up. The Vice President's parents have said in interviews that they listen to Thieme tapes and attend Thieme conferences as well.''Did Thieme teach you this? It would appear that the stories of Thieme are true. Jim1138 (talk)
687
2017-09-04 12:13:42.000000 UTC
7988926970.20198973Unreferenced material The next time you add unreferenced material to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing, per edits liks this. Canterbury Tail talk
688
2017-09-04 02:54:33.000000 UTC
7988347110.20192437Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sasha Banks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
689
2017-09-04 23:09:47.000000 UTC
7989796030.2019159''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. All of your edits have been unexplained changes to dates in a variety of contexts. You will be blocked from editing for your next unexplained change.'' SummerPhDv2.0
690
2017-09-04 01:58:42.000000 UTC
7988283060.20188901The article is in poor shape, with youtube etc non-RS cited. However, the topic is notable because there are WP:RS on crypto-Hinduism (and crypto-Judaism, crypto-Buddhism, crypto-Islam for that matter) in the South Asian and Southeast Asian context. People were sentenced to death for the "crime". See, for example, pages 346-347 of this published by BRILL. I suggest we remove the non-RS there and tag it for refimprove for now. Others or we can work on it and add RS when we find time. Ms Sarah Welch (talk)
691
2017-09-04 17:40:44.000000 UTC
7989352020.20187548BKFIP Letting you know in advance that having stumbled on the now deleted statement at the Arbitration case request, and noted that you were the one to block as a sock of the banned Best Known For IP, I feel I must once more break a lance for this person. I plan to put it on AN/I rather than AN, although the community ban discussion was on AN, because I'd like not just admins to see the posting. I can't think of anywhere else as appropriate, although my first thought was the talk page of the arbitration case itself. Yngvadottir (talk)
692
2017-09-04 10:54:16.000000 UTC
7988842140.20181419it needs to be added as it gross $2.6 millionhttp://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=marvel2018b.htm this past weekend82.38.157.176 (talk)
693
2017-09-04 19:21:41.000000 UTC
7989500910.2017712Wikiklaas reverting my entry Veritylookingfortruth (talk)
694
2017-09-04 01:50:42.000000 UTC
7988275480.20135118Before you accuse anyone else of "vandalism", I recommend that you read up on Attempts to remove apparently incorrect information do not in any way qualify, and putting out false accusations of vandalism does not help the project. (As it is, the new number you inserted in there is also problematic, as you will find discussed on the ULC talk page.) Nat Gertler (talk)
695
2017-09-04 18:09:58.000000 UTC
7989398360.201295Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!{class="wikitable sortable" border="1" style="text-align: center;"|-! scope="col" Views/Day! scope="col" Quality! scope="col" Title! scope="col" Tagged with…|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 1459style="text-align: left;" Easter (talk)Add sources|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 290 style="text-align: left;" Dating sim (talk)Add sources|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 4334 style="text-align: left;" Lolita (talk)Add sources|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 161 style="text-align: left;" German Wikipedia (talk)Add sources|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 668 style="text-align: left;" Rosewood (talk)Add sources|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 69 style="text-align: left;" Hajime Sorayama (talk)Add sources|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 191 style="text-align: left;" Social software (talk)Cleanup|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 116 style="text-align: left;" Instant replay (talk)Cleanup|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 595 style="text-align: left;" Massively multiplayer online game (talk)Cleanup|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 22698 style="text-align: left;" Wiki (talk)Expand|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 316 style="text-align: left;" Vulnicura (talk)Expand|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 641 style="text-align: left;" Sexuality in Japan (talk)Expand|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 116 style="text-align: left;" Wikipedia in culture (talk)Unencyclopaedic|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 528 style="text-align: left;" Butch and femme (talk)Unencyclopaedic|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 110 style="text-align: left;" Pearls Before Swine (comics) (talk)Unencyclopaedic|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 488 style="text-align: left;" Hijab by country (talk)Merge|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 104 style="text-align: left;" Sexual characteristics (talk)Merge|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 23 style="text-align: left;" Seal dribble (talk)Merge|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;"style="text-align: right;" 465 style="text-align: left;" Effeminacy (talk)Wikify|- style="t
696
2017-09-04 11:03:43.000000 UTC
7988853660.20122635This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of airlines of Latvia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (see and for previous warnings) Matthew_hk tc
697
2017-09-04 10:55:10.000000 UTC
7988843160.20117174It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk. Oliszydlowski,
698
2017-09-04 21:55:02.000000 UTC
7989710700.20116644Since you take such offense with the term, I note that used the word themselves at |Deletion Review. Please the content of the remarks before you make unfounded accusations as you make yourself look . cc . Hasteur (talk)
699
2017-09-04 13:04:08.000000 UTC
7988982930.20106742From "1 inch flassid" to your recent accusations, BLP violations, citations of unreliable sources, and forum posts, it's pretty clear you're here to push an attempt at an agenda. Even your name might be a violation. Drmies (talk)
700
2017-09-04 22:01:10.000000 UTC
7989717300.20078763Nothing about her dob!Age!
701
2017-09-04 02:01:37.000000 UTC
7988286440.20060605f´(x)=f(x)?
702
2017-09-04 18:04:41.000000 UTC
7989389120.2003957Sonofagunner, if you want to cite Pykhalov then you should at least add that he's a pro-Stalin activist and revisionist. It's alright to quote Jeffrey Burds, but in the article you are citing Burds also writes: "Obviously, there are serious problems relying on Soviet and Russian sources to reconstruct any aspects of Chechen history. Russian depictions of the Chechen question are without exception heavily laden with a deep-seated antagonism towards the Chechens. (...) This elusive pursuit is further hampered by the fact that various Russian–Chechen or Soviet–Chechen wars over the past 200 years have virtually annihilated Chechen archives, libraries, and other resources, making it impossible to write a history of Chechnya without relying heavily on Russian sources." (page 283 footnote 55). Therefore, at least add that his findings are problematically entirely based on Russian sources, something which Burds admits to himself.I would also like to bring to your attention that adding three paragraphs on supposed Chechen-Nazi friendship is beyond the scope of what this article should be about. The article on the Armenian Genocide doesn't dedicate three paragraphs on how the Armenians were fifth collumnists for the Russians either. This is for good reasons: dubbing entire nations as fifth collumnists is the type of racism that has led to genocides in the first place. If you want to write more on Chechen-Nazi collaboration you can do that in Collaboration with the Axis Powers during World War II, Case Blue, History of Chechnya or any other relevant page. Machinarium (talk)
703
2017-09-04 19:13:02.000000 UTC
7989487570.20036036Please stop your . If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Radio, you may be . KGirl (Wanna chat?)
704
2017-09-04 09:35:21.000000 UTC
7988754830.20027488Crime Morning!I have added a new topic "crime" The Jay Cee Duggard care was listed in history and I felt it would be good to mention and reference some other notable cases in the history of the area. The Zodiac killer is a tenuous edit, but it does have solid reference in both wikipedia and outside sources, so I have added it.Take it easy!.—Optibeam (EDST)
705
2017-09-04 09:53:23.000000 UTC
7988775510.20015669is not Wikipedia policy, nor guideline, but a recommended method of dispute resolution. The policy in question here is:, which suggests that significant changes in Featured Articles are best made by discussing them on the talk page first. When the edit in question was made, there was either no one watching or the people who were watching chose not to intervene. Either way, the edit has been in the article for a significantly long time. It is 46 words long. Reverting it so many years constitutes a significant change, and, in my view, requires a discussion on the talk page. Prima facie, I don't see this as an example of bad faith POV-pushing, and it probably deserves a belated discussion. The Walk-Free Foundation's Global Slavery Index is compiled by the University of Hull's Kevin Bales, a professor of contemporary slavery there. So we certainly can't use the University of Hull to clobber the report. Let us at least agree that the 46 words in question are: India has the most people living in conditions of slavery, 18 million, most of whom are in bonded labour.India has the largest number of child labourers under the age of 14 in the world with an estimated 12.6 million children engaged in hazardous occupations.:::Let us also agree that we are talking about "modern slavery," which the New York Times article that is cited defines as: Unlike historical definitions of slavery in which people were held as legal property, a practice that has been universally outlawed, modern slavery is generally defined as human trafficking, forced labor, bondage from indebtedness, forced or servile marriage or commercial sexual exploitation." :::This is nothing new about India; Indians have known about it, in fact India's last Nobel Laureate for Peace Kailash Satyarthi has fought against the worst forms of child labor prevalent in India for the last 35 years. This is by no means the first time the NY Times has addressed the question of modern slavery in India. They ran an editorial on it in 2014, which seemed to especially implicated India. The editorial said, "India has, by far, more enslaved people than any country — more than 14 million. Three million are enslaved in China; two million in Pakistan; 1.2 million in Uzbekistan and one million in Russia." The NY Times also ran a http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/22/opinion/22kristof.html Nicholas Kristof column on it seven years before that, which said, Meena thus joined the ranks of some 10 million children prostituted around the world — more are in India than in any other country. The brothels of India are the slave plantations of the 21st century. Every night, Meena was forced to have sex with 10 to 25 customers. Meena’s owners also wanted to breed her, as is common in Indian brothels. One purpose is to have boys to be lab
706
2017-09-04 16:39:09.000000 UTC
7989269130.19985214September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WLS-FM, you may be blocked from editing. Tdl1060 (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
707
2017-09-04 01:22:18.000000 UTC
7988236570.19954687You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nanometre. Simplexity22 (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
708
2017-09-04 11:46:38.000000 UTC
7988900290.19936742Refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Shellwood (talk)
709
2017-09-04 04:20:34.000000 UTC
7988434320.1993335Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pliny the Younger, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
710
2017-09-04 11:12:05.000000 UTC
7988863070.1991167It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. '''Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital''' look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland. And I have been to Zalipie. A primitive village like that does not deserve recognition. Oliszydlowski,
711
2017-09-04 17:26:03.000000 UTC
7989333070.19910747See why I bailed out? Carptrash (talk)
712
2017-09-04 22:56:19.000000 UTC
7989781250.19855963September 2017 This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Fox News, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr. K. :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
713
2017-09-04 05:50:49.000000 UTC
7988526700.19839485RevertingPlease check carefully before reverting material, here:, you seem to have reverted without actually reading the Salon article, in which Horowitz is quoted as speaking specifically about this arson attack. Especially bad form during an active AfD.E.M.Gregory (talk)
714
2017-09-04 02:56:05.000000 UTC
7988348540.19807574Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amritsar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
715
2017-09-04 17:38:40.000000 UTC
7989349500.19792345Your rationale is precisely understandable.And in that case, I would happily agree with you striking the comments of the sockpuppeteers/ban-evaders (i.e TruthReigns) but not the comments of the sock-puppet(Adam4Math).Cheers:)Winged Blades of GodricOn leave
716
2017-09-04 19:54:52.000000 UTC
7989548530.19759731PPS. If you do want to go wading into the backstory at all (though of course I wouldn't blame you if you don't), the relevant DRN is here: .
717
2017-09-04 04:35:55.000000 UTC
7988450270.19742148Persistent sockpuppets See MCC page edit history, as well as all those new page creations (username should be logged in my CSD log). Thinking of reporting all these to and request CU, but might also got to report to admin's noticeboard of incidents. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
718
2017-09-04 13:52:51.000000 UTC
7989039220.19717479"Bombastic" The use of the term "Bombastic" is not only insulting, but it simply isn't true.Bombastic means: "high-sounding but with little meaning; inflated."This is a direct attack against a principled leftist for having policy positions that dont fit the norm. The source that claims to back up the insult of being "bombastic" doesnt actually provide any proof at all. I'm going to remove this line until someone can provide a reason for the use of such a random, yet insulting term.The Barron's are principled leftists and their policy positions haven't changed to warrant the use of the word bombastic.I'm going to remove this line until someone can provide a reason why it should stay on the page, because at this point its being used as insult to hurt them politically for no verifiable reason.
719
2017-09-04 21:27:16.000000 UTC
7989674810.19709758=Infobox=*Flawless ;)=Background and recording=*Unlink Nick Kamen*There isn't an article for "Sunspel", so you need to unlink it*had immediate impact with Levi's sales → comma before "with"*Link "Sex symbol" to its respective article*and its sales was also boosted → and its sales were also boosted*self-titled → eponymous*was the lead single from the album → was selected as the lead single from the record*But since she was → However, since she was*also contains background vocals by Madonna → refer to her as "the singer" here for alternation*The Latin Rascals did → "...handled"=Release and reception=*Robert Erdman took the cover artwork photograph of the 7" single, showing Kamen smiling, while Bob Merlis took the picture listed in the back cover, which is a black-and-white image of Madonna and Kamen in a recording studio. → What do you mean by "took" and who are those two people?*was released directed by → no "released" needed*After four weeks the song → comma after "weeks"*the top-100 → the top 100*In France the song attained → In France, "Each Time You Break My Heart" attained*Across Europe the song → comma after "Europe"*top-ten → top ten=Track listings=*Flawless ;)=Credits and personnel=*Flawless ;)=Charts=*Flawless ;)=Certifications=*Flawless ;)=Release history=*The article need a "Release history" section; take this as an example.=Other stuff=Copy-violation* 6.5% is super!References*As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article=Outcome=*Nice job with the article. I put it for 7 days. Good luck editing and best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk)
720
2017-09-04 03:25:52.000000 UTC
7988376840.19692679Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Il Capitano. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
721
2017-09-04 07:58:01.000000 UTC
7988663530.19688798No problem - have a good time away! I'll keep an eye out for anything exciting that happens here (??!!). Ghmyrtle (talk)
722
2017-09-04 05:30:38.000000 UTC
7988507680.19654453September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United States. General Ization Talk
723
2017-09-04 02:44:45.000000 UTC
7988335430.19601211''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Foam weapon, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization Talk
724
2017-09-04 02:40:44.000000 UTC
7988330670.19573537You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ray Toro. General Ization Talk
725
2017-09-04 05:59:56.000000 UTC
7988537250.19551083I'll do the parasites today if I get time. Comparing with red-throated loon, I see we have nothing on fossils, so that will need a look. Lockwood mentioned Kingsley's poem "The Sands of Dee", but the link seems too tenuous. Apart from parasites and fossils I think the content is comprehensive, but we need to check that the refs are all fit for purpose, remove the many overlinks (especially in Conservation) and general buff the prose to FA quality Jimfbleak - talk to me?
726
2017-09-04 12:44:47.000000 UTC
7988961120.19543517All that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us years ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah. The House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative's shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent. This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with different endings, some good and some evil. Has America moved beyond these distinctions into a new realm? I am convinced Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved.
727
2017-09-04 11:56:09.000000 UTC
7988909150.19519018It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. It existed for centuries but became only popularised more and more under Communism to link us with the east and Soviet Union. It did not represent the majority...maybe in the country in eastern Poland. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. '''Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital''' look at Germany, France, Lithuania, Belarus etc. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland. And I have been to Zalipie. A primitive small village of 700 people like that does not deserve recognition. It's like placing a separate section for Chernobyl tourism in Ukraine article. Completely pointless and unworthy.Oliszydlowski,
728
2017-09-04 22:01:11.000000 UTC
7989717330.1951672one sided edits.thanks a lot for stalking.stay to the sandboz.oxy cotin perdue pharma
729
2017-09-04 11:03:08.000000 UTC
7988852920.19509992This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of airlines of Latvia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (see for previous warning) Matthew_hk tc
730
2017-09-04 08:57:56.000000 UTC
7988722810.19506179Free Beacon is not a and should be removed. Somedifferentstuff (talk)
731
2017-09-04 21:59:31.000000 UTC
7989715390.19499522Dumping toxic waste What you wrote made remember a previous metaphor about dumping toxic waste which I think you made. Do you recall where that occurred? I might start building a new essay with that and another I have about civic participation. ☆ Bri (talk)
732
2017-09-04 02:00:17.000000 UTC
7988284570.19496621MOS:NOTUSA - September 2017 Despite last month's block, I see that you've returned to making edits that violate MOS:NOTUSA. You need to stop doing this. NewYorkActuary (talk)
733
2017-09-04 05:40:02.000000 UTC
7988517110.19482511Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Widr (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
734
2017-09-04 15:13:33.000000 UTC
7989145980.19482511Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Widr (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
735
2017-09-04 10:59:54.000000 UTC
7988849020.19477472You are going to have be a damn sight more specific than vague you did X. it comes across as if you are looking to try and make up stuff. State what the issue is don't just add blind vague templates. The posting on here helps no one with the issues claimed. You are just being nothing more that a fly-poster. If you have specifics, mention them. Don't just go you did a naughty. We are not six, this is a place for civil discourse, not ner ner ne ner nerr.Sport and politics (talk) ~
736
2017-09-04 19:21:14.000000 UTC
7989500070.1942919I'm not sure where I presented myself in a manner that was intended to deceive you. Willthacheerleader18 (talk)
737
2017-09-04 13:04:11.000000 UTC
7988983020.1942366I deleted an external link The external link contained the words " the homosexual agenda". The information from the external link can be used in the article. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk)
738
2017-09-04 11:41:49.000000 UTC
7988895230.19413596The Fox News source does support that the SPLC does not consider him an extremist. Darkness Shines (talk)
739
2017-09-04 17:39:06.000000 UTC
7989350050.19377892Your rationale is precisely understandable.And in that case, I would happily agree with you selectively striking the comments of the sockpuppeteers/ban-evaders (i.e TruthReigns) but not the comments of the sock-puppet(Adam4Math).Cheers:)Winged Blades of GodricOn leave
740
2017-09-04 12:18:24.000000 UTC
7988931610.19353226Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Red Lake shootings, you may be . Hayman30 (talk)
741
2017-09-04 00:09:33.000000 UTC
7988150980.19320098Clever demonstration of often-forgotten kant principle The "screaming peen" argument in support of Kant's notion that two halves can never become whole unless there's an incongruity, therefore perfection is noumenal.
742
2017-09-04 00:15:10.000000 UTC
7988156900.19310862The problem here is that your edits to that article are disruptive, please stop this. Shellwood (talk)
743
2017-09-04 19:59:26.000000 UTC
7989554710.19302318The Racism section is based on one source citing "social media users" complaining about bias. Again, there's really no evidence here for any of this (anyone can tweet anything, that isn't proof) and it doesn't meet the Wikipedia standards for reliable news source because it is an opinion/editorial piece being used to ascertain fact. (see here for more: hhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#News_organizations) And there aren't corroborating sources that this is a controversy. Would at the very least like to see if there was ever a response by any MSA or MSA National with regards to such accusations...
744
2017-09-04 15:16:57.000000 UTC
7989151280.19302037Gaines * There are several references to Gaines. This must be general Edmund Pendleton Gaines. He died in 1849 and has no connection I can see with the Civil War or slavery. deisenbe (talk)
745
2017-09-04 17:49:23.000000 UTC
7989364660.19282094Anonymous users from this IP address have been temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Acroterion (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
746
2017-09-04 13:52:27.000000 UTC
7989038840.19281696Vandalism I undid two major changes from an IP user (116.48.61.74) because they appeared to be vandalism and the reason for their change was to remove 'all the "Charistmatic Theology" nonsense'. If any other editor would like to add/edit this page to help with NPOV, please do so, but let's not just delete everything becuase you don't agree with it. Add your content, cite your good sources, and let's make it an even better article. DoctorG  (talk)
747
2017-09-04 01:34:00.000000 UTC
7988252300.19277835Chandigarh is an encyclopedia article, and not a travel brochure This article contains many peacock terms and dubious claims. Some of them are "world's perfect city", "2nd cleanest city", "beautiful city", "smoke-free city" and "happiest city".This article is not written from a neutral point of view.Simple-man-everyday (talk)
748
2017-09-04 16:45:03.000000 UTC
7989277350.19262306This is for the edit this that's why I am giving you a warning. Unless a user gives you permission you are not permitted to edit their userpage no matter the dispute that you both may perhaps be in. This doesn't even go if it is YOUR comment. ♠Dinah♠ 🎤
749
2017-09-04 18:47:59.000000 UTC
7989454070.19259705Sonofagunner, if you want to cite Pykhalov then you should at least add that he's a pro-Stalin activist and revisionist. It's alright to quote Jeffrey Burds, but in the article you are citing Burds also writes: "''Obviously, there are serious problems relying on Soviet and Russian sources to reconstruct any aspects of Chechen history. Russian depictions of the Chechen question are without exception heavily laden with a deep-seated antagonism towards the Chechens. (...) This elusive pursuit is further hampered by the fact that various Russian–Chechen or Soviet–Chechen wars over the past 200 years have virtually annihilated Chechen archives, libraries, and other resources, making it impossible to write a history of Chechnya without relying heavily on Russian sources.''" (page 283 footnote 55). Therefore, at least add that his findings are problematically entirely based on Russian sources, something which Burds admits to himself.I would also like to bring to your attention that adding three paragraphs on supposed Chechen-Nazi friendship is beyond the scope of what this article should be about. The article on the Armenian Genocide doesn't dedicate three paragraphs on how the Armenians were fifth collumnists for the Russians either. This is for good reasons: dubbing entire nations as fifth collumnists is the type of racism that has led to genocides in the first place. If you want to write more on Chechen-Nazi collaboration you can do that in Collaboration with the Axis Powers during World War II, Case Blue, History of Chechnya, Chechen–Russian conflict or any other relevant page. Machinarium (talk)
750
2017-09-04 15:14:48.000000 UTC
7989148130.19208026September 2017 This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Esbjerg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dammitkevin (talk)
751
2017-09-04 02:32:43.000000 UTC
7988321350.19203345This article Several years ago I came upon this article, allegedly about my pastor R. B. Thieme, Jr., and it was a slanderous, distorted mess. I worked for many months, against much opposition, to get the article where it accurately reflected something of what he was about. Bob Thieme was a wonderful, gracious man, a man of high genius who could've done anything in life, yet he chose to humble himself and serve God by studying and teaching the Bible to his congregation. So faithful was this man over the 55 years of his ministry that many grew in grace and knowledge of their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and led happy, fulfilled lives honoring to the Lord.After a few years unmolested, this article has now come under attack again, truthful sections deleted by Wikipedia editors, and slanderous sections once again supported. I've learned much in the intervening years from Bob Thieme's ministry, and I know that defending this article is an unwise use of the limited time I have. Wikipedia is the wrong forum for accurate information. If you want to know about this man, then seek his publications and recorded lessons, which were always free of charge from a very gracious and helpful staff.Darryl Roberson9/3/2017
752
2017-09-04 02:58:20.000000 UTC
7988350980.1919322Collective news coverage and references * RT: Assange: Constant US threats against N. Korea have put it on total war footingAnyone is welcome to add more. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 (talk)
753
2017-09-04 20:16:09.000000 UTC
7989579830.19160779Please let me briefly state a few things here. About 5 years back I came upon this article of my pastor, and it was a slanderous, distorted mess, put up by individuals highly antagonistic to RB Thieme. I worked for a few years against much opposition to get the article where it accurately stated what he was about. Now, several years later, it has come under attack again. The content I removed was only recently added, originating from a concerted press smear campaign against a political candidate the press did not like. The press allegations are false. I have little doubt about the motivation behind including this one paragraph which pays disproportionate attention to these defamatory remarks. At any rate, I've got better things to do with my life these days. If this content is what you like, then have it. Bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:B010:F30:894B:6F43:A51E:ECFB (talk • contribs) ::Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth and . There seem to be many sources who have unfavorable opinions of Thieme. Perhaps you should reexamine your view of him. BTW: Can you slander or libel the dead? Jim1138 (talk)
754
2017-09-04 00:54:39.000000 UTC
7988200710.19157268, really!? I vacation to Pensacola Beach every forth of July, Navarre is right next to it right? RainbowIsBestPony (talk)
755
2017-09-04 00:55:10.000000 UTC
7988201280.19157268, really!? I vacation to Pensacola Beach every forth of July, Navarre is right next to it right? RainbowIsBestPony (talk)
756
2017-09-04 07:55:47.000000 UTC
7988661510.19143596September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Cabayi/CSD log. ''Since you've blanked all the warnings and comments on your talk page and have made it pretty obvious that you have no interest in working collaboratively I've gone straight to a level 4 warning.'' Cabayi (talk)
757
2017-09-04 07:51:47.000000 UTC
7988657760.19135581A professional journalist, especially a WaPo reporter, might be surprised to find out on his own that he's attributed as the source of this juvenile agitprop. Moreover, Lozada calls out Bray for inciting violence. () Yet the passage in the lead may erroneously suggest to some readers that Lozada either did or likely would elegantly excuse this attack as the movement's "militant challenge to militant free speech" (albeit a militant challenge to militant free speech). I've advised him of the error (by email). Dervorguilla (talk)
758
2017-09-04 16:56:50.000000 UTC
7989292070.19113252''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aksar 2, you may be blocked from editing. Hummerrocket (talk)
759
2017-09-04 02:59:10.000000 UTC
7988351760.19101447Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Acroterion (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
760
2017-09-04 03:01:32.000000 UTC
7988354300.19101447Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Acroterion (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
761
2017-09-04 11:08:11.000000 UTC
7988858080.19097932It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. '''Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital''' look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland. And I have been to Zalipie. It does not deserve recognition. Oliszydlowski,
762
2017-09-04 21:03:20.000000 UTC
7989642500.19092372''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mahanadi, you may be blocked from editing. IdreamofJeanie (talk)
763
2017-09-04 22:16:31.000000 UTC
7989737370.19086514Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Harmonie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
764
2017-09-04 01:17:22.000000 UTC
7988230290.19067465"...it freaking HURTS to stare at the sun."Not if you ask U2: "''I'm not the only one / Staring at the sun / Who's hoping to go blind ...''" I was actually listening to that song as totality approached, and I was doing exactly that, albeit through goggles with dark green glass (No cheap paper ones for me, my son or my dad! Besides, we can save them for the 2024 eclipse, when we won't have to travel so far) Daniel Case (talk)
765
2017-09-04 09:28:21.000000 UTC
7988748550.19048463''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Discussion group, you may be blocked from editing. User:DewritechDewritech (talk)
766
2017-09-04 14:43:33.000000 UTC
7989103500.19018255September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gas mask, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
767
2017-09-04 21:30:54.000000 UTC
7989679610.1900828Sharpe's second wife According to this article, both Jane Gibbons and Teresa Moreno are Sharpe's second wife. Strange, isn't it? JoanFine (talk)
768
2017-09-04 15:07:22.000000 UTC
7989136130.19004408Yeah, i will not be UNCLE🎅 anymore 😅Thanx 4 the advice Pure conSouls TDLWH (talk)
769
2017-09-04 02:02:58.000000 UTC
7988288130.19004114A very sad day... Tryptofish made us aware of potentially sad news about DrChrissy. I have since confirmed it...RIP DrChrissy. It is with a heavy heart that I am signing off for now. Atsme📞📧
770
2017-09-04 03:26:00.000000 UTC
7988376970.18997604Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Timeline of the 2017 Venezuelan protests. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
771
2017-09-04 12:42:31.000000 UTC
7988958490.18985412Oliszydlowski, I'm taken aback by how you describe polish folk culture as "backwards". I'm also perplexed why you were so pushy in tying to insert images of Hanseatic cities into the article, or took out a paining by Matejko, or added a church that to moved from Norway (that has some Runic writing on it). If you think that other country articles don't include folk elements in it Please see Ukraine, Slovakia and Estonia (they inlude images of folk dress and/or building. Just to give a well deserved highlight to the traditional culture. E-960 (talk)
772
2017-09-04 19:00:33.000000 UTC
7989470900.18937641Well how do I get this slander to be removed? I am clearly not alt-right. Do I tweet her with my random twitter account that I use only for viewing (I have 0 tweets on it)?
773
2017-09-04 19:39:29.000000 UTC
7989528830.1893409Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Ronhjones  (Talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
774
2017-09-04 17:24:55.000000 UTC
7989331640.1892857Removed since it was unsourced and you challenged its validity. EvergreenFir (talk)
775
2017-09-04 12:44:16.000000 UTC
7988960430.18882732The End.All that remains of Laura Palmer's life is a legacy of darkness and death. Lynch himself had already revealed the ending to us year ago when he stated that Twin Peaks was about "the loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion and devastation of the victim of incest.” While the first two seasons focused on the victimization by her father Leland; the Return is about the enabling and denial of her mother Sarah. The House truly represents only one thing Incest and Lynch's narrative's shows us that as much as we all want to see Laura, the cast and the audience heal from this nightmare, the real pain of Twin Peaks will never go away the stigma of incest is permanent. After much thought on this, I wonder if one day we will learn that David Lynch himself was a victim of incest and that this was his way through Transcendental Meditation as an attempt to erase his own pain, and that he finally learned the damage is permanent. This show is not about sacred love, it is about profane love, the forbidden kind. I recommend that a section about this be established as part of the legacy of Seasons 1, 2, and 3. All that remains of Twin Peaks is the legacy of America - thousands of stories with different endings, some good and some evil. Has America moved beyond these distinctions into a new realm? I am convinced Twin Peaks has ended for good, and for that I am relieved.
776
2017-09-04 17:15:19.000000 UTC
7989318370.18871927Excellent suggestions. It is coincidence that I was speaking to a woman today organizing an edit-a-thon for notable women of color in the Pittsburgh area and racism in medicine is the first thing that came to my mind. Do you remember the study where black men in the south went untreated for syphilis? That would be one example. But I have to find that article first. Send any refs my way. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉
777
2017-09-04 14:57:48.000000 UTC
7989122190.18869369No worries, I saw your notice on your talk page. Take care and look after yourself. We'll look after this place, and try not to get TRM blocked until you're back around again! Harrias talk
778
2017-09-04 04:35:28.000000 UTC
7988449740.18856367You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ned Kelly. Melonkelon (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
779
2017-09-04 17:38:33.000000 UTC
7989349330.18851173Thanks for replying! Quick note on the logistics of discussing things on Talk pages, which are essential for everything that happens here. In Talk page discussions, we "thread" comments by indenting - when you reply to someone, you put a colon in front of your comment, and the Wikipedia software converts that into an indent or tab when you save your edit; if the other person has indented once, then you indent twice by putting two colons which the WP software converts into two indents, and when that gets ridiculous you reset back to the margin (or "outdent") by putting this in front of your comment. This also allows you to make it clear if you are also responding to something that someone else responded to if there are more than two people in the discussion; in that case you would indent the same amount as the person just above you in the thread. ::I did that above - I added one colon in front of your comment, and did it here there are two colons in front of this reply.:: Also at the end of the comment, please "sign" by typing exactly four (not 3 or 5) tildas "" which the WP software converts into a date stamp and links to your talk and user pages when you save your edit. That is how we know who said what. I know this is insanely archaic and unwieldy, but this is the software environment we have to work on. Sorry about that. Will reply on the substance in a second... Jytdog (talk)
780
2017-09-04 14:34:18.000000 UTC
7989090440.18849641i hope i can back to editing, i wanna make new articles, i did nothing, i have no sockpuppet. i just want editing and share, User:Morganfitzp also helping me. ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk)
781
2017-09-04 17:41:20.000000 UTC
7989352830.18841231Trying to get this to GA status Hi all, going through a bunch of edits on this today and so if I seem excessive with the meta-queries, instead of freaking out, perhaps answer the question that seems superfluous to you? I copyedit for a living, so please give me some space to do it. Thanks!!A21sauce (talk)
782
2017-09-04 07:35:01.000000 UTC
7988642450.18840651Please delete the wiki_biography. I have already requested to delete or speedy delete that account. I will use Varshilmehta1991.
783
2017-09-04 20:02:59.000000 UTC
7989560090.18838106You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of theatre personnel. Shellwood (talk)
784
2017-09-04 22:09:07.000000 UTC
7989726870.18823054= ''Bunk'd'' =Amaury, do you know if there is any truth to this edit? If that's even halfway accurate, that is a heck of a lot of "cast churn" for one of these Disney/Nick shows – maybe more "cast churn" than I've ever seen... And it would be even stranger if they all that, and didn't add Cameron Boyce at the same time... IJBall (contribs • talk)
785
2017-09-04 01:29:46.000000 UTC
7988246600.18820484I disagreeHolland85 (talk) .
786
2017-09-04 06:04:42.000000 UTC
7988544230.18808632Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cody Ware. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zappa⚡Mati
787
2017-09-04 01:17:59.000000 UTC
7988231440.18803875No problem I am a Stalker after all ^-^. Also I found a possible sock and I have no idea how to deal with them... ♠Dinah♠ 🎤
788
2017-09-04 01:20:13.000000 UTC
7988234290.18776034Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . GABgab : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
789
2017-09-04 20:25:25.000000 UTC
7989592440.18764454Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Representative assembly, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
790
2017-09-04 04:45:02.000000 UTC
7988460120.187306TFA Thank you for what you did for the Witch of Pungo, whose good name Grace Sherwood was restored after 300 years OTD. Gerda Arendt (talk)
791
2017-09-04 12:41:13.000000 UTC
7988957010.18688792The idea that you would dispute objective biographical information and entirely neutral facts that come directly from the subject is unsettling at best. It suggests you are more interested in maintaining control over the page rather than ensuring it is as objective and accurate as possible. I have no connection to the Facebook page as it is not a Facebook page, it is a video, which I have no connection to. It seems you are either too myopic or lacking the ability to comprehend the rules and regulations you yourself cite.
792
2017-09-04 18:40:09.000000 UTC
7989443450.18664049Please let us know what we need to do for this Keyar.srinivasan (talk)
793
2017-09-04 20:19:55.000000 UTC
7989584910.18652718Reporting Sock Hi PFH, sorry you got caught up in a filter preventing you from reporting that sock earlier today. I've tweaked it so you won't be stopped in future, here or on your IP. That IP got blocked so all is good for now. Thanks for the vigilance! CrowCaw
794
2017-09-04 14:50:14.000000 UTC
7989112440.18629396You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Mean as custard (talk)
795
2017-09-04 14:38:00.000000 UTC
7989095440.18620792''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Davide Zappacosta, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk)
796
2017-09-04 16:52:48.000000 UTC
7989287220.186157Please stop going to articles to change things out of personal preference, these articles was just fine how they are, changing Wikipedia pages solely to suit your personal preference is disruptive and you not responding is making things worse, if you continue to doing these unnecessary edits without explaining why, you be blocked from Wikipedia. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk)
797
2017-09-04 04:32:57.000000 UTC
7988446720.18587859Persistent sockpuppets As we can see all the edits on MCC and all those page creations. I am thinking of collecting as many accounts as possible and report them all to, but I think we should also report to admin's noticeboard/incidents or so. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
798
2017-09-04 21:34:06.000000 UTC
7989683950.18580927''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Papoose (rapper). Flyer22 Reborn (talk)
799
2017-09-04 17:17:54.000000 UTC
7989322000.18562134People became quiet because we were sick of discussing it, because you kept bringing up the same points over and over, because you kept making accusations of bias and prejudice; not because we saw your great wisdom and were forced to concede to your airtight logic. You keep saying you're trying to arrive at a consensus, but there already is a consensus. Read for some detail on why. You should also read in case you feel like pushing your luck. Deacon Vorbis (talk)
800
2017-09-04 20:10:35.000000 UTC
7989572350.18560655Please stick around. I speak for many others when I say that I appreciate having you here. GABgab
801
2017-09-04 05:42:03.000000 UTC
7988519230.18553104Season 2 synopsis According to CBR, it is: "Just when Matt thinks he is bringing order back to the city, new forces are rising in Hell’s Kitchen. Now the Man Without Fear must take on a new adversary in Frank Castle and face an old flame – Elektra Natchios. Bigger problems emerge when Frank Castle, a man looking for vengeance, is reborn as The Punisher, a man who takes justice into his own hands in Matt’s neighborhood. Meanwhile, Matt must balance his duty to his community as a lawyer and his dangerous life as the Devil of Hell’s Kitchen, facing a life-altering choice that forces him to truly understand what it means to be a hero." The experienced may update the article. Kailash29792 (talk)
802
2017-09-04 09:21:56.000000 UTC
7988742700.18544309I have not been particularly impressed with some of 's approaches to editing, such as on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candice Hutchings. Now, with that out of the way, Cavecanem101 - knock it off. Nobody is adding the tags because they're feeling malicious or bullying, they just want to alert the wider community that the article needs attention (which it does) and should be looked at with a view to improvement. It's nothing personal. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)
803
2017-09-04 08:51:49.000000 UTC
7988717700.18542752=War crimesChurch statementsFerenghiOther personalities of the warEnd of Italian East Africa=
804
2017-09-04 21:15:18.000000 UTC
7989658700.18503088I'm not quite happy with it either. The problem being that in German, the word Toast(brot) refers specifically to one particular style and size of bread, whether it is actually toasted or not, so the clarification that it is not toasted is necessary in German (and "untoasted toast" sounds a little silly). In English, virtually any style of bread that is toasted or roasted may be referred to as toast. So we have a potential source of confusion here. German Toast (or Toastbrot) is similar to american-style sandwich slices, only smaller. Maybe replace the word "toast" with "sandwich slice" for unambiguity's sake? The only differences are the size of the slices, and Toastbrot is typically a little less dense. Stizzleswick (talk)
805
2017-09-04 18:25:28.000000 UTC
7989422500.18503088I'm not quite happy with it either. The problem being that in German, the word Toast(brot) refers specifically to one particular style and size of bread, whether it is actually toasted or not, so the clarification that it is not toasted is necessary in German (and "untoasted toast" sounds a little silly). In English, virtually any style of bread that is toasted or roasted may be referred to as toast. So we have a potential source of confusion here. German Toast (or Toastbrot) is similar to american-style sandwich slices, only smaller. Maybe replace the word "toast" with "sandwich slice" for unambiguity's sake? The only differences are the size of the slices, and Toastbrot is typically a little less dense. Stizzleswick (talk)
806
2017-09-04 13:13:02.000000 UTC
7988993540.18488127You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Board examination. Shellwood (talk)
807
2017-09-04 19:15:29.000000 UTC
7989491060.18477981You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 8). Sjö (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
808
2017-09-04 20:07:50.000000 UTC
7989568510.18470533''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Linvoy Primus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk)
809
2017-09-04 03:14:35.000000 UTC
7988366270.18464601Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to CSI: Miami (season 9). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
810
2017-09-04 10:50:04.000000 UTC
7988837400.1837754type = noticestyle = margin: 4px 0;text = NEW USERS AND IP EDITORS: If I have inadvertently reverted your good faith edits and warned you regarding vandalism or similar, please do not take offense. Leave me a note in a new section on this page and, upon review, I will revert my own edits and remove the warnings. This is preferable to you simply undoing my reverts, where I am less likely to recognize that you are undoing them in good faith. Lastly, please maintain civility while conversing. Problems are best settled keeping a cool head.image = style = background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 4px 0; border: 1px solid #181818text = Feel free to drop a message here, be it seeking help, pointing out an error in my edit, or just casual chatting related to Wikipedia. [ Click here to start a new talk topic.]
811
2017-09-04 18:23:34.000000 UTC
7989419750.18370785I'm not quite happy with it either. The problem being that in German, the word Toast(brot) refers specifically to one particular style and size of bread, whether it is actually toasted or not, so the clarification that it is not toasted is necessary in German (and "untoasted toast" sounds a little silly). In English, virtually any style of bread that is toasted or roasted may be referred to as toast. So we have a potential source of confusion here. German Toast (or Toastbrot) is similar to american-style sandwich slices, only smaller. Maybe replace the word "toast" with "sandwich slice" for unambiguity's sake? The only differences are that the size of the slices, and Toastbrot is typically a little less dense. Stizzleswick (talk)
812
2017-09-04 20:20:20.000000 UTC
7989585540.18363802Hi PFH, sorry you got caught up in a filter preventing you from reporting that sock earlier today. I've tweaked it so you won't be stopped in future, here or on your IP. That IP you were reporting got blocked so all is good for now. Thanks for the vigilance! CrowCaw
813
2017-09-04 11:06:37.000000 UTC
7988856500.18362781It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland Oliszydlowski,
814
2017-09-04 04:06:44.000000 UTC
7988421410.18332803Haugen fightThis section claims that Haugen was "wrong on both counts." No evidence is given. How do we know that the fighters that Chavez beat were not Tijuana taxi-drivers and that Haugen's mother couldn't beat them? Also, how do we know that everyone in Azteca Stadium that night was Mexican? 47.137.183.192 (talk)
815
2017-09-04 10:58:44.000000 UTC
7988847510.18288362It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture of eastern Poland. Oliszydlowski,
816
2017-09-04 05:03:29.000000 UTC
7988478330.18287668AOK Life salt Mike the article AOK Life has been created and deleted three times in the last week, with two of those instances being minutes apart. Could you throw down a week's worth of salt?SamHolt6 (talk)
817
2017-09-04 22:09:28.000000 UTC
7989727250.18277532Amaury, do you know if there is any truth to this edit? If that's even halfway accurate, that is a heck of a lot of "cast churn" for one of these Disney/Nick shows – maybe more "cast churn" than I've ever seen... And it would be even stranger if they did all that, and didn't add Cameron Boyce at the same time... IJBall (contribs • talk)
818
2017-09-04 16:58:33.000000 UTC
7989294300.18258278''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Norway, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hummerrocket (talk)
819
2017-09-04 16:29:16.000000 UTC
7989255850.18212152I guess it comes down to whether or not it's relevant, otherwise can be immediately applied. I think you should steer clear of AN/I contentious discussions for a while, I've been trying to do the same too. Can you do that for me? Anyway, I am not familiar with GamerGate also, other than one of the sanctioned editor was responsible for my block log (interesting fact of the day, lol). Here's another distraction read for you if you haven't read it already. Alex ShihTalk
820
2017-09-04 05:17:47.000000 UTC
7988493450.18210459Wrote a response to your recent undo of my changes to "vacuous truth" article. I think your undo was a bad decision. I added a section to the vacuous truth article's talk page ([[Talk:Vacuous_truth#Article_quality_has_become_poor._Has_inconsistencies_and_also_needs_explanation_of_why_vacuous_truth_exists.|link]]), entitled "Article quality has become poor. Has inconsistencies and also needs explanation of why vacuous truth exists.".It seems to me that if this is how the editing culture is on Wikipedia then I should probably spend my time elsewhere, somewhere with a more reasonable culture. My time is valuable, and I shouldn't have to argue over even the most basic and obviously useful changes.MagneticInk (talk)
821
2017-09-04 20:12:04.000000 UTC
7989574500.18176015Kayus Kayode8729 (talk)
822
2017-09-04 08:00:03.000000 UTC
7988665240.18161756UTRSBot (talk)
823
2017-09-04 00:59:02.000000 UTC
7988205850.18161756UTRSBot (talk)
824
2017-09-04 13:30:04.000000 UTC
7989012340.18161751UTRSBot (talk)
825
2017-09-04 09:55:28.000000 UTC
7988777630.18161751UTRSBot (talk)
826
2017-09-04 08:26:04.000000 UTC
7988696070.18161751Mihaibarboi (talk)
827
2017-09-04 08:00:04.000000 UTC
7988665250.18161751UTRSBot (talk)
828
2017-09-04 06:54:42.000000 UTC
7988608220.18161751UTRSBot (talk)
829
2017-09-04 14:39:26.000000 UTC
7989097810.18161751UTRSBot (talk)
830
2017-09-04 15:30:04.000000 UTC
7989172810.18161751UTRSBot (talk)
831
2017-09-04 23:51:39.000000 UTC
7989839990.18161751PeterMan844 (talk)
832
2017-09-04 03:30:03.000000 UTC
7988381640.18161751UTRSBot (talk)
833
2017-09-04 18:09:22.000000 UTC
7989397280.18161751UTRSBot (talk)
834
2017-09-04 22:19:08.000000 UTC
7989740630.1813786''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. –72 (talk)
835
2017-09-04 10:30:54.000000 UTC
7988815910.18133408You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Dammitkevin (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
836
2017-09-04 09:39:36.000000 UTC
7988759710.18123594Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mustafa Barzani, you may be . Shellwood (talk)
837
2017-09-04 05:44:31.000000 UTC
7988521560.18120159Cool story j3w. 2604:2000:814B:B300:7403:898A:5AD:A981 (talk)
838
2017-09-04 21:10:43.000000 UTC
7989652230.18100233If A7 doesn't apply ... ... to software, viz, Firka (software)‎ what does? Thanks. -Roxy the dog. bark
839
2017-09-04 21:06:05.000000 UTC
7989646230.18094699You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Acroterion (talk)
840
2017-09-04 13:23:41.000000 UTC
7989005450.18093625Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tessellation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
841
2017-09-04 03:14:55.000000 UTC
7988366580.18084288Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nalsar University of Law. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
842
2017-09-04 17:43:36.000000 UTC
7989356310.18078458The Don't ask, don't tell page is about more than just a single memorandum, though. This page is already itself a split from Sexual orientation and gender identity in the United States military; I don't see that there's enough material to justify a further split at this time. Funcrunch (talk)
843
2017-09-04 12:10:13.000000 UTC
7988923200.1807661Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Subsurface flow. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
844
2017-09-04 22:15:38.000000 UTC
7989736370.18068722Ed, Edd & Eddy vandal Geraldo, the Ed, Edd & Eddy vandal is back, and is active at List of American television programs‎, at least. Just so you know. IJBall (contribs • talk)
845
2017-09-04 20:25:17.000000 UTC
7989592300.18056427Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Calico cat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
846
2017-09-04 15:11:21.000000 UTC
7989142120.18051544September 2017 Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Classless society— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses  @
847
2017-09-04 15:36:39.000000 UTC
7989182650.18044862''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Lizzie McGuire episodes, you may be blocked from editing. MPFitz1968 (talk)
848
2017-09-04 01:45:35.000000 UTC
7988269730.18024151=Pakistan=For information on Pakistani cities, see “TABLE - 1: PROVISIONAL PROVINCE WISE POPULATION BY SEX AND RURAL/URBAN”; Pakistan just released the results of its 2017 census. Karachi Division (which I think should be called the “city proper”), Sindh is listed as having 16,051,521 people. Lahore District (again, I suppose we can consider it to be the “city proper”), Lahore Division, Punjab, has 11,126,285 people. Faisalabad District, Faisalabad Division, Punjab, has 7,873,910 people; but I am not sure the entire district, with an area of 5,936.76 km2, should be considered a “city proper”; is it dense enuf? Peshawar District, Peshawar Division, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa}Khyber, has 4,269,079 people (on 1,517.5 km2); I'd count that as a city proper.This article needs alot of cleaning up; fixing the situation regarding Pakistani cities is just a start.Solomonfromfinland (talk)
849
2017-09-04 18:52:28.000000 UTC
7989459940.180222Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tahira Mazhar Ali, you may be . KGirl (Wanna chat?)
850
2017-09-04 15:18:05.000000 UTC
7989153080.18002445Jake Paul. I tried adding him, because I think what he did is important, but it wouldn't really let me. What do you guys think? Tybomb124 (talk)
851
2017-09-04 23:16:08.000000 UTC
7989802170.17997746I haven't seen whatever Drmies responded to. I really don't know how telling people you were once blocked for ████████████ (and I didn't even do that except in response to a question) can possibly be outing something as you say that yourself. I don't mention any personal information. I don't know what you think I know, but I don't know it. I have looked up up off-wiki, but what I found, didn't even mention your block; it was all recent stuff. There's nothing I don't know, that you haven't put out there yourself, and could have been oversighted years ago. Of course I'll try and avoid outing you ... but not knowing how I outed you, it is difficult - though I don't tend to discuss you. And given that I haven't done anything even remotely sneaky to get information, there's likely something out there in Wikispace that should be oversighted, if this is a real issue.I strongly support and endorse the policy (and it's also in my own best interest - with a quarter-century online presence, I'm hardly difficult to out - I think there's text somewhere from me dissing Wikipedia in one of the Nupedia discussions in the 1990s ... oh wait, those dates don't work. Hmm, was there an earlier project ... this would have been more mid-1990s. But I digress )
852
2017-09-04 23:14:25.000000 UTC
7989800390.17997746I haven't seen whatever Drmies responded to. I really don't know how telling people you were once blocked for ████████████ (and I didn't even do that except in response to a question) can possibly be outing something as you say that yourself. I don't mention any personal information. I don't know what you think I know, but I don't know it. I have looked up up off-wiki, but what I found, didn't even mention your block; it was all recent stuff. There's nothing I don't know, that you haven't put out there yourself, and could have been oversighted years ago. Of course I'll try and avoid outing you ... but not knowing how I outed you, it is difficult - though I don't tend to discuss you. And given that I haven't done anything even remotely sneaky to get information, there's likely something out there in Wikispace that should be oversighted, if this is a real issue. I strongly support and endorse the policy (and it's also in my own best interest - with a quarter-century online presence, I'm hardly difficult to out - I think there's text somewhere from me dissing Wikipedia in one of the Nupedia discussions in the 1990s ... oh wait, those dates don't work. Hmm, was there an earlier project ... this would have been more mid-1990s. But I digress )
853
2017-09-04 23:59:03.000000 UTC
7989848720.17988034''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [trigger the edit filter], you may be blocked from editing. —MRD2014 Talk • Edits • 
854
2017-09-04 14:07:29.000000 UTC
7989057160.17982881"However, it could be awkward for Moses to go to the Israelites and Pharaoh and say, “I am has sent me.” So, in Ex. 3:15 God revises this phrase and changes it to the third person by saying, “Tell them that ‘He is’ has sent you.”" Is copyrighted text. Like I said, you copypasted everything directly from the source. Darkness Shines (talk)
855
2017-09-04 02:34:26.000000 UTC
7988323380.1797776You may be from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zoo.Your edits have been automatically marked as and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Zoo was changed by 103.36.5.189 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854415 on 2017-09-04T02:34:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk)
856
2017-09-04 23:53:38.000000 UTC
7989842210.179646Unclear which german camps used larger permanent gas chambers Was going to look up where the nazi high capacity industrial gas chambers were and noticed the second paragraph under 'Gas chambers' is quite vague. "The Nazi concentration and extermination camps, including Auschwitz and Majdanek, used hydrogen cyanide in the form of Zyklon B." List all known camps and avoid weasel-ish words instead of saying "including Auschwitz and Majdanek" maybe?I think the confusion is partially caused by semantics, as the nazis utilized smaller chambers reminiscent of U.S. execution chambers for what they called 'euthanasia', as well as improvised short term solutions often with carbon monoxide, and finally, what of course the general public associates with "nazi gas chambers", ergo the type the public knows well from Birkenau. Despite the fact that it is technically correct to refer to all these just as "gas chambers", it leads to great confusion for anyone trying to get an answer to the question "which camps utilized repeat use specified gas chambers capable of sustained use for said purpose". In my opinion the whole section should be rewritten to reflect on the distinction between the different types used, and in which context they were used, so as to not confuse the T4 Hadamar chambers with the makeshift carbon monoxide chambers or the Birkenau cyklon B chambers. AFAIK the latter were structured as delousing chambers, but this should not detract from the fact that they are distinguishable to the public from make-shift operations as well as the low capacity 'euthanasia' chambers and thus it is of interest to specify exactly which camps utilized this method, and it shouldn't take up too much additional space.85.194.2.57 (talk)
857
2017-09-04 11:36:31.000000 UTC
7988889630.17962185Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Starships (song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
858
2017-09-04 00:14:47.000000 UTC
7988156460.17962049Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:PlyrStar93. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sir Sputnik (talk)
859
2017-09-04 17:31:46.000000 UTC
7989340370.17939354Short Washington Times piece on federal prison population This sentence was put at the start of the 'illegal immigration and crime' section: "Illegal immigrants make up 22% of inmates in the federal prison population." It's problematic for a number of reasons:* 1) The story says that these numbers are both unauthorized and legal immigrants.* 2) Wash Times is not a RS.* 3) I find no reporting on this in reliable news outlets.* 4) There is absolutely no context provided about the figures. Are they in federal prisons for immigration-related offenses? Are immigrants overrepresented in federal prisons because federal law enforcement prioritizes violations of immigration law? This is why we use reliable sources: because they generally provide the appropriate context rather than incomplete and misleading numbers.* 5) Even if the figures were correct, they should not be put at the front of the 'illegal immigration and crime' section, given that the figures provide very little information about the relationship between illegal immigration and crime (the only thing the figure suggest is that the law enforcement arm, which has immigration enforcement as one of its few major law enforcement tasks, does a lot of immigration enforcement), yet will mislead lots of readers into thinking the numbers do reflect on the relationship between illegal immigration and crime. Snooganssnoogans (talk)
860
2017-09-04 04:39:20.000000 UTC
7988454920.17937586I think the agricultural system in Michael okpara university of agriculture is primitive and should be looked into
861
2017-09-04 09:03:59.000000 UTC
7988727540.17923358Antifa (United States) This is actually the reason I noted you. You wrote "In September 2017, the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security officially classified Antifa activities as "Domestic terrorist violence". using this as a source. It doesn't say that. It says "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has formally classified the activities of anti-fascist groups (antifa) as “domestic terrorist violence” since early 2016, according to confidential law enforcement documents obtained by Politico and interviews." "According to" and "2016". There has been no official statement. You also used the Daily Mail as a source. There the issue isn't just that it isn't a reliable source, but that it is a source that the English Wikipedia community has decided should not be used, a decision which got a lot of publicity. Please don't use it again, as that wasn't just a recommendation or a guideline that might sometimes be ignored. Doug Weller talk
862
2017-09-04 06:01:05.000000 UTC
7988538690.17915805What is Antifa redux? Just read this. Interesting read, I'll just add a bit here:"Antifa is actually more label than organization, its believers connected by calls to action on websites like It’s Going Down. Anarchist, communist or just liberal, they oppose fascism with militant zeal. But some formalize into affinity groups like the Pastel Bloc; dressed in pastels — a play on the head-to-toe uniform of black bloc — they offer medical attention during protests.Black bloc is often seen as mostly white males looking to wreak havoc for their cause. A half-dozen Berkeley antifa members who agreed to speak on record to us saw merit in that stereotype, but since the Trump inauguration, they said, those behind the masks represent the spectrum of gender and race. “People showing up to the protests are the ones with the most to lose,” said Neil Lawrence, a Berkeley student. Part of his decision to go public as a transgender anti-fascist is to counteract the stereotype."Doug Weller talk
863
2017-09-04 03:38:17.000000 UTC
7988391160.17906155Coach Trip! Hi! I noticed you made an edit to Coach Trip (series 16) and have reverted it. I understand this edit was originally made by a sockpuppet! However as it was constructive! I edited it! ThanksRealitytelevisionn (talk)
864
2017-09-04 07:01:48.000000 UTC
7988614440.17888828Mexico considers him of Mexican nationality regardless of where he was born because his father was born in Mexico. Conversely, the United States considers him an American citizen because he was born in the United States. He's as Mexican American as a person can be, though for stylistic purposes the hyphen really should be deleted.Unklscrufy (talk)
865
2017-09-04 03:34:21.000000 UTC
7988386270.17882171The opinions of Jimmy Dore for your consideration:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWYPmHJ3WeU** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx6Z_BAGPqw – wbm1058 (talk)
866
2017-09-04 21:14:27.000000 UTC
7989657500.17845403currentstatus=FL|maindate=25 September 2017}}
867
2017-09-04 06:13:29.000000 UTC
7988557030.17840578When is a rump state not a rump state? When reliable sources don't call it such I've removed all of the 20th century instances of supposed rump states because in no instance did a call it that. We cannot simply point to a map and call it such; as editors, we are not citable as sources. Before I go through the rest of the article's sources more carefully, I want to make sure that every other contributor here understand that if we don't have a RS indisputably calling such and such a rump state, we cannot include it. Its that simple. - Jack Sebastian (talk)
868
2017-09-04 15:01:53.000000 UTC
7989127930.17825012'Sumiko Asai (Yoko Umemura) is the owner of the Asai Drug Company.' This sentence in the article is incorrect. Sumiko Asai, portrayed by the actress Yoko Umemura, is the wife of Sonosuke Asai, portrayed by Benkai Shiganoya. In fact, Sonosuke Asai is the owner of the drug company. 76.16.93.184 (talk)
869
2017-09-04 09:21:04.000000 UTC
7988741910.17794758Gabucho181 Dan Vs. not confirmed for Season 4 for Cartoon Network. Sockpuppet of Gabucho181. 185.79.100.118 (talk)
870
2017-09-04 09:40:41.000000 UTC
7988760940.17794758Gabucho181 Dan Vs. not confirmed for Season 4 for Cartoon Network. Sockpuppet of Gabucho181. 185.79.100.118 (talk)
871
2017-09-04 16:55:07.000000 UTC
7989289930.17793223I just found the list really long. Why Lincoln? He is universally regarded as a great leader, is this because he was President during the Civil War? Anyway I'm not hung up about it. Legacypac (talk)
872
2017-09-04 20:36:36.000000 UTC
7989607310.17793043You are a fast writer, but just a normal thinker. Don't accuse others. 93.219.167.128 (talk)
873
2017-09-04 14:17:16.000000 UTC
7989068630.17771052The Herberman and Cuomo articles were paid work, the Cavalier work was not. /blI will review your processes to better follow them in the future./bNoted.
874
2017-09-04 11:13:41.000000 UTC
7988864950.17764488It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. '''Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital''' look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland. And I have been to Zalipie. A primitive village like that does not deserve recognition. It's like placing a separate section for tourism in Chernobyl in Ukraine article.Oliszydlowski,
875
2017-09-04 11:13:19.000000 UTC
7988864540.17764488It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. '''Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital''' look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland. And I have been to Zalipie. A primitive village like that does not deserve recognition. It's like placing a separate section for tourism in Chernobyl in Ukraine article.Oliszydlowski,
876
2017-09-04 19:12:12.000000 UTC
7989486400.17763035September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at National Institute of Technology Sikkim. ''I warned you numerous times about editing National Institute of Technology Sikkim to which you have a as a student. If you don't stop editing it, you will be blocked.'' Muhandes (talk)
877
2017-09-04 09:03:09.000000 UTC
7988726930.17738822nihlus kryikyou arrived just now... and did not read all the history.It's not me that begin but is Rentier that is doing a personal war on me.I'm asking many times to discuss, prove his affirmations, make real editings...NOTHING.Now... i understand that you are his friend... he ask to help him...No problem...I will see also YOUR editing to see if also you are payed.Cavecanem101 (talk)
878
2017-09-04 09:45:01.000000 UTC
7988765970.17732067September 2017 your edits about soil in fecal sludgeYou have added in several articles that fecal sludge contains soil (without a reference). This is not true when the fecal sludge comes from septic tanks; when it comes from pit latrines it could contain a little bit of soil but not significant. I have reverted a second time your edit to water pollution about dredging and bokashi. Please don't add it again before discussing it first on the talk page of the article. Otherwise it would become and edit war. See also the comment that you received in May 2017 on your talk page. If you feel strongly about dredging and bokashi then please take it to the alk page of water pollution and we can discuss it further there. EMsmile (talk)
879
2017-09-04 21:43:04.000000 UTC
7989696500.17726558You may be right about this, but I'm not asking why the evidence was not disclosed; I'm asking whether we can include legitimate criticism of this non-disclosure and Iraq-style rhetoric towards Russia. Again, I don't see how Bershidsky and Shane are worse than, say, Andrei Soldatov. S. Roix (talk)
880
2017-09-04 19:32:20.000000 UTC
7989516990.1772246September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Powerpuff Girls (2016 TV series). Same behavior as before EvergreenFir (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
881
2017-09-04 11:15:08.000000 UTC
7988866380.17707166It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. '''Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital''' look at Germany, France or even Russia. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland. And I have been to Zalipie. A primitive village like that does not deserve recognition. It's like placing a separate section for Chernobyl tourism in Ukraine article.Oliszydlowski,
882
2017-09-04 17:14:46.000000 UTC
7989317380.17678042Striking.. Hi, Kautilya,I have reverted your edit at Talk:2017 China–India border standoff which strike-throughed certain comments in certain t/p discussions. We don't normally strike out comments of banned/blocked users without any other solid reason.This is only allowed at XFDs/RfCs/RMs et al to prevent blocked sock-puppets/ban-evaders from biasing a consensus.Regards:)Winged Blades of GodricOn leave
883
2017-09-04 21:17:17.000000 UTC
7989661560.176762542. Quicksand - Britney Spears (Album "Circus", 2008) [+ Backing vocals for the track.]4. Murder My Heart - Michael Bolton (Album "One World One Love", 2009) [+ Backing vocals for the track.]
884
2017-09-04 02:27:23.000000 UTC
7988315550.17614096You may be from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black Saturday.Your edits have been automatically marked as and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Black Saturday was changed by 110.145.160.158 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916105 on 2017-09-04T02:27:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk)
885
2017-09-04 15:49:40.000000 UTC
7989201250.17603284This is not vandalizing, I am a historian with multiple degrees. I am neither Greek, nor Macedonian, but French-American, and I don't appreciate Wikipedia not being factual.
886
2017-09-04 14:19:37.000000 UTC
7989071520.17602473Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Master Chief. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk)
887
2017-09-04 15:10:08.000000 UTC
7989140160.17601554Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I dream of horses  @
888
2017-09-04 20:47:48.000000 UTC
7989622490.17601386Anarchism in the United States So, are you going to explain what you think is given undue weight, or are editors and readers supposed to guess? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk
889
2017-09-04 11:51:44.000000 UTC
7988905230.17593035Women in RedWell worth a look: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red. scope_creep (talk)
890
2017-09-04 08:12:40.000000 UTC
7988684340.17552489If the magazine is notable, someone else will write about it. I hope you understand that, in order to keep Wikipedia from becoming a free PR-tool, we need to be strict when it comes to conflicts of interest and notability guidelines. You have no idea how many articles get dumped here by smart-alecs trying to improve their company's web-presence. Kleuske (talk)
891
2017-09-04 22:24:03.000000 UTC
7989746170.17548424Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Teachers' Days. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
892
2017-09-04 17:32:00.000000 UTC
7989340730.17547664Oops, never mind. Too late. MelanieN (talk)
893
2017-09-04 07:16:29.000000 UTC
7988626660.17537162Free Soil PartyThe Free Soil Party was highly opposed to slavery, but saying that its ideology was "anti-slavery" without further qualification or explanation would give readers the idea that it was an abolitionist party, which it wasn't... AnonMoos (talk)
894
2017-09-04 16:21:51.000000 UTC
7989245150.1753154Your nomination of Head Up High (Oh Land song)The article Head Up High (Oh Land song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Head Up High (Oh Land song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak Cartoon network freak (talk)
895
2017-09-04 06:21:46.000000 UTC
7988570300.17531331Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.* If you would like to experiment, please use the . Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and have the ability to users from editing if they repeatedly engage in .* ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.*If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.* The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Harry Potter and the Cursed Child was changed by 122.173.67.208 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861066 on 2017-09-04T06:21:42+00:00 .Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk)
896
2017-09-04 09:47:35.000000 UTC
7988768870.17498188Authorization to make small edits for grammar correction Please could a steward give me permission to edit trivial grammatical errors.MickeyDangerez (talk)
897
2017-09-04 12:48:00.000000 UTC
7988964940.17491943From "1 inch flassid" to your recent accusations, BLP violations, citations of unreliable sources, and forum posts, it's pretty clear you're here to push an attempt at an agenda. Drmies (talk)
898
2017-09-04 06:58:31.000000 UTC
7988611530.17462364And one more thing, after checking this matter, if you feel appropriate, then please report him/her to be blocked. I'm using my phone to access wikipedia and don't know how to report someone. Pure conSouls (talk)
899
2017-09-04 04:18:11.000000 UTC
7988432380.1745962Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 September 2017 18 August Turku Finland. Moroccan knife fielding 2 dead 8 injured 114.109.74.13 (talk)
900
2017-09-04 13:07:12.000000 UTC
7988986490.17457597Both fission and fusion bombs are thermonuclear The entire intro is a mess! Both fission and fusion bombs are thermonuclear, yet the article distinctly says that only fusion bombs are thermonuclear. Thermonuclear means "relating to or using nuclear reactions that occur only at very high temperatures.", according to me and Wiki. A fission reactions reaches 10^7 degrees kelvin, a fusion reaction reaches 10^8 degrees kelvin, both high temperatures within a factor of ten from each other. So both fission and fusion are using nuclear reactions at high temperatures, they are both thermonuclear by the Wiki definition. That makes the whole introduction invalid and puzzling. Pb8bije6a7b6a3w (talk)
901
2017-09-04 18:59:22.000000 UTC
7989469740.17438754Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Darren Sharper. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?)
902
2017-09-04 23:11:32.000000 UTC
7989797630.17436257Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Penicillin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Keith D (talk)
903
2017-09-04 13:06:13.000000 UTC
7988985320.17426042I'm going offline for today - I'll check back here tomorrow. I'd still like to know how you calculated "Blanchardstown has one of the highest percentage of Foreigners in the Country and the Lowest percentage of White Irish" Begoon
904
2017-09-04 07:04:35.000000 UTC
7988616740.17424166Verrit is not an "American Leftist" organization. It's a liberal organization. I have checked on social media platforms and popular leftist of America are not welcoming this website ans Peter and Hillary are renowned liberals.
905
2017-09-04 15:15:31.000000 UTC
7989149180.17418018Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ryhall. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. I dream of horses  @
906
2017-09-04 23:40:45.000000 UTC
7989828510.17372534Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Troup, Texas, you may be . Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
907
2017-09-04 10:54:09.000000 UTC
7988842000.17360325Last edit to bad image list The last edit that you made to the bad edit list was incomplete. It didn't have the G]] at the end.Naraht (talk)
908
2017-09-04 19:02:47.000000 UTC
7989474160.17350563Sessions is not a reliable source for the claim that immigrants are a "threat to public safety and a burden on our criminal justice system", just as the President isnt a reliable source for the claim that millions illegally voted in 2016 or that climate change is a hoax (I'm sure you disagree though, as you think statements by politicians count as RS). I'm not disputing the accuracy of the DOJ numbers (in case your reading comprehension led you to believe that), I'm saying that they tell us next to nothing, and there's no RS cited that puts those numbers into the appropriate context.
909
2017-09-04 23:15:38.000000 UTC
7989801680.17332323September 2017 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Survivor: Heroes v. Healers v. Hustlers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VietPride10 (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
910
2017-09-04 20:43:33.000000 UTC
7989616860.17324735September 2017 Your recent editing history at Anarchism in the United States shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. dsprc [[User_talk:Dsprc|[talk]''']]
911
2017-09-04 11:29:44.000000 UTC
7988883110.1731339This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of airlines of Latvia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. :(see previous warnings::::) Matthew_hk tc
912
2017-09-04 01:12:33.000000 UTC
7988222890.17299756Semi-protected edit request on 2 September 2016 In the Influence section, under the Music heading, something about the following should be added:In the Blues Traveler song "Justify the Thrill," a section of the lyrics makes reference to the book:"The pig's head on a stick does grinAs we teeter on the brinkHe's singing you are all my childrenMy island's bigger than you think"Professorrook (talk)
913
2017-09-04 18:45:10.000000 UTC
7989450390.17298152People say all kinds of things on the campaign trail. Rosenstein testified that he and Sessions discussed firing Comey for similar reasons to those outlined in their recommendations several months in advance. Campaign rhetoric aside, we have no reason to believe that Rosenstein lied to Congress, as you previously implied.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk)
914
2017-09-04 02:15:13.000000 UTC
7988301510.17288648Forever Young Prior to his stroke, Dick Clark was notable for seeming to never age. There were lots of jokes to that effect, and I believe a moniker along the lines of "America's oldest teenager". Supposedly Kathleen Turner in the film Peggy Sue Gets Married had a line referring to Clark such as, “Look at that man; he never ages." I wouldn't know how to properly source any of this, but it is really one of the most fun facts about Dick Clark, and it's a shame it's not in the article. For people of my generation it was the one of the main things he was known for. 204.145.225.27 (talk)
915
2017-09-04 03:23:45.000000 UTC
7988374900.17285226You reverted my change on Antifa (United States) with the summary . Please look more closely at my edit. If you look at the previous revision and scroll down to the references section, you'll see a big red section of text saying "Cite error: Invalid tag; name "dhs_ter" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page)." The same reference was cited twice; I removed one of them and modified the reference tag so it would just show the content of the first reference (identical to the second) for both. I also fixed another cite error where someone made a typo. I don't appreciate you accusing me of using "personal issues" to change Wikipedia; I made the most minor of changes to fix a citation error. I'd suggest you reevaluate your knee-jerk response to folks trying to improve that page, since apparently even the most trivial of edits provokes this kind of response from you. GorillaWarfare (talk)
916
2017-09-04 05:43:50.000000 UTC
7988521010.17281331You have been indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: .
917
2017-09-04 05:46:38.000000 UTC
7988523130.17281331You have been indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: .
918
2017-09-04 05:42:55.000000 UTC
7988520060.17281331You have been indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: .
919
2017-09-04 05:50:47.000000 UTC
7988526680.17281331You have been indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: .
920
2017-09-04 05:27:31.000000 UTC
7988504750.17275071No Move The video is not a movie trailer for the film, but a viral "prank" video created to promote the film. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚
921
2017-09-04 05:26:59.000000 UTC
7988504220.17275071No Move The video is not a movie trailer for the film, but a viral "prank" video created to promote the film. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚
922
2017-09-04 05:27:17.000000 UTC
7988504400.17275071No Move The video is not a movie trailer for the film, but a viral "prank" video created to promote the film. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚
923
2017-09-04 05:01:11.000000 UTC
7988475770.17256187Maybe. Their reaction does not inspire confidence, for sure, but I have seen all sorts of bad reactions to blocks, and editors have sometimes been able to avoid the bad behavior on the other side of them. I've never been blocked, but I imagine it feels pretty awful if you're someone who's invested in the project. I wouldn't object to an indefinite block if another admin felt it was appropriate, but I'm gonna stick with this course of action for now. I JethroBT drop me a line
924
2017-09-04 01:34:13.000000 UTC
7988252620.17252749Apeasement has been semi'd. Beyond My Ken (talk)
925
2017-09-04 20:10:58.000000 UTC
7989572900.17231053Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Mattythewhite (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
926
2017-09-04 08:17:29.000000 UTC
7988688550.17193405Do not call editors Antifa members That behavior is likely to be considered a breach of discretionary sanctions and could get you topic banned or blocked. It's an easy thing to avoid, of course. Just read and follow talk
927
2017-09-04 11:32:06.000000 UTC
7988885540.17181449Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Split, Croatia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk)
928
2017-09-04 21:21:56.000000 UTC
7989667670.17181146(but what is "tweeded"? Maybe you mean "tweeted"? S Philbrick(Talk)
929
2017-09-04 23:25:07.000000 UTC
7989810870.17179827R. B. Thieme III later commented on how the press descended on the church during this political season to engage in a smear campaign against a conservative political candidate they opposed, much of their reporting distorted and verifiably false.Learned theological critiques place Thieme's teaching well within the sphere of orthodox biblical theology.* Thieme III asserted that the press's reporting on the subject was a smear campaign.
930
2017-09-04 19:21:53.000000 UTC
7989501180.17127056I must be confused, as I cannot recall when or how I presented myself in a manner that was intended to deceive you. Willthacheerleader18 (talk)
931
2017-09-04 20:24:26.000000 UTC
7989591370.17123269i hope i back to editing, one of my articles is under speedy deletion now but i can improve it. i love editing, sharing, improving articles, helping etc, i don't want be blocked, i did nothing, i just wanna back to editing and respecting to my privacy. they made a list for me! come on! i have no sockpuppet. (excuse me me if i can't talk formal english, i learned from movies. ) ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk)
932
2017-09-04 05:26:00.000000 UTC
7988503310.17104793The video is not a movie trailer for the film, but a viral "prank" video created to promote the film. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚
933
2017-09-04 22:33:48.000000 UTC
7989755910.17100929Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Peter Peter Pumpkin Eater. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
934
2017-09-04 21:10:14.000000 UTC
7989651450.17090206If you think that "neutered" is too strong a word, see Tgeorgescu (talk)
935
2017-09-04 21:09:51.000000 UTC
7989650940.17090206If you think that "neutered" is too strong a word, see Tgeorgescu (talk)
936
2017-09-04 01:40:41.000000 UTC
7988262360.17078415‘The idea that it’s good business is a myth’ – why Hollywood whitewashing has become toxicReferences to use. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me)
937
2017-09-04 14:51:01.000000 UTC
7989113480.17072435SPECIFICO, please quit changing the subject. Nobody here thinks that Trump actually fired Comey because of the Justice Department recommendations, so please stop pretending we do. What we do know is that Trump initially SAID it was because of the DOJ recommendations. We also know that was a pretext, and that he soon abandoned the claim. But it is what he said, and that's what our article reports: what he said initially, and what other reasons he gave later, and (we now know) what he said and thought BEFORE firing Comey. I would appreciate it if you would quit these phony arguments that it wasn't a recommendation (it was) and that it wasn't the real reason (of course it wasn't, we all know that). MelanieN (talk)
938
2017-09-04 00:37:58.000000 UTC
7988181730.17043611blatant POV pushing Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.Edit war warning Your recent editing history at Great Firewall of China shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk)
939
2017-09-04 18:14:48.000000 UTC
7989405850.17014065''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at TomSka ‎. General Ization Talk
940
2017-09-04 10:31:17.000000 UTC
7988816280.17001353... that you should with four tildes like this:, otherwise I may to respond?* ... that if you are certain I have made an obvious error, please feel free to and optionally ?
941
2017-09-04 05:31:51.000000 UTC
7988508910.16993053Nomination for deletion of Template:Dimmed namespace Template:Dimmed namespace has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?)
942
2017-09-04 11:05:00.000000 UTC
7988854830.16979423RSes connect these. These are both attacks by (as far as I can tell by the sources) Islamist (and specifically ISIS related) militants using similar tactics. The connection, therefore, is clear.Icewhiz (talk)
943
2017-09-04 10:36:25.000000 UTC
7988822280.16974472Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk)
944
2017-09-04 11:46:55.000000 UTC
7988900540.16974472Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk)
945
2017-09-04 05:00:56.000000 UTC
7988475470.1695971=Dopaminergic alternations associated with stimulant abuse=*May 2017 meta-analysis
946
2017-09-04 10:44:52.000000 UTC
7988831480.1693598Oh no. This is worse than I thought. I've been asap. I noticed if I try and edit while not logged in, I get a message Communication with Oversight = Initial Request =Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 02:54:28 +0000Subject: Copy of your message to Oversight: Help, I've been outed by the blocking processPlease read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nfitz#Urgent_-_OutedHelp!= Response from Oversight =Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:39:46 +0000Subject: Re: [Ticket#201708111000████] Help, I've been outed by the blocking processDear Nfitz,The edits associated with your request cannot be suppressed under our policy as no outing has taken place, as has been explained in replied on your talk page. . If you think this matter needs attention from administrators or editors, please visit the appropriate noticeboard (). Sincerely,The English Wikipedia Oversight team English Wikipedia Oversighthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Oversight-Disclaimer: all mail to this address is answered by volunteers, and responses are not to be considered an official statement of Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.= Response to Oversight =Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:08:44 -0400Subject: Re: [Ticket#201708111000████] Help, I've been outed by the blocking processI agree that there is nothing now to suppress, once autolock is disabled. (and besides, I'm now unblocked).And while under the policy, no outing has taken place, by definition, and everything behaved as designed ... there is still an issue. clearly says that:"The only circumstances in which a user may be associated with an IP address, are certain policy violations detailed by the checkuser policy"However, during the 2-3 days earlier this week, a user (me) was associated with an IP address (our entire office), for anyone in our office, who chose to try and edit a document (whether logged in or not). So while I've not been outed, by the definition of, I've still been outed, by the English-language definition. And the how the system is functioning, and designed, may not be as originally intended. i.e. there maybe a systemic issue.However, this probably isn't an oversight issue. Nor do I particularly want to publish it widely.Can you advise an appropriate avenue? Keeping in mind that I'm right off a controversial block, and I think there's some that will shoot the messenger, before hearing the message.Thanks, █████████= Response from Oversight =Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 05:12:40 +0000Subject: Re: [Ticket#201708111000████] Help, I've been outed by the blocking processDear █████████████@████████████,If you really feel strongly about it, you can discuss it at the talk page of the Blocking policy: However, given your recent behaviour on the site, you may want to think twice pushing this kind of pedantic button. Your block was repeatedly confi
947
2017-09-04 11:49:01.000000 UTC
7988902530.16931991But is exactly what that source is, as it does not indicate nor reflect anything the claim says: it simply contains the term. Again (again), in the author's own words, it is a collection of "neologisms by or about atheists". It does not indicate in any way the author of the term or who uses it. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓
948
2017-09-04 13:45:00.000000 UTC
7989029910.1692795Hi guys, what's going on here ? We finished the war, and[User:Pure conSoulsePure conSouls]] knows very well that I will go to ask Ferret about his opinion, i told her/him about that and he/she accepted .And i didn't write the word "Oficially" again, i've just written the cover information of the game !!!!We're just waiting 4 Ferret opinion, and whatever he says i'll do.He say remove "Officially" i remove it, he says add it, i add it .Ferret is the referee now, OK GUYS ? 😊
949
2017-09-04 18:48:48.000000 UTC
7989455140.16910769Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Irma Stern. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
950
2017-09-04 17:37:44.000000 UTC
7989348350.16885369Okay, you've reverted again, this time without any discussion, and now you're clearly edit warring. Please read for reasons why you shouldn't do this. And, again, please read . Rockypedia (talk)
951
2017-09-04 17:30:38.000000 UTC
7989339010.16885369Okay, you've reverted again, this time without any discussion, and now you're clearly edit warring. Please read for reasons why you shouldn't do this. And, again, please read . Rockypedia (talk)
952
2017-09-04 11:29:29.000000 UTC
7988882980.1683457It is underrepresented because it is not necessary or significant and should stay that way. Moreover folk architecture is dying out so kind of pointless of putting this in a representative/informative article. I understand where you are coming from but this kind of "culture" that you mentioned in that folk section is so unnecessary as it can be added into other parts. '''Other country articles don't have these sections because they are not vital''' look at Germany, France, Lithuania, Belarus etc. These buildings can be found in thin layers in eastern or south-eastern Poland. Not all parts of Poland paint flowers on their houses just as a reminder. Mentioning Slavic gród you are simply repeating what's in the history sections and even the very first image. Also sections like "famous people" I'd cut out as these are simply trashing the place and being repetitive. Before your next edit maybe create a vote on talk to see how it goes. Honestly this article does not require any more trashy trivia about folk culture which can be mentioned elsewhere. Actually this article does not require any changes unless it's cutting the lengthy information in history or other sections. Maybe create a separate article on Polish folk culture. I understand you're trying to point out the "east" but maybe focus on something that is found exclusively in Poland and is actually Polish. The information you have added resembles Ukrainian customs. Similarly with painting eggs and Borscht, which did not originate in Poland. As you said before let's focus on things found exclusively in Poland. And I have been to Zalipie. A primitive village like that does not deserve recognition. It's like placing a separate section for Chernobyl tourism in Ukraine article.Oliszydlowski,
953
2017-09-04 21:41:24.000000 UTC
7989694190.16825385Your Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Madness of King Scar you nominated for -status according to the . This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak Cartoon network freak (talk)
954
2017-09-04 22:19:10.000000 UTC
7989740700.16823135Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of museums in South Carolina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
955
2017-09-04 04:41:36.000000 UTC
7988457150.16789232DriveU Hello, I just viewed your message. I'm in no way associated with DriveU.
956
2017-09-04 20:26:15.000000 UTC
7989593580.16760997Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at X-Acto. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Just plain Bill (talk)
957
2017-09-04 18:22:55.000000 UTC
7989418520.1675558Yeah, I've been dragging my feet on this. Sorry, I find it emotionally taxing to work in the topic. Jclemens (talk)
958
2017-09-04 05:45:35.000000 UTC
7988522390.1672079Correct/Expand definition As of now, it's written in the article that "The accusation of being an SJW carries implications of pursuing personal validation rather than any deep-seated conviction". But that's only half-true.The main problem with SJW is that they promote social justice like some universal and undisputed concept, that it's not. Just look at the wikipedia article about social justice - there is the whole section about its criticism. And that's why people, who criticize social justice itself also criticize SJW. Because what SJW claim to be social justice, in reality, is only their personal views.That's why you should change definition into '''"The accusation of being an SJW carries implications that accused person is either adopting 'progressive' political stance in pursuing personal validation or trying to impose personal views on others by passing them as 'progressive' and 'socially just'."'''193.151.224.4 (talk) :::::: If by 'breaking down' you mean discrediting me by resorting to insults and outright lie.::::::1. Explain please, what is 'editorial oversight', because I haven't found pricise definition in wikipedia guidelines.::::::2. If saying that someone's statements "feel suspiciously like good old-fashioned misogyny" is not accusations of misogyny, then what is?::::::3. I refered to different line, not the one Koncorde quoted.::::::4. There is no mention of Katherine Martin in Allegra's article. Strike 1 for outright lie.::::::5. Check the link in Allegra's Vice article it referes specifically to http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SJW, not to http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=social%20justice%20warrior. So either choice which 'social justice warrior' definition to put on wikipedia was made by wikipedia authors themselves, or Koncorde is lying again. And the rest is just accusations, accompanied by personal insults. Strike 2 for resorting to that in absence of viable arguments.::::::6. Maybe not directly, but claiming that usi
959
2017-09-04 21:14:21.000000 UTC
7989657320.16709435September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. IdreamofJeanie (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
960
2017-09-04 21:11:18.000000 UTC
7989652960.16709435September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. IdreamofJeanie (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
961
2017-09-04 20:48:53.000000 UTC
7989624020.16706826Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of people from East St. Louis, Illinois. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you keep doing this you will end up blocked. You need to provide a reliable, verifiable source that shows the person was born or lived there. Telling us he did is not sufficient. Telling us that an unlinked Wikipedia article supports it is not sufficient. Telling us that when the Wikipedia article doesn't support the claim and is completely unsourced is either incompetence or vandalism. Meters (talk)
962
2017-09-04 03:32:10.000000 UTC
7988383910.1670164Yeah right. Callmemirela 🍁 talk
963
2017-09-04 09:41:59.000000 UTC
7988762550.16663952You'll have seen by the ping from admin Favonian at SPI it was a sock. Does that sound any warning bells? In ictu oculi (talk)
964
2017-09-04 16:15:21.000000 UTC
7989235520.1665761Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Skeleton key. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk)
965
2017-09-04 18:53:30.000000 UTC
7989461430.1665467September 2017 Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Widr (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
966
2017-09-04 03:00:22.000000 UTC
7988353010.16644284Weasel Words Hello Graham11, You have added many Weasel Words into the article. These include the "Use of the passive voice to avoid specifying an authority (e.g. "it is said")"Sentences like "The CPC has been accused of...", "Some have alleged...", and "Some suggest..." and completely unacceptable. Who are these 'some'? Accused by whom? Wikipedia's Biographies of Living Persons policy has a section on 'Avoid gossip and feedback loops', that specifically instructs editors to immediately remove this type of contentious material.Instead of a revert, can you perhaps specifically include (with at least 2 reliable sources) who is making these allegations, and a fair and balances response. Otherwise, leave them out. Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk)
967
2017-09-04 09:46:49.000000 UTC
7988768010.16639091Well, I dunno. It's certainly not a COATRACK, but I agree that the article's structure is not ideal, but it seems to me that you are proposing removing what I feel are important parts of the article. You need to know something about the lifestyle of a pest before you attempt to control it. Why don't you copy the article into a sandbox, sort it out as you think fit and see how it would end up. Cwmhiraeth (talk)
968
2017-09-04 19:02:05.000000 UTC
7989473030.16634601Sessions is not a reliable source for the claim that immigrants are a "threat to public safety and a burden on our criminal justice system", just as the President isnt a reliable source for the claim that millions illegally voted in 2016 (I'm sure you disagree though, as you think statements by politicians count as RS). I'm not disputing the accuracy of the DOJ numbers (in case your reading comprehension led you to believe that), I'm saying that they tell us next to nothing, and there's no RS cited that puts those numbers into the appropriate context.
969
2017-09-04 16:56:38.000000 UTC
7989291790.16628131RequestCan you please semi-protect the article Deportation of the Crimean Tatars for unregistered users? An anonymous IP keeps inserting a lot of undue weight in the article. If he has questions, he can always try to reach consensus on the talk page before disruptive editing.Seiya (talk)
970
2017-09-04 17:03:00.000000 UTC
7989300410.16628131RequestCan you please semi-protect the article Deportation of the Crimean Tatars for unregistered users? An anonymous IP keeps inserting a lot of undue weight in the article. If he has questions, he can always try to reach consensus on the talk page before disruptive editing.Seiya (talk)
971
2017-09-04 08:02:04.000000 UTC
7988667310.16626772September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Jake Brockman/CSD log. Cabayi (talk)
972
2017-09-04 16:16:01.000000 UTC
7989236380.16625649''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Pentecostal Mission, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN talk to me
973
2017-09-04 12:07:35.000000 UTC
7988920540.16611439You may be interested to know that the German word for the hole-carriers on a two-armed torsion engine is die Peritraten, as per General Schramm's work. I think that there may be a link.
974
2017-09-04 04:44:35.000000 UTC
7988459680.16570635I made a report at, hopefully they'll get bored soon. Simplexity22 (talk)
975
2017-09-04 03:46:41.000000 UTC
7988401270.16544525living=no|filmbio-priority=low
976
2017-09-04 11:56:32.000000 UTC
7988909600.16511661Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Social work. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk)
977
2017-09-04 03:28:31.000000 UTC
7988379680.16505869You reverted my change on Antifa (United States) with the summary . Please look more closely at my edit, which I clearly described in my summary as . If you look at the previous revision and scroll down to the references section, you'll see a big red section of text saying "Cite error: Invalid tag; name "dhs_ter" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page)." The same reference was cited twice; I removed one of them and modified the reference tag so it would just show the content of the first reference (identical to the second) for both. I also fixed another cite error where someone made a typo. I don't appreciate you accusing me of using "personal issues" to change Wikipedia; I made the most minor of changes to fix a citation error. I'd suggest you reevaluate your knee-jerk response to folks trying to improve that page, since apparently even the most trivial of edits provokes this kind of response from you. GorillaWarfare (talk)
978
2017-09-04 23:17:16.000000 UTC
7989803310.1650193REDIRECT Talk:Just like a Pill
979
2017-09-04 16:07:00.000000 UTC
7989224420.16469803Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|synthesis]] into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk)
980
2017-09-04 11:48:57.000000 UTC
7988902450.16466267can you tell me what is going on ?! ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk)
981
2017-09-04 12:42:40.000000 UTC
7988958680.1645656hm... this is an edit war as you both know and my actions I'm about to take may... get one or both of you blocked for at least 1 or 2 days. I will look over it before I do anything else and have Ferret on my watchlist so I'll be watching TDLWH to see what he says ♠Dinah♠ 🎤
982
2017-09-04 03:10:17.000000 UTC
7988362400.16441254Please stop your . If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to J. Birney Crum Stadium, you may be . -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉←
983
2017-09-04 01:02:30.000000 UTC
7988209880.16430597The Samuelson's "Economics" Entry. Ray, I see your sensible comments on the Wikipedia entry for Samuelson's "Economics," and write for solace. Your valid point apart, the whole article strikes me as scandalously inept. (I've posted two notes in the talk page over there.) Do you know enough about the Wikipedia system to get the thing pulled and replaced, either by something competent or by a simple placeholder? Best wishes,David Lloyd-Jones (talk)
984
2017-09-04 15:25:07.000000 UTC
7989165620.16417843Don't move any more articles, please. Other editors have moved them back. Page moves that don't have a clear consensus are considered disruptive. Please slow down. Also, please stop citing IMDb - it's not a reliable source for Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk)
985
2017-09-04 15:31:04.000000 UTC
7989174630.1640448Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Scots Dragoon Guards. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) ‎
986
2017-09-04 15:28:33.000000 UTC
7989170840.16390876Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Matty B‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk)
987
2017-09-04 19:10:16.000000 UTC
7989483870.163892Some members are actually antifa supporters like: Bobfrombrockley, who calls himself an antifa supporter in his biography. I have huge respect for him just for recognizing his own bias. I also have respect for your overt bias as a Humanist in your biography. I have mostly strayed from editing the content of political articles until fairly recently, so I haven't put down my own biases. Most editors who edit on a certain topic care immensely about it. This is not their fault. If they support Antifa, say it out loud.
988
2017-09-04 09:16:24.000000 UTC
7988737940.16378836Siddharth0798 (talk)
989
2017-09-04 17:43:10.000000 UTC
7989355580.16336794The Don't ask, don't tell page is about more than just a single memorandum, though. This page already itself a split from Sexual orientation and gender identity in the United States military; I don't see that there's enough material to justify a further split at this time. Funcrunch (talk)
990
2017-09-04 16:42:57.000000 UTC
7989274340.16329041and another admin has blocked the IP. Harvey really doesn't get it, does he? Favonian (talk)
991
2017-09-04 02:31:50.000000 UTC
7988320130.16294095Please re-read this sentence you wrote...::::Yea, that whats a cheap shot. But why not have a little fun?::::If you really think that " if a source tampers with the facts to accommodate to a certain way, then it is not reliable". Therefor both Clarín and La Nación would not be reliable sources: there are many examples that have "accommodated" the facts to serve their own bias. Without looking anywhere and just using my memorie, I would remind you of a Clarín cover that claimed that a minister earned two hundred thousand pesos, and it "mised" by two hundred thousand pesos. ::::Unfortunately, in today's media, this type of falsehoods exist (although it is now fashionable to tell them "post-truth"), especially if they perform war journalism. EMans (talk)
992
2017-09-04 04:30:40.000000 UTC
7988444070.16291374September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did again at All That She Wants, you may be blocked from editing. Traveltoromantis (talk)
993
2017-09-04 04:06:53.000000 UTC
7988421610.16290697Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. livelikemusic talk!
994
2017-09-04 13:25:45.000000 UTC
7989007560.16285291Russian hackers and election meddling Considering;https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-election-cyber/merkel-ally-cites-thousands-of-cyber-attacks-from-russian-ip-addresses-idUSKCN1BF1FA"German authorities have blamed a spate of cyber attacks directed at the German parliament, individual lawmakers, political parties and political think-tanks since summer 2015 on APT 28, a Russian hacker group with links to Moscow.Kloeckner did not say how the attacks had been discovered or what form they had taken. Many recent cyber attacks targeted at German politicians and institutions have used phishing schemes that include attachments with malicious software."and "”The main battle front in this hybrid war in the U.S. as in Germany will likely be in the states, not Berlin or Washington, said Barker, adding: “Those who thought Russian intelligence was going to sit this one out seem to have been proven wrong.”"is most worthy of some contribution to the article of her BLP. Wikipietime (talk)
995
2017-09-04 23:18:20.000000 UTC
7989804400.16274603'Voting' does not 'override' and claims. All I'm doing here is trying to make things clear to you to avoid edit-warring, as I feel that either of you will revert without valid justification any change made you don't 'like' (as 1990sguy has already done), also because you're 'more'... that's not how Wikipedia editing works.:::: We did not agree on any such 'only the attribution' thing today, rather the answers to my demonstrations of transgressions have been more to the tune of 'but... it's fine how it is!'. So you won't oppose changing the lede so that it expresses the nature of the overwhelming majority of sources/authors using the term and whence the term originated? That would be fabulous indeed, and points for all of us. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓
996
2017-09-04 13:29:30.000000 UTC
7989011710.16238031Glad to hear that you didn't close the AfD on the false premise that I was going to improve it. I don't really have a big interest in programming articles, but there are plenty of editors out there who get much more enthusiastic. SpinningSpark
997
2017-09-04 03:28:30.000000 UTC
7988379650.16234727CrowdStrike's fake quotes and fake information about claimed Russia hackI suggest to either adjust or balance CrowdStrike's claims in this article sources. Because according to the Washington D.C. based Voice of America (VOA) which is the largest U.S. international broadcaster and also according to the not-for-profit and independent Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), CrowdStrike were recently exposed with their misattribution of quotes and fake information. In other words, CrowdStrike lied to you. CrowdStrike, the cyber-security firm that initially claimed Russia hacked the DNC and tilted the 2016 election in Donald Trump’s favor, is being accused of misattribution of quotes in a December report. CrowdStrike have since walked back key and central claims in said report, calling their credibility into serious question.Related articles and sources* http://www.voanews.com/a/cyber-firm-rewrites-part-disputed-russian-hacking-report/3781411.html* http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03/23/cybersecurity-firm-that-attributed-dnc-hacks-to-russia-may-have-fabricated-russia-hacking-in-ukraine/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francewhoa (talk • contribs)
998
2017-09-04 23:29:58.000000 UTC
7989816080.16226637Hello... Dear ColinFine,
999
2017-09-04 02:46:38.000000 UTC
7988338400.16208415''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Treaty of Bucharest (1913). Dr. K.
1000
2017-09-04 07:29:45.000000 UTC
7988637970.16201666He also says he was about 6'5.5 later in life due to having a disk removed and about 400 pounds.Cashisclay
1001
2017-09-04 10:23:11.000000 UTC
7988806850.16179876I think it's just generally being slightly over-aggressive to COI editors. I would recommend just putting the tags on and sending the articles to AfD without comment. Explain in a disinterested tone what the issues are and leave it at that. I believe it's possible to have good paid editing (eg: my frequently quoted example of "we will pay you $5 for every unreferenced BLP you completely source and is validated by another, neutral editor"), it's just most if not all examples we come across are not.:In the specific case of Candice Hutchings, I've got no real issue with you starting an AfD and saying "can't find any sources [search link], no way of improving this" - ie: keeping the debate focused on the article. In this instance, I didn't really want to bring this up, as it was only to try and demolish an argument that everyone who disagreed with this COI editor were friends and in collusion with each other, which is nonsense. But also I think it's reasonable that if you're going to talk about another editor, to bring them into the discussion so they're aware of it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)
1002
2017-09-04 13:39:42.000000 UTC
7989023690.16166982Zalipie Wouldn't it be better to replace Zalipie. It is not significant enough. Maybe a typical Polish dworek and a small mention about dworeks in the section? Oliszydlowski,
1003
2017-09-04 01:04:25.000000 UTC
7988212230.16111031The legal/intersex stuff being relevant to the topic is not the issue. How much material you are devoting to it in this article is, per the WP:Due weight policy. And you made a good cut before. After I made this merge request, however, you decided to add a lot of legal/intersex material to the article yet again. I'm not repeating myself on this matter again. We will see what others have to state, either in this discussion or via an RfC discussion after it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk)
1004
2017-09-04 22:43:27.000000 UTC
7989766050.16101266http://www.ds.org.rs/demokratska-stranka-ukratko On the official site the party declair themself in the party program as a socialdemocratic (only!) party. There are no source that the party is social-liberal anymore.
1005
2017-09-04 17:27:05.000000 UTC
7989334190.16094765Anonymous users from this IP address have been temporarily from editing for . If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . Black Kite (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
1006
2017-09-04 02:50:18.000000 UTC
7988342870.16094576Notice Alexbrn (talk)
1007
2017-09-04 19:02:17.000000 UTC
7989473310.16085237Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Saeed Bozdar. If you continue to do so, you will be from editing. KGirl (Wanna chat?)
1008
2017-09-04 15:24:31.000000 UTC
7989164180.16084553No page moves Don't move anymore articles, please. Other editors have moved them back. Page moves that don't have a clear consensus are considered disruptive. Please slow down. Also, please stop citing IMDb - it's not a reliable source for Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk)
1009
2017-09-04 09:14:07.000000 UTC
7988736020.16046064Hey, LWYMMD I'm kinda ambivalent but RFI is amazing! on repeat! —IB [ Poke ]
1010
2017-09-04 11:19:51.000000 UTC
7988872090.16035412You beat me to it. Of course they discuss the Hyksos in comparison with the Israelites. They also mention with approval Donald Redford's views, "has aruged that the echoes of the great events of the Hyksos occupation of Egypt and their violent expulsion from the delta resounded for centuries, to bcome a central, shared memory of the people of Canaan." etc. Tatelyle has the book, it's pages 68 and 69. Doug Weller talk
1011
2017-09-04 08:57:05.000000 UTC
7988721970.16034041September 2017 This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. See this edit. — nihlus kryik  (talk)
1012
2017-09-04 23:55:05.000000 UTC
7989843910.16025662Historical Inaccuracies Even though these are historical NOVELS which do count as work of fictions, there are certain freedoms authors are not generally entitled to take for themselves when writing such works.The warfare depicted in the novels is very wrong, and I don't just say this from the point of view of a medieval combat expert, which I cannot even claim I am. The longbows cited at the end of the 2nd book were only introduced *100* years after the events in which they are described to have been deployed. Honest authors do put a historical note to mention what liberties they took.I think it would be good to add a short paragraph in the article to warn readers of such grave mistakes, which I won't describe here in their entirety. If anyone can confirm this would be ok I shall proceed. Anyway, in short:-the aforementioned longbow problem-the wrong description of the battle of Acre in 1189 were crossbows are given a primary role - the author should have specified the Templars are not even mentioned because he wanted to give the impression they had been erased; my assumption. In reality they fought most of the battle and were responsible for the success of the Christians.-many characters are depicted as evil and ignorant, or as extremely positive, cultivated and sensitive, some traits of their personalities described by the narrator as if they were real history. Such as all the fuss about Saladin's tears. No background is evident here, not even on arab-muslim-islamic websites concerning the "Prophet". Other examples are Heraclius being described as a corrupt degenerate and whoremonger.
1013
2017-09-04 05:30:31.000000 UTC
7988507540.16012932News (software) Hello, my aggressive friend. :)Sad as it might be to hear it, much of what you wrote was wrong.Care to let me tell you what and why?Best regards,Codename Lisa (talk)
1014
2017-09-04 12:45:03.000000 UTC
7988961450.16008899September 2017 Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Andy Dingley (talk)
1015
2017-09-04 23:20:40.000000 UTC
7989806720.15997207Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Uncle Grandpa, you may be . BloodDoll (talk)
1016
2017-09-04 17:06:29.000000 UTC
7989305330.15996926A kitten for you! Peace & Love Cavecanem101 (talk)
1017
2017-09-04 19:37:50.000000 UTC
7989526570.15980494Jan Vertonghen Needs in-line citations...this is basic stuff. GiantSnowman
1018
2017-09-04 21:38:42.000000 UTC
7989690640.15971324Proposed deletion of Firka (software) Hello, Firkafilm. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Firka (software), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:# edit the page# remove the text that looks like this: save the pageAlso, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.Roxy the dog. bark
1019
2017-09-04 17:32:32.000000 UTC
7989341230.159604711) The story says that these numbers are both unauthorized and legal immigrants.* 2) Wash Times is not a RS.* 3) I find no reporting on this in reliable news outlets.* 4) There is absolutely no context provided about the figures. Are they in federal prisons for immigration-related offenses? Are immigrants overrepresented in federal prisons because federal law enforcement prioritizes violations of immigration law? This is why we use reliable sources: because they generally provide the appropriate context rather than incomplete and misleading numbers.* '''5) Even if the figures were correct, they should not be put at the front of the 'illegal immigration and crime' section''', given that the figures provide very little information about the relationship between illegal immigration and crime (the only thing the figure suggest is that the law enforcement arm, which has immigration enforcement as one of its few major law enforcement tasks, does a lot of immigration enforcement), yet will mislead lots of readers into thinking the numbers do reflect on the relationship between illegal immigration and crime. Snooganssnoogans (talk)
1020
2017-09-04 17:48:20.000000 UTC
7989363010.1595527Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Music of Uruguay. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
1021
2017-09-04 14:47:52.000000 UTC
7989109500.15934175''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michail Antonio. Mattythewhite (talk)
1022
2017-09-04 04:29:24.000000 UTC
7988442530.15933056Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nickel(II) chloride. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. timawesomeness ⟨talk⟩
1023
2017-09-04 17:52:42.000000 UTC
7989369100.15901008I really think we're engaged in makework here that isn't helping anything. The 2nd paragraph is good enough as it is and doesn't look at all POV to me; an avowed Trump-hatin' lib'ral SJW. Can we please move on to something more constructive? ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.
1024
2017-09-04 20:00:35.000000 UTC
7989556360.15899104''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Reddy. Mattythewhite (talk)
1025
2017-09-04 19:13:09.000000 UTC
7989487670.15883109I'm not interested in sophistry or straw men. I asked for reliable sources calling it a monarchy. If there aren't any, then the order shouldn't be described as one. If there are many, then the objection is refuted. DrKay (talk)
1026
2017-09-04 19:12:43.000000 UTC
7989487140.15855207Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pat Gilroy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?)
1027
2017-09-04 05:51:49.000000 UTC
7988527850.15853244Please comment on Talk:Trump Tower wiretapping allegations The is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump Tower wiretapping allegations. Legobot (talk)
1028
2017-09-04 05:29:12.000000 UTC
7988506210.15853244Please comment on Talk:Trump Tower wiretapping allegations The is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump Tower wiretapping allegations. Legobot (talk)
1029
2017-09-04 08:23:41.000000 UTC
7988694100.15842685Apart from the first 3 sentences, the entire poverty section starts lacking relevance and it contains grossly off topic content. What corruption has to do with poverty? It comes under economy though, since it is one factor. What child labour has to do with poverty? It doesn't belong to this whole article unless we are talking about labour. Since this is FA, we can remove the problematic content per (talk)
1030
2017-09-04 15:34:59.000000 UTC
7989180160.15828168''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Dammitkevin (talk)
1031
2017-09-04 19:45:36.000000 UTC
7989536570.15823165EL to ROIR Please read [WP:VAND]. I read the article you suggested and I get your poorly made point. Now you will stop overreacting and leave me alone, as we are done. Nick (talk)
1032
2017-09-04 19:12:32.000000 UTC
7989486830.15808542Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk TV (Philippines). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
1033
2017-09-04 03:37:25.000000 UTC
7988390200.15795836Subaru and you Hey Guy, I saw that your ANI report about the persistent vandalism on the list of Subaru engines article didn't really get any traction (ha!). If you want to spin me up on the details, I'd be happy to help you watchdog the article. A Traintalk
1034
2017-09-04 09:02:27.000000 UTC
7988726310.15778211nirmala sitaramyya is the new defence minister of india
1035
2017-09-04 02:29:28.000000 UTC
7988317730.15776804September 2017 Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our  – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our and policies for more information).We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to  – read our to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. —C.Fred (talk)
1036
2017-09-04 13:30:45.000000 UTC
7989013150.15757471I'm not the Wikipedia police, I'm just trying to help as much as I can. Your suggestion isn't a bad one, maybe someone will take the time to look at those articles later. Perhaps the best thing to do, since we have beaten this dead horse for quite some time now, and one second opinion has not helped to resolve the impasse, is for me to fail the article, then you can immediately re-nominate it for someone else to review it. Let me know your thoughts on this and I will take care of it. DoctorG  (talk)
1037
2017-09-04 18:37:04.000000 UTC
7989439050.15741073So, you're even not going to bother responding to any of my concerns except #2 and #3 where you just go "nah". As for your other comments, Jeff Sessions is not a RS on immigration and crime, and the DOJ website does clear up any of the concerns I expressed. Even if you don't deem #2 and #3 valid, #1, #4 and #5 still make the text wholly inappropriate for Wikipedia. Snooganssnoogans (talk)
1038
2017-09-04 18:58:25.000000 UTC
7989468350.1573772Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Penicillium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?)
1039
2017-09-04 00:11:10.000000 UTC
7988152470.15734826Defying orders to the contrary, I wanted to help answer some of your questions about adding additional states to Template:WikiProject United States. When I was still actively editing my attempt was to try to do just that, to include all the inactive and defunct projects and any other US related ones that wanted to into a central banner similar to Military history and Biography, not to Mention Africa, Asia and a number of others. Hyperbole of a corporate takeover aside, my intention was to use the WPUS project as a central base from which to monitor and maintain articles on the other related projects. Working from a central location allows better visibility and the ability to ask questions of a larger community; standardize and eliminate redundancy, etc.. Some did not agree and sought to destroy me and eventually succeeded after years of fighting them and standing up against bullies for the editors on this site like you who are actively improving it. Those projects like Oregon, Florida, Alabama and others all decided they didn't want to participate. In most cases it was one or 2 people ONLY and most of them are now inactive as you noticed.
1040
2017-09-04 18:14:19.000000 UTC
7989405060.157219Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jack. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?)
1041
2017-09-04 14:51:52.000000 UTC
7989114610.15720846Freddie Mills It is illegal to register a birth outside of the birth district. Although the following reference probably shouldn't be used on Wikipedia, it also confirms his parents married in Christchurch.http://www.whodoyouthinkyouaremagazine.com/forum/post26107.html
1042
2017-09-04 17:21:24.000000 UTC
7989326840.15662174I provided some assistence to TDLWH around the time they registered, as well as Pure conSouls for that matter. I've been gone for two days for the US holiday weekend though. With this being back and forth across 4-5 different user talks (I've got like 7 ping notifications in different places on it), I really don't have the willpower to try to piece it together much just yet lol. Does it still require any attention or are the actors behaving for the moment? ferret (talk)
1043
2017-09-04 19:54:41.000000 UTC
7989548290.15639374September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Block evasion by User:MusicLover650. Binksternet (talk)
1044
2017-09-04 18:09:10.000000 UTC
7989396810.15637557I've renamed your account (from User:Antibot009), and someone should be along fairly soon to unblock you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk)
1045
2017-09-04 23:48:36.000000 UTC
7989836970.15619233September 2017A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to . Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk)
1046
2017-09-04 00:29:46.000000 UTC
7988172530.15607812I meant the sourcing of this article was not verified, it would not be appropriate to put a statement about killing NATO soldiers from an unreliable source. Please read the article, the statements from the official were not verified. But I am not one to get into needless arguments, therefore I will add the Tag you suggested. Please reply to confirm. Thanks. Todualable (talk) Todualable
1047
2017-09-04 06:09:02.000000 UTC
7988550720.15603788Only warning If you ever ask again that we give you responses to reduce the possibility of harm to yourself or others because of your desire to conduct experiments without competent advice, I will ask for you to be blocked. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science&diff=798854795&oldid=798851096] Nil Einne (talk)
1048
2017-09-04 07:55:40.000000 UTC
7988661410.1559963I'm just as puzzled as you are. The redirect of this page and calling you out as an "unauthorized user" do not appear to be justified, so I have reverted those edits. Similar actions have been performed at other pages by a different IP user who has since been blocked. Kbseah (talk)
1049
2017-09-04 15:10:42.000000 UTC
7989141150.15564348''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Michy Batsuayi. Egghead06 (talk)
1050
2017-09-04 02:28:43.000000 UTC
7988316960.15547432Referring to ship as "she" or "her" Referring to a ship as she or her is unnecessary personification. Wikipedia's goal is to present the truth, and the truth of the matter is that ships have no reproductive organs. English, unlike some other languages, does not tend to assign gender to most words. For example objects such as television, table, apple, car, shovel, lamp, and so on have no gender assigned.Neutralizing a word's gender also denotes equality between the sexes. For example: Police Officer instead of policeman, Fire Fighter instead of fireman. Referring to an object as a "she" is objectifying to women, would it make sense to refer to the ship as "he"? I recommend that the ship be referred to as "it".I recommend that the ship be referred to as "it". — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartianColony (talk • contribs)
1051
2017-09-04 00:45:46.000000 UTC
7988190800.15539208No worries, and its late here. night. Ceoil (talk)
1052
2017-09-04 18:35:44.000000 UTC
7989436840.15505844I rewrote it to clarify and referenced also the Department of Justice's official website, they having the exact numbers and explaining it all. It also reads: “Illegal aliens who commit additional crimes in the United States are a threat to public safety and a burden on our criminal justice system,” said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. So that might be something to add about it. Many news sources cover this. I have no idea why you don't consider that major newspaper a reliable source. User:Dream Focus Dream Focus
1053
2017-09-04 18:28:21.000000 UTC
7989426920.15505844I rewrote it to clarify and referenced also the Department of Justice's official website, they having the exact numbers and explaining it all. It also reads: “Illegal aliens who commit additional crimes in the United States are a threat to public safety and a burden on our criminal justice system,” said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. So that might be something to add about it. Many news sources cover this. I have no idea why you don't consider that major newspaper a reliable source. User:Dream Focus Dream Focus
1054
2017-09-04 13:53:27.000000 UTC
7989040040.15495326Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Government of Japan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
1055
2017-09-04 11:53:08.000000 UTC
7988906430.1549485Edit-war If you don't want to be part of an edit war, don't revert edits with incorrect quotes of policy. I'm sorry that I removed the wrong source, I missed that inbetween your incorrect policy quote and the edit I reverted you had changed findagrave to an acceptable source instead; but an edit war is not had by one side alone, so you"ld better stop complaining about it. Fram (talk)
1056
2017-09-04 11:29:52.000000 UTC
7988883410.15483549I see no problem with the sentence "This organization was determined to expel heretics": it is describing accurately how the League saw these unfortunate people. History can only be understood from the point of view of those involved – and that is by no means to say ''tout comprendre, c'est tout pardonner''! Deipnosophista (talk)
1057
2017-09-04 01:17:34.000000 UTC
7988230730.15467505External links modified Hello fellow Wikipedians,I have just modified 17 external links on Polish areas annexed by Nazi Germany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130303110620/http://www.ushmm.org/education/resource/poles/poles.php to http://www.ushmm.org/education/resource/poles/poles.php*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kki.net.pl/~museum/rozdz2%2C6.htm*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kki.net.pl/~museum/rozdz2%2C6.htm*Added archive https://archive.is/20120527021449/http://www.dac.neu.edu/holocaust/Hitlers_Plans.htm to http://www.dac.neu.edu/holocaust/Hitlers_Plans.htm*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031203151512/http://fundamentalbass.home.mindspring.com/c9052.htm to http://fundamentalbass.home.mindspring.com/c9052.htm*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018004836/http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf to http://www.igipz.pan.pl/zpz/Political_migrations.pdf*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dac.neu.edu/holocaust/Hitlers_Plans.htm*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031203151512/http://fundame
1058
2017-09-04 14:36:51.000000 UTC
7989093840.15465069Done. Somebody needs to find a new hobby. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)
1059
2017-09-04 17:04:55.000000 UTC
7989303170.1544691I have not met Dr. UWENBO but have heard of his excellent work on people's life. We contacted Dr. UWENBO and he started his work on HIS life and right now my Husband is cured. He was diagnosed with Herpes And Hiv and after taking Dr. UWENBO Herbal medicine he was cured. You can reach him dr.uwenboherbalhome@gmail.com OR druwenboherbalhome@outlook.comWhatsApp/call +2349052309005, and get your help..He can as well cure the following diseases/virus,Blood presureHep BHBVHPVHSV 1, 2 and 3Gernital WartsCold sores DiabitiesCancerVigina itching/DiseasesBad BreathSTDOvaria CystOvaria cancerBrain TumorsMouth OdourUnable to get pregnantHeart problemsKidney problems/damageLiver problems AlsAlcersStrokeEpilepsy Short sightedness Low sperm count, e.t.c.
1060
2017-09-04 20:48:54.000000 UTC
7989624080.1543601Anarchy in the United states The article is possibly a content fork of this one. We could discuss merging/deletion over there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anarchy_in_the_United_States#Merge_or_deletion Vectoor (talk)
1061
2017-09-04 18:39:45.000000 UTC
7989442960.15430322Please let me know what we need to do for this? Keyar.srinivasan (talk)
1062
2017-09-04 22:00:47.000000 UTC
7989716900.15409169Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Llama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kbseah (talk)
1063
2017-09-04 02:47:47.000000 UTC
7988339820.15394919Washington Mutual now Chase is worse of a bank Since the Take of Chase Bank, they have flooded outsourcing jobs outside the US to see workin lower labor countries from India, Mexico, Canada, Philippines for wages that pay as low as $.25 centsan hour. If it impossible to speak to anybody working in the US that works for Chase Bank and Chaseis really hurting the economy by hiring outsource labor. They even wasted $500 million to give all theformer Washington Mutual banks a new look that really made customers paid for the make over.I miss Washington Mutual even though they weren't perfect but better than Chase bank. It's a sad story —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.169.234.143 (talk)
1064
2017-09-04 09:14:03.000000 UTC
7988735980.15382227Wikiklaas reverting my entry. Wikiklaas can you please contact me re what you dont understand about my entry.I sent you wikitalk to you as well so I hope I am not duplicating where i should leave this message. Veritylookingfortruth (talk)
1065
2017-09-04 02:40:07.000000 UTC
7988329920.1535641That's simple false. Página 12 it's considered mainstream newspaper. Its on you to prove that it's not a reliable source. :::::On the other hand, seen and considering that this source is used quite a few more articles, you should take these proof not to this talk but where it corresponds.EMans (talk)
1066
2017-09-04 19:39:18.000000 UTC
7989528470.15347908Can someone put something in about white gold? She did that too in 2017. TY.
1067
2017-09-04 18:12:18.000000 UTC
7989402060.15318723Membership isn't required. It is only required that you use your influence to elevate yourself while making as many as possible suffer in despair. Your success in life is equal only to the suffering you cause to those who will not join. Leppworlder (talk)
1068
2017-09-04 12:56:03.000000 UTC
7988974100.1531514You're dissecting (to distract from the main point), and again, we don't 'interpret' sources ('tell people what sources really say), nor use two sources for two parts that 'conclude' something together... those are both examples of, and that's exactly what the lede claim does. The source in no way indicates what the claim states (a claim that would suggest 'everyone knowledgable': it is, in fact, but an empty appeal to authority), period.:::::::: But both your example and mine show that usage of this term is overwhelmingly by one point of view/origin (a religious one) with two different meanings across two time periods. How could one not want to make this clear to the reader? THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓
1069
2017-09-04 20:40:00.000000 UTC
7989611810.15297133Carptrash. I'm wrong. The changes I made thru the links on my User page DID correct the wikilinks on your Userboxes. What power! BoringHistoryGuy (talk)
1070
2017-09-04 00:55:39.000000 UTC
7988201790.15293698Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:John Laurens. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dane talk
1071
2017-09-04 00:05:38.000000 UTC
7988145610.15281948} This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2017) {style="width:100%; padding:2px;" class="TAFI-weekly"! Hello, Airplane Maniac.The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:''''''Please be bold and help to improve this article!Previous selections:  • Get involved with the TAFI project. You can:Nominate an article Review nominationsPosted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •
1072
2017-09-04 18:36:00.000000 UTC
7989437330.1524938Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edits you made to Anthem of the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic and Anthem of the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk)
1073
2017-09-04 03:52:22.000000 UTC
7988406500.15244035Misleading work titleThe third article cited on the page, the one from the Chicago Tribune, clearly identifies Mrs. Wu as a "SPEECH PATHOLOGIST". Now, she may have been classed as a "teacher" for payroll purposes, but the page lies when it identifies her as a "teacher" (as she does herself, by failing to disclose the true nature of her work). JTMLXX (talk) User: JTMLXX
1074
2017-09-04 20:20:19.000000 UTC
7989585500.1522702, I seem to recall you pulling this stunt on the Russia interference page, so taking a stroll thru your edit history...; unwatching Brianna Wu, (aformentioned) unwatching Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, unwatching James O'Keefe, unwatching Alternative facts, unwatching Marjorie Cameron, unwatching Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, unwatching WIndowsXP. We could really do without the Diva quitting. TheValeyard (talk)
1075
2017-09-04 06:09:50.000000 UTC
7988551870.15212904Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop writing about yourself, see Jimfbleak - talk to me?
1076
2017-09-04 02:53:54.000000 UTC
7988346420.1520465Blocked for legal threatsYou have been indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: .(For details see my talk.) —David Eppstein (talk)
1077
2017-09-04 17:29:11.000000 UTC
7989336980.15202868September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Template:Kansas City Chiefs roster, you may be blocked from editing. Rockchalk717 :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
1078
2017-09-04 23:29:39.000000 UTC
7989815730.15190129September 2017 Anonymous users from this IP address have been from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . GorillaWarfare (talk) : If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
1079
2017-09-04 11:42:09.000000 UTC
7988895510.15177965Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at I watch Spongebob Squarepants from the episode Boating SchoolPatrick: Go to your closet for a Surprise!Spongebob: (Slide) Okay I'm at the Closet Patrick: Listen Carefully, What's Pink and Square at the same time?Spongebob: I Don't Know PatrickPatrick: (Fanfare Ta Da CRT044001)Spongebob: Pat Don't do ThatYour edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Flickerd (talk) 01:16 November 22 2015, October 8 2016, November 5 2016 and April 9 2017
1080
2017-09-04 06:41:19.000000 UTC
7988594660.151538Assessment - September 2017 Obviously a lot of work has gone into this article by some intelligent people. But I believe current version has some major problems in terms of completeness and . Approximately three quarters of the words in this article are about the appearance, size, and shape of breasts. Plastic surgery is given around 600 words, which is more than the number of words on puberty, female sexual pleasure, cancer, and breastfeeding combined. From my perspective as a female reader, these ratios are plainly ludicrous. To make a more conventional Wikipedia argument, the article’s emphasis on breast size and shape, and on cosmetic surgery, is way out of line with how high-quality secondary and tertiary sources on women’s or men’s health discuss the breast. Consider, for example, the WebMD article on breast changes in menopause. It lists three types of changes: 1. Tenderness or pain, 2. Changes in breast size and shape, and 3. Lumps in the breast. The Wikipedia article mentions menopause four times. Every single one of those four mentions relates menopause to changes in breast size and/or shape, and to nothing else. And this example is not an isolated problem. I would expect a general article on this subject to talk a lot more about breast physiology, about sensations in the breast that are experienced by women and girls, about the health concerns that owners of breasts have (girls and women worry about their breasts a lot), and about the significance of the subject to infants. Some particulars I’d like to see are:* Expand discussion of breast changes during puberty The level of factual detail that is routinely taught to 11 year olds is not excessive detail for this article.* Expand discussion of breast changes during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and menopause. * Describe where and how colostrum, and then mature milk, are produced within the breast. A good online source about the physiological basis of breastfeeding is here, from the WHO: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148970/* Describe the hormonal and physical processes that cause ejection of milk* Mention that breastfed infants and toddlers nurse for comfort and bonding as well as for nutrition* Describe signs of breast cancer, and detection methods. (In case this needs needs to be said - editors of all genders can write well about this stuff.)Meanwhile, this article has an emphasis on plastic surgery that fills up most of four sections. A more accurate title for this article right now could be “Breast size and shape, and how surgery can help”. The section on body image gives no alternatives to "a woman considers her breasts deficient in some respect" except surgery and hormonal treatments. The idea of accepting one's body as it is is not mentioned. Given the limited extent to whi
1081
2017-09-04 01:35:32.000000 UTC
7988254290.15146115September 2017 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benigno_Aquino_Jr., you may be blocked from editing. ''You are censoring and deleting contributions that conform with Wikipedia policies on Verifiability [W:V] and Reliable Sources [W:RS], just because they don't follow your political beliefs. If you have specific issues on contribution you want to delete, raise them specifically in the talk page and cite the relevant Wikipedia policy. '' Thetruth16 (talk)
1082
2017-09-04 20:20:53.000000 UTC
7989586330.15140173Curtsey with wobble Victuallers (talk)
1083
2017-09-04 07:42:16.000000 UTC
7988648770.15115291Hello @JRPG, thanx for your reply. I am very new to the Wiki community, so I can't reply to all this. If it is a "foul", it can be deleted. Just started learning! Fares57 (talk)
1084
2017-09-04 15:25:03.000000 UTC
7989165460.15112445September 2017 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Disney theatrical animated features. Geraldo Perez (talk)
1085
2017-09-04 09:41:59.000000 UTC
7988762540.15112215Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oxford. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dave.Dunford (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
1086
2017-09-04 16:51:14.000000 UTC
7989285340.15102684I do know the case. And I stated in my edit summary leave this on his talk page. Do NOT leave it on a userpage. That is disruptive and I have seen users be blocked for it. I'd rather not see that happen and I am trying to help. I won't remove is again. I'll leave that to the user who owns the page because I'd rather not get into this. ♠Dinah♠ 🎤
1087
2017-09-04 05:17:49.000000 UTC
7988493490.15100788Yeah, a wait and see approach wouldn't hurt either. I just don't feel that this person is fit to be an editor here for a number of reasons. Blake Gripling (talk)
1088
2017-09-04 19:56:29.000000 UTC
7989550660.15093905Thank you! The South/Central Asia nationalistic sockmasters are very confusing. GABgab
1089
2017-09-04 22:46:19.000000 UTC
7989769430.15091473I don't think it is snow. I think it is moving water. I think you are referring to this image. Bus stop (talk)
1090
2017-09-04 03:16:53.000000 UTC
7988368620.15075609The lead's megacite contains a broad cross-section of representative reliable sources. If your argument is that these sources have been and that is more favorable to Mensch, you need to demonstrate that with sources, or you're just wasting our time.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk)
1091
2017-09-04 09:25:04.000000 UTC
7988745460.15074642The Irish section or on white flight RTE
1092
2017-09-04 04:19:00.000000 UTC
7988432940.15062404Horned lizard Thank you . I attempted the same, was caught in an edit conflict and walked away. My edit summary was 'no creative writing here.' For what it's worth. 2601:188:180:11F0:4510:6B10:E9EA:E8F6 (talk)
1093
2017-09-04 18:51:16.000000 UTC
7989458380.15058017If you don't believe the Attorney General of the United States or official data on the Department of Justice's website is a reliable source, then you are just in denial. I'm not going to waste time trying to reason with you, I'll just wait for others to respond. User:Dream Focus Dream Focus
1094
2017-09-04 22:43:31.000000 UTC
7989766130.15052903''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Internalized oppression. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk)
1095
2017-09-04 07:17:19.000000 UTC
7988627490.15042897I contacted bot owner about a previous instance back in April but didn't get a response. Rjwilmsi
1096
2017-09-04 01:44:09.000000 UTC
7988267610.15036365September 2017 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sexual fluidity has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.* For help, take a look at the introduction.* The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sexual fluidity was changed by 78.145.222.85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96123 on 2017-09-04T01:44:06+00:00 .Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk)
1097
2017-09-04 05:55:46.000000 UTC
7988532190.15027028CodeI think this is what you are looking for:* Cochrane Reviews I am concerned that others edit med templates without consensus but I get scolded and reverted. I would like to collaborate with you on a Women's Health search template but don't want to bother if I keep getting stone-walled. Best Regards, Bfpage (talk)
1098
2017-09-04 21:01:52.000000 UTC
7989640570.14991789Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chryston High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk)
1099
2017-09-04 23:06:44.000000 UTC
7989793200.14991236noBig Añu (talk)
1100
2017-09-04 23:36:43.000000 UTC
7989823650.14936697I would also like to add, the truck was not a Western Star. It was a Kenworth.
1101
2017-09-04 16:54:15.000000 UTC
7989288900.14931893''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carpetbagger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk)
1102
2017-09-04 16:07:27.000000 UTC
7989225150.14921817Thanks for the replies, I took some time to take a better look at what else is categorized as domestic terrorism in us and see that it probably should be included there.Gabriel syme (talk)
1103
2017-09-04 23:14:51.000000 UTC
7989800830.14910994'Voting' does not 'overritde' and claims. All I'm doing here is trying to make things clear to you to avoid edit-warring, as I feel that either of you will revert without valid justification any change made you dont'like' (as 1990sguy has already done), also because you're 'more'... that's not how Wikipedia editing works.:::: So neither of you would have any problem with changing the lede so that it reflects the origin and usage (as in 'by who') the term 'state atheism'? We did not agree on any such thing today, rather the answers to my demonstrations have been more to the tune of 'but... it's fine how it is!'. So you won't oppose changing the lede so that it expresses the nature of the overwhelming majority of sources/authors using the term and whence the term originated? That would be fabulous indeed, and points for all of us. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓
1104
2017-09-04 01:34:25.000000 UTC
7988252900.14896797Appeasement has been semi'd. Beyond My Ken (talk)
1105
2017-09-04 13:53:36.000000 UTC
7989040240.14886363Dealing with you and your cohort is like being Rodney King on the ground dealing with LA Cops. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:6B4D:A600:F0A0:5F62:D2B3:7FC2 (talk • contribs) 13:36 4 September 2017 (UTC):You have been blocked for multiple personal attacks. Instructions are on your user page for appealing the block. — Maile (talk)
1106
2017-09-04 21:57:33.000000 UTC
7989713340.14886275No, I'm saying you're missing the point (although other people have been decent enough to debate you on it). Which is why I have had to keep repeating it. Happy to stop doing that now. And you and a random IP doesn't amount to much more than you, I'm afraid, even if it isn't you logged out. N-HH talk/edits
1107
2017-09-04 09:50:44.000000 UTC
7988772400.1488052''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [trigger the edit filter], as you did at Nerve, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk)
1108
2017-09-04 21:24:24.000000 UTC
7989671150.1487285You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Timberlake discography. Ss112
1109
2017-09-04 19:19:10.000000 UTC
7989497230.14861527Can you describe your revert? You haven't even joined this conversation. We had came to conclusion that the different interpretations of dasa would be briefly mentioned, but since we are not going to that path on this article, it was a better choice to get rid of the disputed word. Which part you didn't understood? Capitals00 (talk)
1110
2017-09-04 05:56:50.000000 UTC
7988533520.1486045Russia Today is a government-run/funded organ for the Putin regime, and is not considered to be a Reliable Source. HammerFilmFan (talk)
1111
2017-09-04 12:26:46.000000 UTC
7988940570.14859435Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:AFL Ladder/2008. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) I noticed you are in an editing dispute. May I link you to this?
1112
2017-09-04 08:51:38.000000 UTC
7988717590.14859435Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:AFL Ladder/2008. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) I noticed you are in an editing dispute. May I link you to this?
1113
2017-09-04 04:12:04.000000 UTC
7988426330.1484953Well, no input on this subject. I have not forgotten about it but to some extent hoped that perhaps we could just avoid any mention. Though in my heart of hearts it seems that we should try to find some way to include a mention. I've read what I could find Wash. Po. also has an article. A quote from that article: '' Jacka-s,” was how [a spokesperson] described both sides, meaning the white nationalists, who billed the gathering as Unite the Right, and the counterprotesters, many marching under the banner of Antifa, for “anti-fascist.” Yingling also criticized police, saying that officers were poorly prepared for the violence and not assertive enough in combating it and that they should have enlisted the militiamen to help prevent the mayhem.'' (When I read that I really did wonder how a supposedly rational adult might actually believe that the police should ask heavily armed volunteers for assistance. Very weird.) ::I've known about these militia groups for many years and my impression of them has, in all honesty, not been very good. On the other hand, I accept that in their view they are upholding the Constitution in a very patriotic manner, using arms as (in their opinion) we are supposed to do. Anyway, from my reading they came (armed to the teeth :O) to support free speech on both sides and did not take part in any violence but merely stood by and observed...I guess? Do you have any more thoughts? Gandydancer (talk)
1114
2017-09-04 20:26:14.000000 UTC
7989593540.14834766pbctimes.com*This website was spammed onto Eid al-Adha and Islamic Society of Central New York, most likely by the same person who seems to be hopping accounts/IPs. Content-wise, it is inferior to anything Wikipedia has to offer and I would also not regard this as a reliable source. In other words, I do not see any use for a link to this website in "External links" or "References". Below is a list of dates and relevant diffs.*04-Sep-2017: Eid, ISCNY *; 30-Jul-2017: ISCNY*; 07-Aug-2017: Eid, Eid, Eid
1115
2017-09-04 10:35:29.000000 UTC
7988821030.14819895You may be from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Drone.Your edits have been automatically marked as and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Drone was changed by 31.217.245.17 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961853 on 2017-09-04T10:35:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk)
1116
2017-09-04 14:39:25.000000 UTC
7989097790.14817373Nomination of Lyle F. Bull for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyle F. Bull is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyle F. Bull until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ψλ ● ✉
1117
2017-09-04 18:48:57.000000 UTC
7989455360.14814904Even if you consider the VIPS' statement FRINGE and UNDUE, this is no reason to exclude Bershidsky's own commentary that actual evidence of Russian involvement was not presented to the public, and that finger-pointing at Russia "may be an Iraq-sized mistake". He's not fringe, he's not a conspiracy theorist, he's not a "Putin apologist", and his opinion is independent from VIPS (he used the release of VIPS memo more as a pretext to express it). That being said, Scott Shane also criticized the lack of transparency in the investigation; Bershidsky pretty much echoed his statements. S. Roix (talk)
1118
2017-09-04 04:20:50.000000 UTC
7988434580.14814238''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' September 2017 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KH-1 (talk)
1119
2017-09-04 16:47:59.000000 UTC
7989280930.14774895the line you ♠Dinah♠ continue to change is mine...I'm the autor of that citation.I just ask that User: SamHolt6 SamHolt6 indicate the source.Nothing "disruptive. If you do not know cases, stay away.Cavecanem101 (talk)
1120
2017-09-04 18:39:45.000000 UTC
7989442940.14760435You're incorrect. The first source, which clearly says "largest regional theme park", is primary anyway, so not as good as a secondary source. So when they omit the "regional" in the next paragraph, that looks like just more promotional hyperbole. Point is it's not a good source because it comes from the company. The new source you added clearly states "The Texas-based company announced today that it is ... creating a single attraction it says will be the world’s largest theme park" - notice the "it says"? Again, the article author is attributing that claim to a reliable source. At the end of the day, there are reliable sources that state Animal Kingdom is 580 acres; unfortunately that trumps your "insider knowledge." I'm asking you nicely once more to please revert the changes you've made, which will avert the need for an admin to block your IP address. Rockypedia (talk)
1121
2017-09-04 20:03:03.000000 UTC
7989560260.14754932The opening sentence should not say "...by artists who are living in the twenty-first century." That does not make sense. Bus stop (talk)
1122
2017-09-04 11:52:06.000000 UTC
7988905560.14719982Thank you, the table had be driving me nuts for a little while! Govvy (talk)
1123
2017-09-04 21:01:21.000000 UTC
7989639640.14709266A barnstar for you! {style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|-|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" I don't know whether you will like this or not but these is a small token as an appreciation for the humongous anti-vandalism fighting work you do. Seeing a doctor working so hard is really inspirational. Thank you once again from the bottom of my heart. Anoptimistix "Message Me" |}
1124
2017-09-04 06:43:10.000000 UTC
7988596840.14705771User:1990'sguy, You've been extensively editing the article since the above was posted, which makes it seem as though you are pointedly ignoring it (and ). Since you have already demonstrated that you will revert any edit you 'don't like', if you continue to ignore this question, I will have no choice but to bring outside attention to it. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓
1125
2017-09-04 22:53:59.000000 UTC
7989778860.14703932Proposed deletion of DestinAsian The article DestinAsian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:Non-notable Indonesian travel magazine. Article has no independent sources. World's Lamest Critic (talk)
1126
2017-09-04 02:47:36.000000 UTC
7988339590.14689122Bine (mythology) hoax articleI just discovered the article Bine (mythology), which was created eleven years ago with this edit () by a user with an edit history consisting of only three edits total. The article was an orphan and I had no idea that it existed until Eno Lirpa added a link to it in the article List of Mesopotamian deities just this morning. The article is totally uncited and is clearly a complete hoax. It rambles on about garbled nonsense involving supplying demons with magic wings to prepare them for the "Second Coming." It then goes on to explain that Bine was really a mortal "carpenter" who died and rose again.At first, I thought that there might be a real deity somewhere behind the nonsense, so I turned it into a redirect to Akkadian mythology, assuming that I would be able to rewrite it using information from reliable sources. Then it occurred to me that, from what very little knowledge I have of Akkadian, the word Bine does not even remotely sound like Akkadian and the alternative form Brythe is definitely not Akkadian because Akkadian does not contain dental fricatives, nor is there any letter or symbol that is typically transliterated as the letter y. I think that the entire article should be deleted as a hoax. Katolophyromai (talk)
1127
2017-09-04 21:40:07.000000 UTC
7989692340.14677419Support People come to Wikipedia to learn about something they read elsewhere, and it's just a basic fact that an extremely large section of the American public thinks he is. For people who think he is AND for people who think he is not, this article should help them to decide for themselves. It's not about calling anyone X name or Y name. It's about including the incidents which people point to as why they see him as a bigot and letting the public decide for themselves if they share that view (source for what the public thinks about this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/01/7-percent-of-donald-trump-supporters-think-hes-racist/). Mavriksfan11 (talk)
1128
2017-09-04 14:45:09.000000 UTC
7989105670.14676307CNN is hardly going to push a right wing "ideological agenda" is it? And having an organization's stated beliefs or cause in the lede is not UNDUE, it is NPOV. Darkness Shines (talk)
1129
2017-09-04 21:55:40.000000 UTC
7989711330.14673592Please stop your . If you continue to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Penicillium, you may be . Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
1130
2017-09-04 17:35:52.000000 UTC
7989345990.14666627Just to let you know, though I have undid the edits you did to Atlanta Falcons because it was considered overlinking. But you still can make more edits to Wikipedia. Learn more by checking out the box above! Braves404
1131
2017-09-04 06:43:50.000000 UTC
7988597740.14655076Oh, and how could I forget that coreboot also uses kconfig. Keyakakushi46 (talk)
1132
2017-09-04 00:27:34.000000 UTC
7988170070.14631006Uniform Care? Really? What the...? Since when is it in an encyclopedia's realm to describe how to maintain and care for the clothing being described? This is not an instruction manual, it is a resource for information about the uniform itself. Even portions of the section about how to wear the uniform properly is stretching it. I couldn't find one other instance of "Uniform Care" in any of the other military uniform articles, and there's a reason for that. If folks are having difficulty knowing how to launder their own uniforms, I suggest they ask the Army, not Wikipedia. I'm deleting that entire section for this reason. ScreaminEagle
1133
2017-09-04 07:38:33.000000 UTC
7988645490.14624134Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –72 (talk) :''If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
1134
2017-09-04 10:47:12.000000 UTC
7988833980.1460842My personal opinion is that Russia will not support any intervention since current instability is advantageous for Putin.Ymblanter (talk)
1135
2017-09-04 02:37:48.000000 UTC
7988327330.1460571